Fentanyl Versus Midazolam as an Adjunct to Intrathecal Bupivacaine In Children
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of the present study will be to compare the analgesic effect of addition of fentanyl or midazolam to intrathecal bupivacaine by using CHEOPS pain score (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) which is based on 6 criteria: crying, facial expression, child verbal expression, torso (body position), touching or grabbing at wound and legs position. Criterion 1 is given a score of 1-3, criteria 2 and 3 are given a score of 0-2 while criteria 4, 5 and 6 are given a score of 1-2; making the worst possible score 13 while the least possible score is 4. A total score ⩽ than 6 indicates adequate analgesia. Secondary outcomes of study will be;
- is to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia.
- comparative assessment regarding time for first analgesic request ,total analgesic requirements.
- Hemodynamic changes or other adverse events will be recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 14, 2021
CompletedJune 10, 2021
June 1, 2021
2.7 years
March 28, 2018
June 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative analgesia
CHEOPS pain score (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) which is based on 6 criteria: crying, facial expression, child verbal expression, torso (body position), touching or grabbing at wound and legs position. Criterion 1 is given a score of 1-3, criteria 2 and 3 are given a score of 0-2 while criteria 4, 5 and 6 are given a score of 1-2; making the worst possible score 13 while the least possible score is 4. A total score ⩽ than 6 indicates adequate analgesia.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia. comparative assessment regarding time for first analgesic request ,total analgesic requirements and any adverse effects.
24hour
Study Arms (3)
fentanyl
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup F: will receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg) + (5ug) of fentanyl intrathecally
midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup M: will receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg) + 0.5 mg of midazolam intrathecally
Bupivacaine
PLACEBO COMPARATORGroup B:intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg)
Interventions
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia patient care or in data collection. Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia, patient care, or in data collection. Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia, patient care, or in data collection. Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children aged 6-8years
- undergoing infra-umbilical surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with a known history of bleeding diathesis,
- allergy to local anesthetics,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric hospital,assiut university
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 715715, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Chattopadhyay A, Maitra S, Sen S, Bhattacharjee S, Layek A, Pal S, Ghosh K. A study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine alone with intrathecal bupivacaine midazolam combination in patients undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:567134. doi: 10.1155/2013/567134. Epub 2013 May 15.
PMID: 23762043RESULTDuman A, Apiliogullari S, Duman I. Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on quality of spinal anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):530-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03315.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
PMID: 20456062RESULTDodawad R, G B S, Pandarpurkar S, Jajee P. Intrathecal Midazolam as an Adjuvant in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Patients Undergoing an Elective Caesarean Section: A Clinical Comparative Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul 26;6(5):e38550. doi: 10.5812/aapm.38550. eCollection 2016 Oct.
PMID: 27847698RESULTLopez T, Sanchez FJ, Garzon JC, Muriel C. Spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jan;78(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03769.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
PMID: 22211775RESULTSanwatsarkar S, Kapur S, Saxena D, Yadav G, Khan NN. Comparative study of caudal clonidine and midazolam added to bupivacaine during infra-umbilical surgeries in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):241-247. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.209739.
PMID: 28781453RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wesam N Ali, MD
lecturer
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) The trial will be planned that neither the doctors nor the patients will be aware of the group allocations. The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the aneshesia, patient care or in data collection.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2018
First Posted
July 19, 2018
Study Start
August 15, 2018
Primary Completion
April 20, 2021
Study Completion
May 14, 2021
Last Updated
June 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06