NCT03408535

Brief Summary

The study will assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale clinical trial of the effectiveness of an online rehabilitation program for adults living with hearing loss. The program aims to help people use their hearing aid(s) and interact in social settings more effectively. The program is made up of 5 modules that cover different topics, such as hearing aids, communication strategies, and relaxation techniques.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
83

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 21, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 11, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

eHealthOnline RehabilitationHearing ProblemsAdultHearing Aids

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE: Ventry & Weinstein, 1982)

    A 25-item questionnaire designed to assess the effects of hearing loss on the emotional (n = 13), and social/situational adjustment (n = 12) of older people, scored using a three-point scale (4 = yes; 2 = sometimes; 0 = no).

    Change from Baseline following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA: Cox & Alexander, 2002)

    Baseline and following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention

  • Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP: Gatehouse, 1999)

    Baseline (Part 1 only) and following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention (Part 2 only)

  • Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire (SPaRQ: Heffernan et al., 2016)

    Baseline and following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention

  • Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA: West & Smith, 2007)

    Baseline and following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention

  • Practical Hearing Aid Skills Test (PHAST: Desjardins & Doherty, 2009)

    Baseline and following up to 5 weeks of independent use of the online intervention

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Eriksholm Guide to Better Hearing

OTHER

The Eriksholm Guide to Better Hearing is an online rehabilitation program. The program is made up of 5-weekly modules that cover different topics. Each module includes self-studies, training, and professional video coaching in hearing loss, hearing aids, and communication strategies.

Other: Eriksholm Guide to Better Hearing

Interventions

Online rehabilitation program.

Eriksholm Guide to Better Hearing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to give informed consent
  • English as first spoken language or good understanding of English.
  • Adults aged ≥18 years (no upper age limit)
  • Mild-to-moderate hearing loss (average hearing threshold across octave frequencies 0.25-4kHz ≥20 and ≤70dB HL)
  • Have either:
  • Used hearing aids for at least one year (existing hearing aid users), or
  • Have not used hearing aids or an alternative form of amplification (e.g. personal sound amplification products) within the past two years (first-time hearing aid users)
  • Access the Internet and compatible device (e.g. computer or tablet device).

You may not qualify if:

  • Report having severe tinnitus
  • Diagnosis of Ménière's disease
  • Patients who are unable to complete the questionnaires without assistance due to age- related problems such as cognitive decline and dementia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre

Nottingham, Non-US/Non-Canadian, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Thoren ES, Oberg M, Wanstrom G, Andersson G, Lunner T. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of online rehabilitative intervention for adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2014 Jul;53(7):452-61. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.892643. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

    PMID: 24749664BACKGROUND
  • Thoren E, Svensson M, Tornqvist A, Andersson G, Carlbring P, Lunner T. Rehabilitative online education versus internet discussion group for hearing aid users: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 May;22(5):274-85. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.5.4.

    PMID: 21756843BACKGROUND
  • Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982 May-Jun;3(3):128-34. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006.

    PMID: 7095321BACKGROUND
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002 Jan;41(1):30-5. doi: 10.3109/14992020209101309.

    PMID: 12467367BACKGROUND
  • Gatehouse S. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of client-centred outcome measures for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(2):80-103.

    BACKGROUND
  • Heffernan E, Coulson N, Henshaw H, Barry J, Ferguson MA. The development of a measure of participation in adults with hearing loss: a qualitative study of expert views. Trials. 2015;16(Suppl 1):30.

    BACKGROUND
  • West RL, Smith SL. Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Audiol. 2007 Dec;46(12):759-71. doi: 10.1080/14992020701545898.

    PMID: 18049965BACKGROUND
  • Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly? Am J Audiol. 2009 Jun;18(1):69-76. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0022). Epub 2009 Apr 20.

    PMID: 19380509BACKGROUND
  • Ferguson M, Brandreth M, Brassington W, Wharrad H. Information Retention and Overload in First-Time Hearing Aid Users: An Interactive Multimedia Educational Solution. Am J Audiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):329-32. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0088.

    PMID: 26649541BACKGROUND
  • Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2006. Retrieved from: https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing LossHearing Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ear DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: A single-centre feasibility study of a clinical study with one arm (intervention-only). A before and after intervention design will be used. A sub-group of participants will take part in a qualitative follow-up session.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2018

First Posted

January 24, 2018

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 21, 2018

Study Completion

April 30, 2018

Last Updated

October 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations