NCT03502239

Brief Summary

Children with disorders that impact neurodevelopment often have difficulties with executive functions and regulating emotions. Cognitive-based video game training has been shown to improve outcomes, however, this training has been expensive, has required professional supervision, and has been investigated only within a narrow group of children. The Mega Team study will test the effects of a highly engaging, take-home video game-based intervention designed to improve executive functioning in children with various brain-based developmental disorders.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
440

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 26, 2018

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Response Inhibition

    Inhibitory control will be measured using the Stop Signal Task (SST). The SST measures the ability to cancel an already initiated motor response. The primary outcome measure will be the participants' average stop signal reaction time (SSRT).

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

  • Change in Working Memory

    Verbal and Spatial N-back (1, 2 conditions) will be used to assess central executive working memory. The N-Back task requires on-line monitoring, updating, and manipulation of information and measures key processes within working memory. In the N-Back task, the participant is required to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously, where n is a pre-specified integer, usually 0, 1, or 2. The current study will use letters (verbal) and spatial location (spatial) paradigms. Visual and spatial working memory span will be assessed using the Spatial Span subtest and the Digit Span item from the WISC-IV Integrated. The primary outcome measure will be the overall score.

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Planning and Organization

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

  • Everyday functioning and impairment

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

  • Inattentive and Hyperactivity Behaviour rated by parent and teacher

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

  • Academic accuracy and efficiency

    Baseline, Post-training study visit #1 (4-5 weeks after baseline), Post-training study visit #2 (6 months after baseline)

Study Arms (2)

Treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects randomly assigned to this arm will train on the Mega Team video game.

Other: Mega Team - video game

Control- wait list group

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects randomly assigned to this arm will be the wait-list group. They are allowed to play the video games that they usually play.

Interventions

Subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group will be instructed to practice Mega Team for 15 minutes a day, 5 days a week for a minimum of 21 days and a maximum of 25 days.

Also known as: Mega Team
Treatment group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be 6-12 years of age
  • Have IQ above 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent.
  • Diagnosed with ADHD based upon DSM 5 criteria by a referring clinician confirmed by semi structured interview with the parents using PICS, including information from parent and teacher ratings of an established measure of ADHD symptoms.
  • Does not have a diagnosis of ASD or CHD \[in this case, individuals can be enrolled into Study 2 (ASD) or Study 3 (CHD)\].
  • Have reliable access to the internet
  • Must be 6-12 years of age
  • Have IQ above 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent
  • Meets clinical diagnosis of ASD by referral services (Holland Bloorview, CAMH) supported by ADOS.
  • Have reliable access to the internet
  • Must be 6-12 years of age
  • Have IQ above 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent
  • Must have a diagnosis of Transposition of the Great Arteries (TGA) or Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
  • Must have received cardiac surgery before 6 weeks of age.
  • Have reliable access to the internet

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 6 years or older than 12
  • IQ below 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent
  • Does not meet consensus diagnosis of DSM 5 criteria for ADHD based on a semi structured interview with the parents using PICS-6, including information from parent and teacher ratings of an established measure of ADHD symptoms.
  • Has a diagnosis of ASD or CHD \[in this case, individuals can be enrolled into Study 2 (ASD) or Study 3 (CHD)\].
  • Younger than 6 years or older than 12
  • IQ below 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent
  • Does not meet confirmed diagnosis of ASD based on ADOS
  • Younger than 6 years or older than 12
  • IQ below 70 as estimated by two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence, Second Edition (WASI II) or equivalent
  • Does not have a diagnosis of Transposition of the Great Arteries (TGA) or Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
  • Did not receive cardiac surgery before 6 weeks of age.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

    PMID: 23020641BACKGROUND
  • McAuley T, Crosbie J, Charach A, Schachar R. The persistence of cognitive deficits in remitted and unremitted ADHD: a case for the state-independence of response inhibition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;55(3):292-300. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12160. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

    PMID: 24261515BACKGROUND
  • Lawson RA, Papadakis AA, Higginson CI, Barnett JE, Wills MC, Strang JF, Wallace GL, Kenworthy L. Everyday executive function impairments predict comorbid psychopathology in autism spectrum and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders. Neuropsychology. 2015 May;29(3):445-53. doi: 10.1037/neu0000145. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

    PMID: 25313979BACKGROUND
  • Morris MC, Evans LD, Rao U, Garber J. Executive function moderates the relation between coping and depressive symptoms. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(1):31-49. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.925545. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

    PMID: 24866556BACKGROUND
  • Vinogradov S, Fisher M, de Villers-Sidani E. Cognitive training for impaired neural systems in neuropsychiatric illness. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):43-76. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.251. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

    PMID: 22048465BACKGROUND
  • Cortese S, Ferrin M, Brandeis D, Buitelaar J, Daley D, Dittmann RW, Holtmann M, Santosh P, Stevenson J, Stringaris A, Zuddas A, Sonuga-Barke EJ; European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG). Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of clinical and neuropsychological outcomes from randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;54(3):164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

    PMID: 25721181BACKGROUND
  • Beck SJ, Hanson CA, Puffenberger SS, Benninger KL, Benninger WB. A controlled trial of working memory training for children and adolescents with ADHD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39(6):825-36. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2010.517162.

    PMID: 21058129BACKGROUND
  • Dahlin, K. I. E. Effects of working memory training on reading in children with special needs. Read. Writ. 24, 479-491 (2011)

    BACKGROUND
  • Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):F9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x.

    PMID: 19635074BACKGROUND
  • Johnstone SJ, Roodenrys S, Blackman R, Johnston E, Loveday K, Mantz S, Barratt MF. Neurocognitive training for children with and without AD/HD. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2012 Mar;4(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s12402-011-0069-8. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

    PMID: 22179720BACKGROUND
  • Alloway, T. Can interactive working memory training improving learning? J. Interact. Learn. Res. 23, 197-207 (2012)

    BACKGROUND
  • Shalev L, Tsal Y, Mevorach C. Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: effective direct intervention for children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychol. 2007 Jul;13(4):382-8. doi: 10.1080/09297040600770787.

    PMID: 17564853BACKGROUND
  • Van der Molen MJ, Van Luit JE, Van der Molen MW, Jongmans MJ. Everyday memory and working memory in adolescents with mild intellectual disability. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 May;115(3):207-17. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-115.3.207.

    PMID: 20441391BACKGROUND
  • Craig F, Margari F, Legrottaglie AR, Palumbi R, de Giambattista C, Margari L. A review of executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 May 12;12:1191-202. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S104620. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27274255BACKGROUND
  • Willcutt EG, Doyle AE, Nigg JT, Faraone SV, Pennington BF. Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1336-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006.

    PMID: 15950006BACKGROUND
  • Calderon J, Bellinger DC. Executive function deficits in congenital heart disease: why is intervention important? Cardiol Young. 2015 Oct;25(7):1238-46. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115001134. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

    PMID: 26082199BACKGROUND
  • Wechsler, D. WASI -II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence - second edition. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 31, 337-41 (2013)

    BACKGROUND
  • Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021.

    PMID: 9204677BACKGROUND
  • Bussing R, Fernandez M, Harwood M, Wei Hou, Garvan CW, Eyberg SM, Swanson JM. Parent and teacher SNAP-IV ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: psychometric properties and normative ratings from a school district sample. Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):317-28. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313888. Epub 2008 Feb 29.

    PMID: 18310593BACKGROUND
  • Bedard AC, Ickowicz A, Logan GD, Hogg-Johnson S, Schachar R, Tannock R. Selective inhibition in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder off and on stimulant medication. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003 Jun;31(3):315-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1023285614844.

    PMID: 12774864BACKGROUND
  • Bedard AC, Martinussen R, Ickowicz A, Tannock R. Methylphenidate improves visual-spatial memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;43(3):260-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200403000-00006.

    PMID: 15076258BACKGROUND
  • Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P; CONSORT Group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008.

    PMID: 18283207BACKGROUND
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

    PMID: 18929686BACKGROUND
  • Chein JM, Morrison AB. Expanding the mind's workspace: training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):193-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.193.

    PMID: 20382919BACKGROUND
  • Dahlin E, Nyberg L, Backman L, Neely AS. Plasticity of executive functioning in young and older adults: immediate training gains, transfer, and long-term maintenance. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):720-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014296.

    PMID: 19140643BACKGROUND
  • Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Perrig WJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6829-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801268105. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

    PMID: 18443283BACKGROUND
  • Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J. & Tannock, R. Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control. Psychol. Sci. 8, 60-64 (1997)

    BACKGROUND
  • Delis, D., Kaplan, E. & Kramer, J. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 20, 117-128 (2001)

    BACKGROUND
  • Baron IS. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol. 2000 Sep;6(3):235-8. doi: 10.1076/chin.6.3.235.3152. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11419452BACKGROUND
  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S. & Mather, N. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Test 2001, 1-9 (2001)

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityHeart Defects, Congenital

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental DisordersCardiovascular AbnormalitiesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Jennifer Crosbie, Ph.D., C.Psych.

    The Hospital for Sick Children

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Scientist/Psychologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2018

First Posted

April 18, 2018

Study Start

May 26, 2018

Primary Completion

March 10, 2023

Study Completion

March 15, 2023

Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

de-identified data will be shared with our sponsor/funders - ChildBright Network and eHave.

Locations