Stone;Renal
7
2
2
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 7 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
1 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
Impact of Surgical Position on Stone-Free Rates in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones
Ureteral Stenting After Ureteroscopy for Stone Treatment, A Global Perspective on Indications and Outcomes
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones.