Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis
CAMARO
A Randomised, Open-label Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine for Induction of Remission in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
70
2 countries
14
Brief Summary
Rationale: Current standard therapy of autoimmune hepatitis consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, a significant proportion of patients does not respond to, or is intolerant for, azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has surpassed azathioprine as therapy to prevent organ transplant rejection and is sometimes used as an alternative option for autoimmune hepatitis. Several case series and one prospective study have documented the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for autoimmune hepatitis. Robust evidence from a formal randomized clinical trial is lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy in patients with treatment naive autoimmune hepatitis. Study design: Multicenter, randomised, open-label intervention study Study population: Patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune hepatitis who are in need of induction therapy according to current guidelines. Intervention: The intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. The control group will be treated with azathioprine for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent Clinical Practice Guidelines by the European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL). Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) -score (and its components bilirubin, INR, creatinine), albumin, pseudocholinesterase and N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis) -score and aspects of quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedJune 22, 2023
October 1, 2021
6.4 years
August 17, 2016
June 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biochemical remission
The percentage of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum ALT and IgG levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Time to biochemical remission
24 weeks
Biochemical remission at any time
Up to 24 weeks
Complete biochemical response, defined as normalization of AST, ALT and IgG at 6 months after initiation of treatment
Up to 24 weeks
Insufficient response, defined as lack of complete biochemical response determined at 6 months
Up to 24 weeks
Non-response at 4 weeks: defined as <50% decrease of serum transaminases within 4 weeks after initiation of treatment
Up to 4 weeks
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mycophenolate mofetil
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Azathioprine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR. The control group will be treated with azathioprine (standard of care) for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Probable or definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Study Group criteria
- First presentation of AIH requiring treatment according to the current EASL guidelines
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Must provide informed consent and agree to comply with the trial protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Overlap syndrome with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) or Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) (Paris criteria, strong positive Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies (AMA), past liver biopsy or cholangiographic findings compatible with PBC or PSC).
- Presentation with acute liver failure, defined as presence of hepatic encephalopathy and coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5)
- Current treatment with prednisone/prednisolone and/or immunosuppressive medication for an indication other than autoimmune hepatitis
- Current systemic infection
- Other clinically significant medical conditions that could interfere with the trial
- If female of childbearing potential: known pregnancy, or unwilling to practice anticontraceptive measures.
- History of noncompliance with medical regimens, or patients who are considered to be potentially unreliable or unable to participate
- Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or compliance with the trial is uncertain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
University Hospital Antwerpen
Antwerp, Belgium
Zuyderland
Heerlen, Limburg, 6419 PC, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
Sint Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, 3430 EM, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Centre
Nijmegen, 6525GA, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Bernhoven
Uden, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Snijders RJALM, Stoelinga AEC, Gevers TJG, Pape S, Biewenga M, Tushuizen ME, Verdonk RC, de Jonge HJM, Vrolijk JM, Bakker SF, Vanwolleghem T, de Boer YS, Baven Pronk MAMC, Beuers U, van der Meer AJ, Gerven NMFV, Sijtsma MGM, van Eijck BC, van IJzendoorn MC, van Herwaarden M, van den Brand FF, Korkmaz KS, van den Berg AP, Guichelaar MMJ, Levens AD, van Hoek B, Drenth JPH; Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Working Group. An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2024 Apr;80(4):576-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.11.032. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
PMID: 38101756DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bart van Hoek, MD, PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joost PH Drenth, MD, PhD
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2016
First Posted
September 14, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2021-10