Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block after mastectomy. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to demonstrate equivalent dermatomal spread for ultrasound-guided single-injection Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block performed at T4-T5 level and ultrasound-guided single-injection (paravertebral) PVB block at the same level. Secondary objectives are Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores in the first 24 post-operative hours, opioid analgesia use intra-operatively and in the first 24 post-operative hours, block procedural time and patient discomfort during block insertion. The investigators hypothesize that ESP block efficacy is not inferior to PVB with reference to dermatomal sensory spread and analgesic efficacy, while being easier to perform with less associated discomfort during block insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started May 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2021
CompletedJuly 28, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.9 years
March 1, 2018
July 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dermatomal spread of sensory blockade
Assessment of extent of sensory block by pinprick
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain
Up to 24 hours
Opioid analgesia use intra-operatively
1 to 3 hours
Total opioid use in the first 24 hours
Up to 24 hours
Block procedural time
Up to 30 Minutes
Study Arms (2)
Paravertebral
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided paravertebral block performed pre-operatively with 20ml of a ropivacaine / bupivacaine mixture.
Erector spinae plane
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed pre-operatively with 20ml of a ropivacaine / bupivacaine mixture.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block performed pre-operatively in the anesthesia block room with 20ml of a ropivacaine / bupivacaine mixture.
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed pre-operatively in the anesthesia block room with 20ml of a ropivacaine / bupivacaine mixture.
General anesthesia administered as per preference of intra-operative attending anesthesiologist
Intra-operatively, opioids will be titrated to heart rate and spontaneous respiration rate e.g. fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone. Post-operatively in post anesthesia care unit, morphine and hydromorphone will be titrated to effect as necessary. After discharge from post anesthesia care unit, oral analgesia will be administered on an as required basis e.g. acetaminophen, non-steroid anti-inflammatory medications, acetaminophen / codeine and acetaminophen / oxycodone.
Weight-based dosing of this local anesthetic mixture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients over 18 years
- Consented to a regional anesthesia technique for post-operative analgesia
- Partial or complete mastectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects \<18 years
- those who refuse consent for PVB or ESP blockade,
- opioid tolerant patients
- psychiatric illness
- allergy to local anesthetic
- Local or systemic infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Kee SS, Frenzel JC, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Kuerer HM, Lucci A. Improved postoperative pain control using thoracic paravertebral block for breast operations. Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00763.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
PMID: 19624418BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Morgan PJ, Cil T, McNaught A, Escallon JM, Semple JL, Wu W, Chan VW. Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection. Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):703-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000436117.52143.bc.
PMID: 24071616BACKGROUNDExadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008.
PMID: 17006061BACKGROUNDChin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
PMID: 28188621BACKGROUNDChin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000581.
PMID: 28272292BACKGROUNDForero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PMID: 28919152BACKGROUNDMunoz F, Cubillos J, Bonilla AJ, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric oncological thoracic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;64(8):880-882. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0894-0. Epub 2017 Apr 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 28447318BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2018
First Posted
March 20, 2018
Study Start
May 29, 2018
Primary Completion
April 27, 2021
Study Completion
April 27, 2021
Last Updated
July 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share