One-session Treatment for Spider Fears
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the efficacy of exposure and response prevention (ERP) for anxiety and phobias, recent theoretical research on fear extinction via inhibitory learning suggests that cognitive restructuring (CR)--the explicit challenging of maladaptive beliefs (e.g,. overestimation of threat)--may actually attenuate exposure outcomes during an exposure trial. That is, by verbally disputing certain beliefs (e.g., "the spider will jump on me and attack me and I will faint from the anxiety") before an exposure task (e.g., gradually approaching a non-venomous spider), anxious individuals may experience less "surprise" from the non-occurrence of feared outcomes, and consequently experience less inhibitory learning (e.g., learning that spiders are not inherently dangerous). Thus, the investigators aim to empirically test the conventional (yet recently challenged) assumption that cognitive restructuring is a necessary component for psychosocial interventions for phobias. 90 participants recruited from the Psychology Department Participant Pool and the community will participate in this study. All participants will meet DSM-5 criteria for spider phobia. Following consent, participants will complete a pre-test assessment of various aspects of spider phobia. Participants will then receive education about the nature of anxiety/spider phobia and be randomly assigned to one of three 45-min intervention conditions: (a) CR before EXP, (b) EXP before CR, and (c) stress management (a control condition that involves neither CR nor EXP). Following the intervention, participants will complete a 10-minute post-test assessment and be scheduled to return for a follow-up assessment a month later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2020
CompletedMarch 8, 2021
February 1, 2020
2.2 years
January 11, 2018
March 5, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline Behavioral Approach Task (BAT) at 1-month follow-up
The Behavioral Approach Task (BAT) includes 13 rank-ordered steps ranging from standing at the opposite end of a room containing a tarantula enclosed in a closed terrarium covered with a sheet to allowing the tarantula to crawl up one's bare arm. A participant must perform a BAT step for 10 consecutive seconds for the step to count as completed. BAT scores are recorded as the number of the highest step completed. Immediately after completing each step of the BAT (at the baseline and post-treatment assessments), participants are asked to verbally report their (a) anxiety and (b) disgust, using a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (maximum).
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
Change from baseline Spider Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ) at 1-month follow-up
The SBQ is a 78-item scale measuring one's concerns related to encounters with spiders. Items are rated on a 0-100 scale (0= I do not believe it at all (0%); 100= I absolutely believe it (100%)). Total scores range from 0-7800. Higher scores indicate more negative beliefs about spiders.
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
Change from baseline Spider Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES) at 1-month follow-up
The Spider Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES) is a self-report measure of the strength of self-efficacy about performing behaviors related to spiders. The scale consists of 26 items describing approach behaviors towards spiders, on which respondents rate the strength of their self-efficacy about performing that behavior on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no confidence/highly uncertain) to 10 (total confidence/complete certainty). Total scores range from 0 to 260. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change from baseline Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) at 1-month follow-up
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
Change from baseline Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) at 0-5 hours post-treatment
Baseline, 0-5 hours post-treatment
Change from baseline Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) at 1-month follow-up
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
Change from baseline Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) at 0-5 hours post-treatment
Baseline, 0-5 hours post-treatment
Change from baseline Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) at 1-month follow-up
Baseline, 1-month follow-up
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
CR-EXP
EXPERIMENTALCognitive restructuring before exposure with response prevention (45 minute intervention).
EXP-CR
EXPERIMENTALExposure with response prevention before cognitive restructuring (45 minute intervention).
Stress Management
ACTIVE COMPARATORStress management skills.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must
- be 18 years or older,
- be fluent in English, and
- meet DSM-5 criteria for specific (spider) phobia to be considered eligible
You may not qualify if:
- are allergic to spiders or bee stings,
- are experiencing current psychosis, mania, or substance abuse, or
- successfully complete 10 of 13 possible BAT steps in the pretreatment appointment (to ensure that participants are indeed spider phobic at pretreatment).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jon Abramowitz, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors are prevented from having knowledge of the interventions assigned to individual participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2018
First Posted
January 25, 2018
Study Start
January 20, 2018
Primary Completion
April 8, 2020
Study Completion
April 8, 2020
Last Updated
March 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-02