NCT05565040

Brief Summary

Background: Comparison between three different surgical techniques in the management of concealed penis. Methods: This prospective interventional non-randomized study included 150 pediatric patients with concealed penis. They were distributed equally into three groups; group A; patients treated by phallopexy only, group B; patients treated by complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia \& group C; patients treated by both phallopexy and dartos excision.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2018

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 7, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Concealedphallopexydartos excisiondeglovingpenile re-retraction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Post-operative appearance of penile skin congestion and/or necrosis

    Repeated and regular monthly examination of the patients as regards persistent bluish penile discoloration and or loss of penile skin viability. Also a questionnaire of parents about penile skin color, loss of skin, and/or appearance of any abnormal tissues

    6 months

  • Wound infection

    Repeated and regular monthly examination of the patients as regards the appearance of any penile skin infection and/or pyogenic discharge. Also a questionnaire of parents about the appearance of penile skin redness, pyogenic discharge, and/or the appearance of any pyogenic membranes

    6 months

  • Penile edema

    Repeated and regular monthly examination of the patients as regards the appearance of penile skin edema. Also a questionnaire of parents about any increase of penile girth than the usual

    6 months

  • Penile re-retraction

    Repeated and regular monthly examination of the patients as regards the development of any penile re-retraction in the form of retraction of the penis to or beneath the level of pubic skin. Also, a questionnaire of parents about this finding was done

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

Phallopexy group

EXPERIMENTAL

phallopexy only

Procedure: Circumcision in concealed penis

Dartos excision group

EXPERIMENTAL

complete circumferential dissection and excision of dartos fascia only

Procedure: Circumcision in concealed penis

Combined phallopexy and dartos excision group

EXPERIMENTAL

phallopexy as in patients of group A but after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia

Procedure: Circumcision in concealed penis

Interventions

comparison of three surgical techniques (as described in the arms) in the management of concealed penis in pediatrics

Combined phallopexy and dartos excision groupDartos excision groupPhallopexy group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with a buried penis at or below the pubic skin level with a stretched penile length for all of them within the normal range according to their ages as titrated in the literature

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with any associated anomalies like hypospadias, torsion, penoscrotal web, micropenis, mega-prepuce, or chordae were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faulty of Medicine

Alexandria, 12345, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Elrouby A. Concealed penis in pediatric age group: a comparison between three surgical techniques. BMC Urol. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01169-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaUrologic DiseasesDegloving Injuries

Interventions

Circumcision, Male

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, LymphoidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesSoft Tissue InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Body Modification, Non-TherapeuticCosmetic TechniquesTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, OperativeUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Ahmed EZ Elrouby, A.Professor

    University of Alexandria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Pediatric Surgery, Alexandria University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2022

First Posted

October 4, 2022

Study Start

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

October 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations