NCT03181724

Brief Summary

The investigators plan a prospective randomized controlled study that compares whether the use of a decision aid results in different scores on variables reflective of the decision-making process, behavior, health outcomes, communication, and healthcare system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 13, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 9, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2017

Results QC Date

June 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Decision Conflict Scale (DCS)

    This scale measures patients' perception of uncertainty in making health-related decisions and consists of 3 subscales: (1) uncertainty choosing between different options, (2) modifiable factors contributing to this uncertainty-feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values, and feeling unsupported, and (3) perceived effectiveness of the decision-making an informed and values-based choice and expressing satisfaction with the decision. We used the validated statement format Decisional Conflict Scale, consisting of 16 items with 5 response options. Total scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire

    Day 1

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

    Day 1

  • Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure

    Day 1

  • 11-point Ordinal Satisfaction Scale

    Day 1

  • Change in Decision Regret Scale After 6 Weeks and 6 Months

    6 week and 6 month follow up

Study Arms (2)

Decision Aid

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cohort that will receive a decision aid.

Behavioral: Decision Aid

No Decision Aid (control)

NO INTERVENTION

One cohort will not receive the decision aid, and instead will receive only a brochure as standard treatment.

Interventions

Decision AidBEHAVIORAL

Cohort I will be managed with a decision aid (henceforth "DA"), and Cohort II will be managed without one. The patients in Cohort I will receive the DA, which they can complete in a separate room and take home. The decision aids include information on the disease/condition, treatment options, benefits, risks, scientific uncertainties, and probabilities of potential outcomes tailored to the patient's health risks factors. Additionally, it includes values clarifications such as describing outcomes in functional terms, asking patients to consider which benefits and risks matter most to them, and guidance in the steps of decision making and discussing their decision with family/friends. It is interactive and dynamic, helping patients clarify their preferences and come to a decision that feels best to them.

Decision Aid

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • at least 18 years of age
  • English-speaking
  • Diagnosis of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthritis

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior surgical intervention for trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthritis
  • Previously accessed or used the online TMC arthritis Decision Aid (DA)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.

    PMID: 24470076BACKGROUND
  • Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein J, Howe J, Ciol M, Mulley AG Jr. Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9):959-69. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009000-00009.

    PMID: 10982117BACKGROUND
  • Jayadev C, Khan T, Coulter A, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Patient decision aids in knee replacement surgery. Knee. 2012 Dec;19(6):746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

    PMID: 22386538BACKGROUND
  • Murray E, Davis H, Tai SS, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. BMJ. 2001 Sep 1;323(7311):493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.493.

    PMID: 11532845BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Decision Support Techniques

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Neal Chen
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Neal Chen, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2017

First Posted

June 9, 2017

Study Start

May 13, 2016

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Results First Posted

January 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations