Decision Aid for Dementia Therapies
Helping Patients, Families, and Clinicians Make Shared Decisions About Therapies for Dementia
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to develop a decision aid to support patients and families making decisions about medications for dementia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedSeptember 16, 2025
September 1, 2025
2 months
October 4, 2024
September 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Decisional Conflict
To access the preliminary efficacy on decisional conflict including personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors that contribute to feelings of uncertainty and effective decision making. Decisional Conflict Scale - Higher numbers mean more uncertainty. O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical decision making, 15(1), 25-30. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User\_Manuals/UM\_Decisional\_Conflict.pdf
From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2
Shared Decision Making
To determine the extent that health care providers engage with patients as a part of their shared decision making, specifically looking at the discussion of treatment options and their pros and cons as well as the patient's preferences. Shared Decision Making Process Scale - Higher numbers mean more shared decision making. https://mghdecisionsciences.org/tools-training/sdm-process-survey/
From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2
Decisional Self-Efficacy
To determine the patient's perception of their self-efficacy in decision making including measuring their self-confidence in their ability to make decisions. Decision Self-Efficacy Scale where higher numbers mean they patient has a higher perception of self-efficacy. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/Tools/Decision\_SelfEfficacy.pdf
From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2
Study Arms (1)
Decision Aid
EXPERIMENTALParticipants provide feedback on the development of a decision aid for dementia therapies.
Interventions
Patients with dementia and care partners will receive an iteration of the decision aid and provide feedback.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients:
- UCHealth patient
- Ages 18 y/o and above
- Documented neurocognitive deficits suggestive of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia as determined by their treating clinician.
- English or Spanish speaking
- Caregiver:
- Ages 18 y/o and above
- Identified by the study participant as the person who helps the most with their medical care outside the hospital or clinic.
- English or Spanish speaking
- Clinicians:
- Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
- English or Spanish speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Patients:
- Not English or Spanish-speaking
- Neurocognitive deficits suggestive of moderate or severe cognitive impairment or late stage dementia.
- Not able to consent for themselves
- Caregiver:
- Ages 17 y/o and below
- Not English or Spanish-speaking
- Clinicians:
- Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
- English or Spanish-speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Related Publications (2)
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):701-11. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10386231. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
PMID: 21088131BACKGROUNDvan Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, Kanekiyo M, Li D, Reyderman L, Cohen S, Froelich L, Katayama S, Sabbagh M, Vellas B, Watson D, Dhadda S, Irizarry M, Kramer LD, Iwatsubo T. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):9-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
PMID: 36449413BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dan Matlock, MD, MPH
University of Colorado, Denver
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2024
First Posted
October 15, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
September 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share