Impact of Home Exercise Delivery on Compliance & Outcomes for Musculoskeletal Pain
The Impact of Home Exercise Program Delivery Type on Exercise Compliance and Clinical Outcomes for Musculoskeletal Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients seeking care for chronic low back or knee pain will be recruited for enrollment, and randomized within two phases (retention and compliance). Patients will consent to a 2-step study design, with independent randomization for each. The initial step will assess retention based on 4 different exercise prescription strategies. This will be assessed short-term, and then the 2nd step will consist of a second independent randomization to receive different reminder strategies to determine their influence on exercise compliance at home.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.5 years
February 7, 2018
January 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Performance Assessment Tool
A locally developed tool designed to meet the needs of assessing both exercise retention and compliance. It will capture the subject's ability to recall the name of an exercise, the prescribed sets and repetitions, and the ability to perform an exercise using a 4-point ordinal scale
1-month
Compliance
Subjects will be asked to submit self-reported daily compliance logs.
1-month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) 57 (v2.0)
1-month
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
1-month
Self-perception on Physical Health and Ability to Return to Work or Full Duty
1-month
Study Arms (4)
Exercise Amount
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase 1: 2 or 4 exercises.
Type of instruction
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase 1: Handout on paper versus handout and visual demonstration/performance.
Delivery Type
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase 2: Handout vs electronic delivery
Reminder Type
EXPERIMENTALPhase 2: Mobile reminders vs no mobile reminders
Interventions
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The primary complaint of low back pain or knee pain and is not actively seeking care for their contralateral knee.
- The current episode for the injury is 6 weeks or greater
- A home exercise program is appropriate as part of the management plan for their injury on the first day
- Between the age of 18 and 65 years.
- Own and utilize a smart phone
- Read and speak English well enough to interact with the smart phone-based tool.
- Able and willing to come in for follow-up at 1-month.
You may not qualify if:
- History of prior surgery to the lower extremities or spine
- Already receiving or have received treatment for this episode of pain within the past 6 months.
- Medical "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, malignancy, joint infection, or systemic disease
- If participating with low back pain, known current pregnancy or history of pregnancy in the last 6 months
- Exiting military health system in the next 2 months, pending litigation, or pending a medical separation board.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dan Rhonlead
Study Sites (1)
Brooke Army Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78219, United States
Related Publications (6)
Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD005956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2.
PMID: 20091582BACKGROUNDBollen JC, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, Howe TE, Goodwin VA. A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 27;4(6):e005044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005044.
PMID: 24972606BACKGROUNDChou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
PMID: 17909210BACKGROUNDHayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):776-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00014.
PMID: 15867410BACKGROUNDJack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun;15(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
PMID: 20163979BACKGROUNDHolcomb LS. A Taxonomic Integrative Review of Short Message Service (SMS) Methodology: A Framework for Improved Diabetic Outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 30;9(6):1321-6. doi: 10.1177/1932296815585132.
PMID: 25934517BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Rhon, DSc
Brooke Army Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2018
First Posted
March 20, 2018
Study Start
January 12, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
November 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01