Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
Food for Thought: A Randomized Trial of Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
1,818
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
7 months
August 28, 2018
March 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of Food Insecurity
Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Preferred Screening Modality
4 weeks
Comfort level with screening location
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Tablet Screening
ACTIVE COMPARATORFood insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet
Verbal Screening
ACTIVE COMPARATORFood insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview
Interventions
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department
You may not qualify if:
- Patient (child) in critical condition
- Patient (child) \>18 years of age
- Previously enrolled in study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphialead
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2018
First Posted
September 4, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2017
Primary Completion
November 28, 2017
Study Completion
January 18, 2018
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share