Home Exercise vs PT for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Home vs. Physical Therapist-Directed Rehabilitation for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare outcomes between formal clinic based physical therapy (PT) rehabilitation and surgeon directed home therapy (HT) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as measured by pain, range of motion, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) scores at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The secondary objective of this study is to determine if PT rehabilitation following RSA is associated with a higher level of postoperative complications, specifically acromial stress fractures or dislocation. This information will be useful to discern if PT is effective in providing pain relief more quickly, as well as improved motion and self-reported functional outcomes following RSA, which can assist surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in designing optimal care plans for this patient population. The project will also help to clarify if PT services place patients who have RSA at higher risk for acromial stress fractures or dislocation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
6.6 years
October 16, 2018
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Pain: Numerical Rating Scale
Pain measured using 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) with 0 being a better score
up to 2 years postoperatively
Range of motion
Clinician measure of function using active and passive forward elevation, external rotation with the arm at the side in adduction and at 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, and active internal rotation measured by highest vertebral level reached with thumb
up to two years postoperatively
Patient-reported functional outcome- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES). Survey is scored 0 to 100 with 0 being the lowest possible score indicating a poor outcome and 100 being the highest possible score and indicating a good outcome.
up to two years postoperatively
Patient-reported functional outcome- Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. Survey is scored 0 to 100 with 0 being the lowest possible score indicating a poor outcome and 100 being the highest possible score and indicating a good outcome.
up to two years postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complication rates
up to 2 years postoperatively
Cost of Care
up to 2 years after surgery
Quality adjusted life years: PROMIS-29
up to 2 years postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Medication Use Duration
up to two years postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Medication Prescription Refills
up to two years postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Physical Therapy (PT) Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will attend formal physical therapy after surgery.
Home Therapy (HT) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will receive instruction from clinical staff regarding home therapy exercises after surgery.
Interventions
Subjects who will participate in the physical therapy intervention group will attend therapy 4-6 days after discharge from the hospital, and continue in therapy approximately once a week for three months. The physical therapy progression will follow the standard of care developed at Duke Sports Medicine Physical Therapy for rehabilitation following RSA. Some of the patients in the PT intervention cohort may have physical therapy at an institution outside of Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush. All patients, whether in the Rush system or outside, will be given a prescription with the identical instructions for "physical therapy, status post (R/L) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, 1-2 x per week x 12 weeks."
The surgeon/Nurse Practitioner/Physician Assistant will advance rehabilitation exercises and activity guidelines at customary scheduled postoperative appointments for this surgical procedure: 2 weeks (+/- 5 days), 6 weeks (+/- 1 week), 3 months and 6 months (+/- 1 month), and 1 and 2 years (+/- 2 months).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who have RSA for cuff tear arthropathy, massive irreparable rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis, or primary osteoarthritis.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have a non-reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, RSA for fracture, tendon transfers as part of RSA, and revision RSA
- Subjects who had RSA and require discharge to skilled nursing facility, in-patient rehabilitation placement, or use of home health therapy prior to progressing in recovery
- Subjects who cannot speak, read, or write the English language
- Subjects who have cognitive deficits limiting ability to follow directions
- Subjects who have inability to attend physical therapy (i.e. transportation or financial limitations)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Western Orthopaedics
Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics
Leonardtown, Maryland, 20650, United States
New England Baptist Hospital
Dedham, Massachusetts, 02026, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Anderson Orthopedic Clinic
Arlington, Virginia, 22206, United States
Related Publications (9)
Ecklund KJ, Lee TQ, Tibone J, Gupta R. Rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Jun;15(6):340-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200706000-00003.
PMID: 17548883BACKGROUNDSchairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25440519BACKGROUNDBerliner JL, Regalado-Magdos A, Ma CB, Feeley BT. Biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):150-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25441574BACKGROUNDBoileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006.
PMID: 15726075BACKGROUNDSamitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Torrens C, Wright TW. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: Systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):24-31. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.150226.
PMID: 25709242BACKGROUNDFarshad M, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1075-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1125-2. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
PMID: 20865260BACKGROUNDAlentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Torrens C, Wright TW. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 2: Systematic review of reoperations, revisions, problems, and complications. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):60-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.154771.
PMID: 25937717BACKGROUNDBoudreau S, Boudreau ED, Higgins LD, Wilcox RB 3rd. Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;37(12):734-43. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2562. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
PMID: 18560182BACKGROUNDKennedy JS, Reinke EK, Friedman LGM, Cook C, Forsythe B, Gillespie R, Hatzidakis A, Jawa A, Johnston P, Nagda S, Nicholson G, Sears B, Wiesel B, Garrigues GE; SHORT Trial Investigators; Hagen C, Hong I, Roach M, Jones N, Mahendraraj K, Michaelson E, Bader J, Mauter L, Mengers S, Renko N, Strony J, Hart P, Steele E, Naylor A, Gaudette J, Sprengel K. Protocol for a multicenter, randomised controlled trial of surgeon-directed home therapy vs. outpatient rehabilitation by physical therapists for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the SHORT trial. Arch Physiother. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00121-2.
PMID: 34886910DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Grant E Garrigues, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2018
First Posted
October 25, 2018
Study Start
January 22, 2019
Primary Completion
August 11, 2025
Study Completion
December 12, 2025
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share