Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones
4 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to acceptable stone fragmentation during clinical use of the holmium laser when using energy settings 0.2J vs 0.8J. The hypothesis is that holmium laser energy settings 0.8J will require less time than lower energy settings 0.2J for fragmenting urinary stones. The clinical practice is to treat urinary stones until the stone is reduced to fragments ≤ 2 mm in size. This is determined by using the laser fiber which is 273 microns to visually estimate the size of the resultant fragments as described by Patel et al, J Endo 2014. Investigators will standardize the effect of stone size by creating a ratio of stone size to treatment time. In this study, the frequency is set at 15Hz. Thus, the study contains two arms: 0.2J\&15Hz, and 0.8J\&15Hz. Patients will be randomized into the two groups by the ratio of 1:1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 24, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 20, 2021
CompletedSeptember 20, 2021
August 1, 2020
1.7 years
November 14, 2017
July 27, 2021
August 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fragmentation Time
The time to fragment a stone into small pieces (≤2 mm, which is our current institutional practice)
up to 6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Total Operative Time
up to 6 hours
Pre-Operative Stone Size
Retrospective review of health chart at Baseline
Number of Participants With Either Ureteral or Renal Location of Urinary Stone
up to 6 hours
Number of Participants Treated for Either Single or Multiple Urinary Stones
up to 6 hours
Density of Urinary Stones
up to 6 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Holmium:YAG laser: 0.2J&15Hz
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are assigned to treat stones with 0.2J\&15Hz of the holmium laser.
Holmium:YAG laser: 0.8J&15Hz
EXPERIMENTALPatients are assigned to treat stones with 0.8J\&15Hz of the holmium laser.
Interventions
Treatment of urolithiasis is commonly done using the holmium:YAG laser as this has been shown to be a safe and effective method of treating a wide variety of stones and is currently considered the standard of care (AUA Guideline Panel on the Surgical Management of Stones)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients at least 18 years of age
- Patients with urinary stones who require endoscopic treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years of age
- Pregnant patients
- Pre-menopausal females who have not been on approved birth control for at least 1 month pre-operatively
- Patients with stones known to be refractory to treatment with the holmium laser
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shuang Li
- Organization
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Urology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Nakada, MD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2017
First Posted
May 16, 2018
Study Start
July 30, 2019
Primary Completion
March 24, 2021
Study Completion
March 24, 2021
Last Updated
September 20, 2021
Results First Posted
August 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share