NCT03522740

Brief Summary

Good communication among patients, their families and loved ones, and their medical care providers is important when figuring out how to treat chronic diseases like kidney disease. A lot of people may not know all of their choices for how to treat kidney disease, and this can lead to rushed decisions or even a sense that there weren't any choices to make. In this study, the investigators are trying to find out if a decision-aid program on a computer can help people with kidney disease have more confidence in their decisions and have better agreement about their decisions with their families and loved ones. The DART study will be conducted at four sites in different areas of the country: Boston, Massachusetts; Portland, Maine; Chicago, Illinois; and San Diego, California. The study will enroll a total of 400 people with kidney disease at these four sites.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2018

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2018

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 21, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 21, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic Kidney DiseaseChronic Kidney FailurePalliative CareDialysisEnd-of-life careDecision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in score for patient-participants on the Decisional Conflict Scale, Low Literacy Version

    The decisional conflict scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of: 1. Uncertainty in choosing options; and 2. Modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty. The low literacy version of the DCS contains 10 items scored on a 3 point scale, with 0 points given for an answer of yes, 2 for an answer of unsure, and 4 for an answer of no. The total DCS score is the sum of the 10 items, multiplied by 2.5. Scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict) The DCS can be conceptualized as subscores, which will be examined as a part of this study, and are normalized to a 0 to 100 score as above. These include the following: 1. Uncertainty subscore: 2 items (questions 9 and 10) 2. Informed subscore: 3 items (questions 1, 2, and 3) 3. Values clarity subscore: 2 items (questions 4 and 5) 4. Support subscore: 3 items (questions 6, 7, and 8) Reference: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User\_Manuals/UM\_Decisional\_Conflict.pdf

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in score for patient-participants on the Decisional Conflict Scale, Low Literacy Version

    Up to 18 months

  • Advance Directive Completion

    3 months

  • Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Patients

    3 months

  • Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Carepartners

    3 months

  • Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Patients

    Up to 18 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Instability of Patient Preferences

    Up to 18 months

  • Patient/Care-Partner Concordance

    Up to 18 months

Study Arms (2)

Decision Aid for Renal Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual Care as in the 'no intervention arm' below plus access to an web-based decision aid, the Decision Aid for Renal Therapy to patients and their care-partners

Other: Decision Aid for Renal Therapy

Usual Care

NO INTERVENTION

In-person education as would be done at study sites plus 'Choosing a Treatment for Kidney Failure', an educational booklet published by the National Kidney Foundation

Interventions

DART is a web-based decision aid that informs older adults with advanced kidney disease of kidney disease treatment options and prompts them to consider their preferences and raise questions to discuss with their kidney disease providers.

Decision Aid for Renal Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • CKD stages 4 or 5 (non-dialysis) without an established dialysis start or transplant date within three months of expected randomization;
  • Age \>70 (with no upper limit);
  • English speaking;
  • Willingness to be randomized to DART; and
  • Able to sign informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • death, dialysis initiation or transplant deemed highly likely within the next three months by the patient's nephrologist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of California San Diego

San Diego, California, 92103, United States

Location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, 04102, United States

Location

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Gonzales KM, Koch-Weser S, Kennefick K, Lynch M, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Rifkin DE, Gordon EJ, Rossi A, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Decision-Making Engagement Preferences among Older Adults with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jun 1;35(6):772-781. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000341. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

  • Ladin K, Tighiouart H, Bronzi O, Koch-Weser S, Wong JB, Levine S, Agarwal A, Ren L, Degnan J, Sewall LN, Kuramitsu B, Fox P, Gordon EJ, Isakova T, Rifkin D, Rossi A, Weiner DE. Effectiveness of an Intervention to Improve Decision Making for Older Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jan;176(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M22-1543. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

  • Porteny T, Gonzales KM, Aufort KE, Levine S, Wong JB, Isakova T, Rifkin DE, Gordon EJ, Rossi A, Di Perna G, Koch-Weser S, Weiner DE, Ladin K; Stakeholder Advisory Board. Treatment Decision Making for Older Kidney Patients during COVID-19. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Jul;17(7):957-965. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13241021. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicKidney Failure, Chronic

Interventions

Decision Support Techniques

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Daniel E Weiner, MD

    Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Keren Ladin, PhD

    Tufts University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2018

First Posted

May 11, 2018

Study Start

May 30, 2018

Primary Completion

September 21, 2021

Study Completion

September 21, 2021

Last Updated

April 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations