University of North Carolina-Healthwise Partnership Project on Birth Options Decision Aid
B-READY
Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Decision Tool for Cesarean Delivery vs. Trial of Labor
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is pilot quasi-experimental study of women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries who are now pregnant and eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean delivery, to assess whether a decision aid, providing knowledge about trial of labor (VBAC) and planned repeat cesarean delivery can improve the birth options decision-making process for patients. Participants are screened for eligibility through electronic health records. Once an individual is screened eligible, and email invite is sent providing information about the study and assessing the interest in participation. An on-line consent is completed and women are entered sequentially into the usual care group and then through further recruitment, another sample of women are entered into the decision aid group. The primary outcome is satisfaction with the shared decision-making process with their provider.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 16, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 21, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.3 years
August 5, 2019
January 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process score
This is a measure of the patient's involvement in the decision. 1 point is assigned for discussing the pros 'a lot' or 'some'; 1 point is assigned for discussing the cons 'a lot' or 'some'; 1 point is assigned for responding 'yes' if the provider explained the options; and 1 point is assigned for responding 'yes' that the provider asked the patient what treatment she wanted. The tool's score range is 0-4. A higher score indicates more involvement in the decision.
Up to 6 months prior to delivery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants (by category) With the Intent to Deliver by Repeat Cesarean Section or by Vaginal Delivery
Date of Admission
Number of Participants (by category) who Delivered by Repeat Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery
Up to 72 hours after delivery
Maternal or Fetal Complications at Delivery
Up to 72 hours after delivery
Number of Participants (by Category) who desired Repeat Cesarean, Vaginal Delivery or Are Undecided after completion of the study survey
Up to 6 months prior to delivery
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONWomen in this group will undergo usual care and the complete the survey questions on knowledge and involvement in the decision for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or repeat cesarean.
Decision Aid
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen in this group will receive a decision aid prior to undergoing counseling by their physician. Following completion of the decision aid and physician counseling, they will complete a series of survey questions to assess their perceptions of their knowledge and involvement in the decision for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or repeat cesarean delivery.
Interventions
The decision aid is a series of web pages that includes videos, questions, and evidence-based information. The decision aid is designed to help women think about what matters to them and what questions they may have for their doctor or midwife. At the end, they receive a summary of which way they are leaning and what matters most to them.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gestational age between 19/0 and 36/6 weeks
- History of 1 or 2 prior cesarean deliveries
You may not qualify if:
- No contraindications to trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC)
- No history of prior TOLAC
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- Healthwisecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Related Publications (1)
Venkatesh KK, Brodney S, Barry MJ, Jackson J, Lyons KM, Talati AN, Ivester TS, Munoz MC, Thorp JM, Nicholson WK. Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04119-3.
PMID: 34556061DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wanda K Nicholson, MD
Univerisity of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2019
First Posted
August 12, 2019
Study Start
April 16, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available 9 to 36 months following publication of the data as indicated in the section on Plan Description outlined above.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers will respond to letter or email requests from researchers with the plan description outlined in this section.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina.