NCT03572348

Brief Summary

The investigators want to verify whether the surgical outcome of vessel-sparing anastomotic repair in isolated short bulbar urethral strictures is not inferior to the surgical outcome of transecting anastomotic repair. Furthermore, the investigators compare the functional outcome of both techniques verifying if there is less erectile dysfunction after vessel-sparing anastomotic repair than after transecting anastomotic repair.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
8 countries

13 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 26, 2018

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 14, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 14, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

urethral strictureurethroplastybulbar urethrareconstructive surgerylower urinary tract symptomserectile function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • FFS at 24 months

    Failure-free survival at 24 months. Surgical failure is defined as urethroscopic evidence of stricture recurrence, impossible to pass with a 16Fr silicone urethral catheter, independent of whether the stricture is treated or not.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • FFS at 3 and 12 months

    3 and 12 months

  • Erectile function

    3, 12, and 24 months

  • Ejaculatory function

    3, 12, and 24 months

  • Voiding function

    3, 12, and 24 months

  • Lower Urinary Tract symptoms

    3, 12, and 24 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Transecting anastomotic repair (tAR)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Classic technique, which involves full thickness transection of the corpus spongiosum and the embedded urethral blood supply.

Procedure: Transecting anastomotic repair (tAR)

Vessel-sparing anastomotic repair (vsAR)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Alternative technique, leaving the bulbar arteries intact, only transecting and excising the narrow segment of the urethra and the surrounding spongiofibrosis.

Procedure: Vessel-sparing anastomotic repair (vsAR)

Interventions

Classic technique, which involves full thickness transection of the corpus spongiosum and the embedded urethral blood supply.

Transecting anastomotic repair (tAR)

Alternative technique, leaving the bulbar arteries intact, only transecting and excising the narrow segment of the urethra and the surrounding spongiofibrosis.

Vessel-sparing anastomotic repair (vsAR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Voluntary signed written informed consent (according to the rules of Good Clinical Practice and national regulations)
  • Male
  • Age \>= 18 years
  • Fit for operation, based on the surgeon's expert opinion
  • Isolated short (=\< 3cm) bulbar urethral stricture confirmed by preoperative retrograde urethrography (RUG), voiding cysto-urethrography (VCUG), cystoscopy, ultrasonography or a combination of investigations
  • Unique urethral stricture
  • Urethral stricture =\< 3 cm
  • Urethral stricture at the bulbar segment
  • Patient declares that it will be possible for him to attend the follow-up consultation

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of signed written informed consent
  • Age \<18 years
  • Female patients
  • Transgender patients
  • Patients unfit for operation
  • Concomitant urethral strictures at other urethral locations (penile urethra, membranous urethra, prostatic urethra, bladder neck)
  • Urethral strictures exceeding 3 cm
  • A unique urethral stricture at other urethral locations (penile urethra, membranous urethra, prostatic urethra, bladder neck)
  • Lichen Sclerosus related strictures
  • Strictures after failed hypospadias repair
  • Patients with neurogenic bladder
  • Shift of technique to augmented urethroplasty due to any circumstance
  • History of pelvic radiation therapy
  • Any condition or situation, which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the patient at significant risk, could confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study
  • Patient declares that it will be impossible for him to attend the follow-up consultations

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States

Location

Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School

Norfolk, Virginia, 23507-1912, United States

Location

Department of Urology, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Department of Urology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Dept. of Urology, Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Dept. of Urology, University Hospital Leuven

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Department of Urology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Shanghai, China

Location

Centro de Uretra Las Alamedas

Mexico City, Mexico

Location

Department of Urology, Hospital San José Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad de Monterrey

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Department of Urology, Hospital de Santa María, Universidad de Lisboa

Lisbon, Portugal

Location

Department of Urology, Departamento Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Hospital Universitario de Getafe

Madrid, Spain

Location

Dept. of Urology, Hospital Univ. de Valdecilla

Santander, Spain

Location

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Latini JM, McAninch JW, Brandes SB, Chung JY, Rosenstein D. SIU/ICUD Consultation On Urethral Strictures: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomy, and nomenclature of urethral stenoses, strictures, and pelvic fracture urethral disruption injuries. Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3 Suppl):S1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

    PMID: 24210733BACKGROUND
  • Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Verze P, De Nunzio C, Vitarelli A, Carmignani L. Contemporary urethral stricture characteristics in the developed world. Urology. 2013 Jan;81(1):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.062. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

    PMID: 23153951BACKGROUND
  • Morey AF, Watkin N, Shenfeld O, Eltahawy E, Giudice C. SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: Anterior urethra--primary anastomosis. Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3 Suppl):S23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

    PMID: 24373726BACKGROUND
  • Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R. The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1799-802. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.036.

    PMID: 17437823BACKGROUND
  • Gur U, Jordan GH. Vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (for proximal bulbar urethral strictures). BJU Int. 2008 May;101(9):1183-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07619.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18399836BACKGROUND
  • Lumen N, Poelaert F, Oosterlinck W, Lambert E, Decaestecker K, Tailly T, Hoebeke P, Spinoit AF. Nontransecting Anastomotic Repair in Urethral Reconstruction: Surgical and Functional Outcomes. J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1679-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 12.

    PMID: 27307398BACKGROUND
  • Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report. BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1090-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10508.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

    PMID: 21933325BACKGROUND
  • Virasoro R, Zuckerman JM, McCammon KA, DeLong JM, Tonkin JB, Capiel L, Rovegno AR, Favre G, Giudice CR, Eltahawy EA, Gur U, Jordan GH. International multi-institutional experience with the vessel-sparing technique to reconstruct the proximal bulbar urethra: mid-term results. World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2153-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1512-9. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

    PMID: 25690318BACKGROUND
  • Bugeja S, Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty. Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Feb;4(1):41-50. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.07.

    PMID: 26816808BACKGROUND
  • Anderson KM, Blakely SA, O'Donnell CI, Nikolavsky D, Flynn BJ. Primary non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty long-term success rates are similar to transecting urethroplasty. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Jan;49(1):83-88. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1454-1. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

    PMID: 27844407BACKGROUND
  • Le W, Li C, Zhang J, Wu D, Liu B. Preliminary clinical study on non-transecting anastomotic bulbomembranous urethroplasty. Front Med. 2017 Jun;11(2):277-283. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0515-x. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

    PMID: 28432540BACKGROUND
  • Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):90-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000069820.81726.00.

    PMID: 12796652BACKGROUND
  • Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.

    PMID: 15227649BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND
  • Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0.

    PMID: 9187685BACKGROUND
  • Utomo E, Blok BF, Pastoor H, Bangma CH, Korfage IJ. The measurement properties of the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5): a Dutch validation study. Andrology. 2015 Nov;3(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1111/andr.12112. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

    PMID: 26453539BACKGROUND
  • Verla W, Waterloos M, Lumen N. Urethroplasty and Quality of Life: Psychometric Validation of a Dutch Version of the Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Urol Int. 2017;99(4):460-466. doi: 10.1159/000479189. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

    PMID: 28850951BACKGROUND
  • Lesaffre E. Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(2):150-4.

    PMID: 18537788BACKGROUND
  • Rubinstein LV, Korn EL, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy SP, Smith MA. Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7199-206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.149.

    PMID: 16192604BACKGROUND
  • Verla W, Waterloos M, Waterschoot M, Van Parys B, Spinoit AF, Lumen N. VeSpAR trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing vessel-sparing anastomotic repair and transecting anastomotic repair in isolated short bulbar urethral strictures. Trials. 2020 Sep 11;21(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04712-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urethral StrictureUrologic DiseasesLower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urethral ObstructionUrethral DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Patients will be randomized using software in a 1:1 ratio in either the vessel-sparing group or the transecting group. Randomisation will be stratified per participating center and single blinded; double blindation is impossible as the surgeon has to know which technique to perform.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, interventional, multicentric, single-blinded, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, phase II trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2018

First Posted

June 28, 2018

Study Start

September 26, 2018

Primary Completion

December 14, 2023

Study Completion

December 14, 2023

Last Updated

January 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations