NCT06104020

Brief Summary

The primary aim of our study is to leverage lung ultrasound to assess and identify postoperative pulmonary complications following shoulder arthroscopic surgery and the implications of the used irrigation fluid.the investigators will further investigate the impact of intraoperative fluid management strategies on these Postoperative pulmonary complications and their effects on hemodynamics. By harnessing the potential of lung ultrasound in this context, we aspire to enhance both the diagnostic capabilities and overall safety of shoulder arthroscopic surgery, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 8, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 27, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • lung ultrasound score (LUS)

    we will Identify postoperative pulmonary complications using the lung ultrasound score (LUS) following shoulder arthroscopic surgery to assess the implications of the used irrigation fluid and The intraoperative Fluid infusion * 0 = normal lung aeration, * 1 = moderate loss of aeration * 2 = severe loss of aeration * 3 = complete loss of lung aeration

    1-One hour before the start of Surgery. 2-Two hours after the End of surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Blood Pressure

    Continuous recording every 15 minutes from the start of the operation until its end, assessed up to the completion of the surgical procedure.

  • Heart Rate

    Continuous recording every 15 minutes from the start of the operation until its end, assessed up to the completion of the surgical procedure.

  • Oxygen Saturation

    Continuous recording every 15 minutes from the start of the operation until its end, assessed up to the completion of the surgical procedure.

  • Vasopressor Used and Dose

    Continuous recording every 15 minutes from the start of the operation until its end, assessed up to the completion of the surgical procedure.

  • Interval for Repeated Dose of the Vasopressor.

    Continuous recording every 15 minutes from the start of the operation until its end, assessed up to the completion of the surgical procedure.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Restrictive fluid group (RG)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The restrictive fluid group (RG) aims to achieve a net zero fluid balance and involves a 2 mL/kg bolus at anesthesia induction, followed by an intraoperative crystalloid infusion at a rate of 4 mL/kg/hr.

Other: Intraoperative fluid management stratigies.

liberal group (LG)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The liberal group (LG) will receive a 10 mL/kg bolus at anesthesia induction, followed by an intraoperative crystalloid infusion at a rate of 8 mL/kg/hr \[12, 13\].

Other: Intraoperative fluid management stratigies.

Interventions

Regimens of different intraoperative fluid management The restrictive fluid group (RG) aims to achieve a net zero fluid balance and involves a 2 mL/kg bolus at anesthesia induction, followed by an intraoperative crystalloid infusion at a rate of 4 mL/kg/hr. The other group of patients, the liberal group (LG), will receive a 10 ml/kg bolus at anesthesia induction,followed by an intraoperative crystalloid infusion at a rate of 8 ml/kg/hr.

Restrictive fluid group (RG)liberal group (LG)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopic surgery.
  • Adults aged 18 years and above.
  • Capable of providing informed consent voluntarily.
  • No known allergies or sensitivities to substances commonly used in the surgical procedure or study.
  • Stable baseline hemodynamics during preoperative evaluation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for open shoulder surgery.
  • Medical Comorbidities:
  • Pulmonary diseases, including chronic pulmonary diseases or pulmonary edema.
  • Previous cardiac diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI), hypertension, and known types of arrhythmia.
  • Severe Organ Disease: Severe liver or kidney disease.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m².
  • Abnormal coagulation function.
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to Participate or Patients who cannot provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment or other reasons.
  • Previous shoulder arthroscopy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (17)

  • Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, Christophi C, Leslie K, McGuinness S, Parke R, Serpell J, Chan MTV, Painter T, McCluskey S, Minto G, Wallace S; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2263-2274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601. Epub 2018 May 9.

    PMID: 29742967BACKGROUND
  • Bhaskar SB, Manjuladevi M. Shoulder arthroscopy and complications: Can we afford to relax? Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;59(6):335-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.158729. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26195827BACKGROUND
  • Bouhemad B, Mongodi S, Via G, Rouquette I. Ultrasound for "lung monitoring" of ventilated patients. Anesthesiology. 2015 Feb;122(2):437-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000558. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25501898BACKGROUND
  • Orebaugh SL. Life-threatening airway edema resulting from prolonged shoulder arthroscopy. Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1456-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200312000-00034. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14639165BACKGROUND
  • Rains DD, Rooke GA, Wahl CJ. Pathomechanisms and complications related to patient positioning and anesthesia during shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

    PMID: 21186092BACKGROUND
  • Saeki N, Kawamoto M. Tracheal obstruction caused by fluid extravasation during shoulder arthroscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Mar;39(2):317-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21485693BACKGROUND
  • Manjuladevi M, Gupta S, Upadhyaya KV, Kutappa AM. Postoperative airway compromise in shoulder arthroscopy: A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;57(1):52-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.108563.

    PMID: 23716767BACKGROUND
  • Jirativanont T, Tritrakarn TD. Upper airway obstruction following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair due to excess irrigation fluid. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Sep;38(5):957-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20872997BACKGROUND
  • Lee HC, Dewan N, Crosby L. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and potentially life-threatening tension pneumothorax. Pulmonary complications from arthroscopic shoulder decompression. Chest. 1992 May;101(5):1265-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.5.1265.

    PMID: 1582282BACKGROUND
  • Ichai C, Ciais JF, Roussel LJ, Levraut J, Candito M, Boileau P, Grimaud D. Intravascular absorption of glycine irrigating solution during shoulder arthroscopy: a case report and follow-up study. Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1481-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00031. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8968197BACKGROUND
  • Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. 'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' perioperative fluid therapy--a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Aug;53(7):843-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02029.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

    PMID: 19519723BACKGROUND
  • Prowle JR, Chua HR, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R. Clinical review: Volume of fluid resuscitation and the incidence of acute kidney injury - a systematic review. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 7;16(4):230. doi: 10.1186/cc11345.

    PMID: 22866958BACKGROUND
  • Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):641-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23.

    PMID: 14578723BACKGROUND
  • Kinsella SM, Tuckey JP. Perioperative bradycardia and asystole: relationship to vasovagal syncope and the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;86(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.6.859.

    PMID: 11573596BACKGROUND
  • D'Alessio JG, Weller RS, Rosenblum M. Activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex in the sitting position for shoulder arthroscopy using interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 1995 Jun;80(6):1158-62. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199506000-00016.

    PMID: 7762845BACKGROUND
  • Myles P, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Wallace S, Peyton P, Christophi C, Story D, Leslie K, Serpell J, McGuinness S, Parke R; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery (RELIEF): rationale and design for a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 3;7(3):e015358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015358.

    PMID: 28259855BACKGROUND
  • Mongodi S, Bouhemad B, Orlando A, Stella A, Tavazzi G, Via G, Iotti GA, Braschi A, Mojoli F. Modified Lung Ultrasound Score for Assessing and Monitoring Pulmonary Aeration. Ultraschall Med. 2017 Oct;38(5):530-537. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120260. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

    PMID: 28291991BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Aia Abdelhameed mohamed

CONTACT

Mohamed Kilany Ali Abdelsalam, M.B.B.Ch/ Ph.D / M.Sc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2023

First Posted

October 27, 2023

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion

November 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share