Decision Aid for Renal Therapy
DART
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Good communication among patients, their families and loved ones, and their medical care providers is important when figuring out how to treat chronic diseases like kidney disease. A lot of people may not know all of their choices for how to treat kidney disease, and this can lead to rushed decisions or even a sense that there weren't any choices to make. In this study, the investigators are trying to find out if a decision-aid program on a computer can help people with kidney disease have more confidence in their decisions and have better agreement about their decisions with their families and loved ones. The DART study will be conducted at four sites in different areas of the country: Boston, Massachusetts; Portland, Maine; Chicago, Illinois; and San Diego, California. The study will enroll a total of 400 people with kidney disease at these four sites.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 21, 2021
CompletedApril 27, 2022
April 1, 2022
3.3 years
May 1, 2018
April 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in score for patient-participants on the Decisional Conflict Scale, Low Literacy Version
The decisional conflict scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of: 1. Uncertainty in choosing options; and 2. Modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty. The low literacy version of the DCS contains 10 items scored on a 3 point scale, with 0 points given for an answer of yes, 2 for an answer of unsure, and 4 for an answer of no. The total DCS score is the sum of the 10 items, multiplied by 2.5. Scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict) The DCS can be conceptualized as subscores, which will be examined as a part of this study, and are normalized to a 0 to 100 score as above. These include the following: 1. Uncertainty subscore: 2 items (questions 9 and 10) 2. Informed subscore: 3 items (questions 1, 2, and 3) 3. Values clarity subscore: 2 items (questions 4 and 5) 4. Support subscore: 3 items (questions 6, 7, and 8) Reference: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User\_Manuals/UM\_Decisional\_Conflict.pdf
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in score for patient-participants on the Decisional Conflict Scale, Low Literacy Version
Up to 18 months
Advance Directive Completion
3 months
Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Patients
3 months
Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Carepartners
3 months
Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire Score, Patients
Up to 18 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Instability of Patient Preferences
Up to 18 months
Patient/Care-Partner Concordance
Up to 18 months
Study Arms (2)
Decision Aid for Renal Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual Care as in the 'no intervention arm' below plus access to an web-based decision aid, the Decision Aid for Renal Therapy to patients and their care-partners
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONIn-person education as would be done at study sites plus 'Choosing a Treatment for Kidney Failure', an educational booklet published by the National Kidney Foundation
Interventions
DART is a web-based decision aid that informs older adults with advanced kidney disease of kidney disease treatment options and prompts them to consider their preferences and raise questions to discuss with their kidney disease providers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CKD stages 4 or 5 (non-dialysis) without an established dialysis start or transplant date within three months of expected randomization;
- Age \>70 (with no upper limit);
- English speaking;
- Willingness to be randomized to DART; and
- Able to sign informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- death, dialysis initiation or transplant deemed highly likely within the next three months by the patient's nephrologist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Universitylead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Related Publications (3)
Gonzales KM, Koch-Weser S, Kennefick K, Lynch M, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Rifkin DE, Gordon EJ, Rossi A, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Decision-Making Engagement Preferences among Older Adults with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jun 1;35(6):772-781. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000341. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
PMID: 38517479DERIVEDLadin K, Tighiouart H, Bronzi O, Koch-Weser S, Wong JB, Levine S, Agarwal A, Ren L, Degnan J, Sewall LN, Kuramitsu B, Fox P, Gordon EJ, Isakova T, Rifkin D, Rossi A, Weiner DE. Effectiveness of an Intervention to Improve Decision Making for Older Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jan;176(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M22-1543. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
PMID: 36534976DERIVEDPorteny T, Gonzales KM, Aufort KE, Levine S, Wong JB, Isakova T, Rifkin DE, Gordon EJ, Rossi A, Di Perna G, Koch-Weser S, Weiner DE, Ladin K; Stakeholder Advisory Board. Treatment Decision Making for Older Kidney Patients during COVID-19. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Jul;17(7):957-965. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13241021. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
PMID: 35672037DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel E Weiner, MD
Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keren Ladin, PhD
Tufts University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2018
First Posted
May 11, 2018
Study Start
May 30, 2018
Primary Completion
September 21, 2021
Study Completion
September 21, 2021
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share