Reverse Shoulder Replacement: Formal vs. Home Physiotherapy
Supervised Physiotherapy Versus a Home Exercise Program After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare range of motion between a structured home exercise program to supervised physiotherapy post-operatively after Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement is performed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy/massive cuff tear through a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 12, 2023
CompletedMarch 23, 2023
March 1, 2023
5 years
January 23, 2018
March 22, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Range of Motion Outcomes
Compare change in shoulder range of motion after supervised physiotherapy versus a structured home exercise program after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Clinical Outcome Scores - Quality of Life
Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
Clinical Outcome Scores - Functional
Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 2 months and 24 months post-operatively
Clinical Outcome Scores - Pain
Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
Group I - Formal Therapy
OTHERSupervised physical therapy will be ordered 2 times/week initially for 6 weeks and then tailored to a minimum of 1 visit/week based upon the individual progress of each patient. Home exercises will be provided to the patient by the therapist to be performed daily. Supervised physical therapy will be discontinued once the patient demonstrates independence with the final phase of rehabilitation, which represents the graduated strengthening program.
Group II - Home Therapy
OTHERIn the study group all patients will be instructed in a standardized fashion regarding a home exercise program. This program will involve a standardized a set of five exercises. These exercises will be reviewed with patients in clinic in a standardized fashion and patients will be provided with an instructive hand-out.
Interventions
Patients will be given a set of instructions for completing home therapy for range of motion and strengthening
Patients will be sent to physical therapist for formal treatment to regain range of motion and strengthening exercises
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary RTSA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) or irreparable rotator cuff tear.
- A pre-operative plan for RTSA
- Age \>60
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection
- Incompetent deltoid muscle
- Unwillingness or inability to participate in a home exercise program
- Medically unfit for operative intervention
- Revision RTSA
- RTSA for glenohumeral osteoarthritis or proximal humerus fracture
- Unwillingness to participate in the study
- Inability to read or comprehend written instructions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah - Orthopedics
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
Related Publications (23)
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2249-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994.
PMID: 22258770BACKGROUNDSchairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25440519BACKGROUNDLawrence TM, Ahmadi S, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22365817BACKGROUNDYoung SW, Zhu M, Walker CG, Poon PC. Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):910-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00302.
PMID: 23677358BACKGROUNDGuery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1742-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00851.
PMID: 16882896BACKGROUNDMulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00912.
PMID: 21048173BACKGROUNDSteen BM, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Hussey MM, Cusick MC, Kumar AG, Frankle MA. Outcome and value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
PMID: 25769903BACKGROUNDWall B, Nove-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1476-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00666.
PMID: 17606786BACKGROUNDFavard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y.
PMID: 21384212BACKGROUNDKiet TK, Feeley BT, Naimark M, Gajiu T, Hall SL, Chung TT, Ma CB. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PMID: 25213827BACKGROUNDCazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):535-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22450.
PMID: 20357330BACKGROUNDLevy JC, Badman B. Reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute four-part fracture: tuberosity fixation using a horseshoe graft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 May;25(5):318-24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f22088.
PMID: 21464740BACKGROUNDFrankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1697-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02813.
PMID: 16085607BACKGROUNDChalmers PN, Slikker W 3rd, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Enriquez D, Nicholson GP. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
PMID: 24076000BACKGROUNDCvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Streit JJ, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty on the Dominant Extremity Attain Greater Postoperative ROM. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3221-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4400-0. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
PMID: 26066068BACKGROUNDLevy JC, Everding NG, Gil CC Jr, Stephens S, Giveans MR. Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1872-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PMID: 24981553BACKGROUNDYoung AA, Smith MM, Bacle G, Moraga C, Walch G. Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1915-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00300.
PMID: 22012529BACKGROUNDHattrup SJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reverse shoulder replacement for patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
PMID: 22749484BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Sax FL, MacKenzie CR, Braham RL, Fields SD, Douglas RG Jr. Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it? J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(7):705-12. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90107-x.
PMID: 3110198BACKGROUNDWalch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90232-2.
PMID: 10512449BACKGROUNDKappe T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Elsharkawi M. Reliability of radiologic classification for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun;20(4):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21454101BACKGROUNDSirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024.
PMID: 15125127BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aaron Chamberlain, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- post operative assessor obtaining range of motion and performing physical exam will be blinded to participant's group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2018
First Posted
February 12, 2018
Study Start
January 29, 2018
Primary Completion
January 12, 2023
Study Completion
January 12, 2023
Last Updated
March 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share