Disease-Modifying Treatments for Myasthenia Gravis
PROMISE-MG
Prospective Multicenter Observational Cohort Study of Comparative Effectiveness of Disease-modifying Treatments for Myasthenia Gravis
1 other identifier
observational
82
2 countries
19
Brief Summary
This study is designed to address the evidence gaps in a real-world setting and help patients with MG choose treatments that are best suited to them. It is a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of comparative effectiveness of MG treatments, with a patient-centered primary outcome measure, to guide clinicians, patients and payers regarding the choice of treatment options for this chronic and serious disease. Primary: To compare the effectiveness of azathioprine (AZT) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Secondary: To compare the outcomes in patients receiving an adequate dose and duration of AZT or MMF over the 2-3 year study period, vs. patients not receiving adequate doses and duration of these agents
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2018
Typical duration for all trials
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 18, 2026
CompletedJune 18, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.7 years
March 21, 2018
April 9, 2026
May 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Patient-Reported Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life, 15, Revised ( MG-QOL15r)
Measures MG symptoms, physical, social and emotional functioning related to MG, with 15 items, 3 response option, 0-2 for each item, Total score range 0-30, higher scores indicating worse function
Baseline, 24-36 months
Number of Participants With Improvement in Composite Outcome of Clinical Improvement and Adverse Effects
Measured by a composite of clinical improvement and adverse effects of treatments. Clinical improvement: achievement of MGFA Post-Intervention Status (PIS) Minimal Manifestation Status (MM) or better, defined below. Adverse effects end point: no more than Grade 1 CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) medication side-effects, defined below. MGFA PIS- MM: the patient has no symptoms or functional limitations from MG but has some weakness on examination of some muscles. CTCAE: list of adverse event (AE) terms commonly encountered in oncology but is useful to monitor the side effects of any intervention. Each AE term is defined and graded on a 1 to 5 scale indicating the severity of the AE, 1 representing the mildest side effect and 5 representing death. Grade 1 CTCAE side-effects: "asymptomatic or only mild symptoms; intervention not indicated".
Baseline, 24-36 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scores
Baseline, 24-36 months
Number of Participants With Improvement in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL)
Baseline, 24-36 months
Number of Participants With Improvement in Myasthenia Gravis Manual Muscle Test Scores (MG-MMT)
Baseline, 24-36 months
Change in Number of Participants Who Were Hospitalized for Myasthenia Gravis (MG)
Baseline, 24-36 months
Study Arms (2)
azathioprine (AZT)
Patients with MG who are receiving azathioprine as part of routine clinical care
mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
Patients with MG who are receiving mycophenolate mofetil as part of routine clinical care
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
MG patients with autoimmune MG
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years of age
- Acquired autoimmune MG, with weakness and confirmed by one or more of the following:
- Elevated AChR or MuSK antibodies
- Unequivocal response to cholinesterase inhibitors
- Abnormal RNS or increased jitter (without nerve or muscle disease sufficient to produce a decrement or increased jitter)
- Patients seen initially at the participating center after January 1, 2017.
- Patients on pyridostigmine at the first evaluation at the participating center ("baseline visit") may be included if pyridostigmine was started ≤3 months before the baseline visit.
- Patients who received corticosteroids \>90 days prior to baseline visit for a non-MG indication may be included. (Patients who have received corticosteroids for a non-MG indication between 31 and 90 days before baseline visit will be evaluated by the primary investigators on a case by case basis to determine if the extent and dose of corticosteroid could have impacted the course of MG or symptoms of MG.)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with non-autoimmune MG (congenital myasthenic syndromes, drug-induced MG)
- Patients on immunosuppressive agents at the baseline visit.
- Patients who have previously received steroids for the treatment of MG.
- Patients with steroid use for a non-MG indication \< 30 days prior to the baseline visit.
- Patients with previous thymectomy, IVIg or plasma exchange, or treatment with a non-steroidal immunosuppressive agent (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil cyclosporine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, rituximab, or any investigational immunosuppressive agent). Patients who have outcomes measured within 24 hours after initiation of IVIg or PLEX are acceptable.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centercollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (19)
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 84303, United States
Unversity of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
University at Buffalo, SUNY
Buffalo, New York, 14202, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
University of Vermont - Larner College of Medicine
Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States
University of Alberta Hospital, Faculty of Medicine
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2G3, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A5A5, Canada
Related Publications (17)
Deenen JC, Horlings CG, Verschuuren JJ, Verbeek AL, van Engelen BG. The Epidemiology of Neuromuscular Disorders: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2(1):73-85.
PMID: 28198707BACKGROUNDSanders DB, Wolfe GI, Narayanaswami P. Author response: International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: Executive summary. Neurology. 2017 Jan 31;88(5):505-506. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003570. No abstract available.
PMID: 28138082BACKGROUNDBurns TM, Sadjadi R, Utsugisawa K, Gwathmey KG, Joshi A, Jones S, Bril V, Barnett C, Guptill JT, Sanders DB, Hobson-Webb L, Juel VC, Massey J, Gable KL, Silvestri NJ, Wolfe G, Cutter G, Nagane Y, Murai H, Masuda M, Farrugia ME, Carmichael C, Birnbaum S, Hogrel JY, Nafissi S, Fatehi F, Ou C, Liu W, Conaway M. International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Dec;54(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1002/mus.25198. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
PMID: 27220659BACKGROUNDMullins LL, Carpentier MY, Paul RH, Sanders DB; Muscle Study Group. Disease-specific measure of quality of life for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Aug;38(2):947-56. doi: 10.1002/mus.21016.
PMID: 18697209BACKGROUNDBurns TM, Grouse CK, Wolfe GI, Conaway MR, Sanders DB; MG Composite and MG-OL15 Study Group. The MG-QOL15 for following the health-related quality of life of patients with myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2011 Jan;43(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.21883.
PMID: 21082698BACKGROUNDJaretzki A 3rd, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC, Penn AS, Sanders DB. Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology. 2000 Jul 12;55(1):16-23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.1.16. No abstract available.
PMID: 10891897BACKGROUNDBurns TM, Conaway M, Sanders DB; MG Composite and MG-QOL15 Study Group. The MG Composite: A valid and reliable outcome measure for myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2010 May 4;74(18):1434-40. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1b1e.
PMID: 20439845BACKGROUNDSadjadi R, Conaway M, Cutter G, Sanders DB, Burns TM; MG Composite MG-QOL15 Study Group. Psychometric evaluation of the myasthenia gravis composite using Rasch analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jun;45(6):820-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.23260.
PMID: 22581534BACKGROUNDBurns TM, Conaway MR, Cutter GR, Sanders DB; Muscle Study Group. Construction of an efficient evaluative instrument for myasthenia gravis: the MG composite. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Dec;38(6):1553-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.21185.
PMID: 19016543BACKGROUNDWolfe GI, Herbelin L, Nations SP, Foster B, Bryan WW, Barohn RJ. Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile. Neurology. 1999 Apr 22;52(7):1487-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.7.1487.
PMID: 10227640BACKGROUNDSanders DB, Tucker-Lipscomb B, Massey JM. A simple manual muscle test for myasthenia gravis: validation and comparison with the QMG score. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Sep;998:440-4. doi: 10.1196/annals.1254.057. No abstract available.
PMID: 14592912BACKGROUNDGilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Oct;14(10):1023-36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00145-3.
PMID: 26376969BACKGROUNDBang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.
PMID: 16401269BACKGROUNDLi F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2016;(In press).
BACKGROUNDCrump RK. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 2009;96(1):187-199.
BACKGROUNDMeriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Disorders of Neuromuscular Transmission. In: Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovic J, Mazziotta JC, editors. Neurology in Clinical Practice. 6 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. p 2046-2065.
BACKGROUNDNarayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Thomas L, Thibault D, Blevins J, Desai R, Krueger A, Bibeau K, Liu B, Guptill JT; PROMISE-MG Study Group. Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2024 Mar;23(3):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00028-0.
PMID: 38365379DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jason Blevins
- Organization
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffery Guptill, MD
Duke University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donald Sanders, MD
Duke University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pushpa Narayanaswami, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 3 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2018
First Posted
April 6, 2018
Study Start
May 7, 2018
Primary Completion
January 31, 2021
Study Completion
January 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 18, 2026
Results First Posted
June 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share