Assisting in Decisions in Emergency Departments: (ED-AID) Study
ED-AID
Assisting in Informing Decisions in Emergency Departments: (ED-AID) Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
49
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study will test a patient decision aid about safe firearm storage during suicidal crisis. The investigators hypothesize that participants with higher quality decisions after the decision aid will be more likely to change their firearm storage to reduce access during the time of crisis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 9, 2019
CompletedJune 24, 2021
June 1, 2021
10 months
March 1, 2018
June 22, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Acceptability of Lethal Means Decision Aid
This will be assessed using the Ottawa Acceptability Questionnaire that captures the patient's feedback on the design, presentation, quality, and information presented in the decision aid through both survey and open ended questions. Questions include likert scale responses (range of responses are specific to each question's content). There are also a series of yes/no/don't know questions related to content presented. Each "no" response asks the participant to elaborate in an open ended response. The participant also has the ability to provide general feedback in open ended feedback format. There are no subscales to this measure.
Baseline
Decision Making Quality in Emergency Department (ED)
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), low literacy 10 item scale, measures decision quality, uncertainty, personal perceptions and satisfaction. A total score is computed through sum of items 1-10 (Yes=1; unsure=2; no=4) divided by 10, and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (no decision conflict) to 100 (extreme decision conflict). The sum of items 1, 2, 3, divided by 3 and multiplied by 25 is the informed decision subscale (1 extremely informed) to 100 extremely uninformed). The sum of items 4 and 5, divided by 2 and multiplied by 25 is the values clarity (0 feels extremely clear to 100 feels extremely unclear). The sum of items 9 and 10, divided by 2 and multiplied by 25 is the uncertainty subscale (0 feels extremely certain about best choice to 100 feels extremely uncertain about best choice). The sum of items 6, 7, 8, divided by 3 and multiplied by 25 is the support subscale (0 feels extremely supported in decision making to 100 feels extremely unsupported in decision making).
Baseline
Home Firearm Storage
At both baseline and one week follow up, participants will complete a study specific survey that asks about how they currently store their firearms or current plans to change how they store their firearms to measure change in storage.
Baseline and 1 week follow up
Decision Making Quality - Follow up
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), low literacy 10 item scale, measures decision quality, uncertainty, personal perceptions and satisfaction. A total score is computed through sum of items 1-10 (Yes=1; unsure=2; no=4) divided by 10, and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (no decision conflict) to 100 (extreme decision conflict). The sum of items 1, 2, 3, divided by 3 and multiplied by 25 is the informed decision subscale (1 extremely informed) to 100 extremely uninformed). The sum of items 4 and 5, divided by 2 and multiplied by 25 is the values clarity (0 feels extremely clear to 100 feels extremely unclear). The sum of items 9 and 10, divided by 2 and multiplied by 25 is the uncertainty subscale (0 feels extremely certain about best choice to 100 feels extremely uncertain about best choice). The sum of items 6, 7, 8, divided by 3 and multiplied by 25 is the support subscale (0 feels extremely supported in decision making to 100 feels extremely unsupported in decision making).
1 week follow up
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior at One Month
While this pilot trial is not powered to detect a change in mental health outcomes, as part of the feasibility for a larger trial, the investigators will attempt to track suicide attempts and outcomes through medical record chart review.
1 month post baseline
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior at Three Months
While this pilot trial is not powered to detect a change in mental health outcomes, as part of the feasibility for a larger trial, the investigators will attempt to track suicide attempts and outcomes through medical record chart review.
3 months post baseline
Vital Statistics (Suicide death)
While this pilot trial is not powered to detect a change in suicide outcomes, as part of the feasibility for a larger trial, the investigators will attempt to track suicide death outcomes through state vital statistics reporting.
3 months post baseline
Study Arms (2)
Decision Aid Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this arm will view the decision aid on a tablet in the emergency department.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants randomized to this arm will be asked to review general suicide prevention information on a tablet in the emergency department.
Interventions
This intervention is a tablet based Lethal Means Decision Aid with proposed use to augment lethal means counseling in emergency departments for patients at risk of suicide.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being evaluated in the emergency department for suicidal ideation/suicide attempt
- Deemed medically stable by ED physician
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years old
- Able and willing to have telephone follow up at 1 week
- Report at least one firearm in the home
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to participate medically or cognitively (e.g. sustained altered level of consciousness, hostility, psychosis, sexual assault victim, severe vomiting or pain)
- Currently in legal custody
- Live in group home or other supervised custody
- Already enrolled
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)collaborator
- Denver Health and Hospital Authoritycollaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Memorial Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States
Denver Health
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Related Publications (1)
Betz ME, Knoepke CE, Simpson S, Siry BJ, Clement A, Saunders T, Johnson R, Azrael D, Boudreaux ED, Omeragic F, Adams LM, Almond S, Juarez-Colunga E, Matlock DD. An Interactive Web-Based Lethal Means Safety Decision Aid for Suicidal Adults (Lock to Live): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 29;22(1):e16253. doi: 10.2196/16253.
PMID: 32012056DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marian Betz, MD, MPH
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2018
First Posted
March 27, 2018
Study Start
June 20, 2018
Primary Completion
April 9, 2019
Study Completion
April 9, 2019
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share