A Comparative, Controlled, Clinical Investigation and Quality Control of a New Hearing Aid
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the hearing aid under laboratory as well as everyday conditions. In addition, the performance data of the hearing aid are compared with a Bernafon hearing aid already available on the market. The hearing aids are adapted according to the user requirements. The data collected in the study is intended to show that the benefit of the hearing aid being examined is identical or better than the current CE-marked hearing aid. A further aim is to improve the adaptation of the hearing device in such a way that the benefit for people with hearing impairments can be increased.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 6, 2019
CompletedNovember 6, 2019
October 1, 2019
4 months
March 9, 2017
November 16, 2017
November 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Speech Intelligibility Performance
Speech test scores will be measured with speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of speech in noise in three conditions: unaided, aided with the current device, and aided with the new device. The score is measured by the the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which 50% of words in a sentence list are correctly repeated. The speech is always presented at 65 dB and the background noise varies to maintain the 50% correct. A lower SNR score indicates a better score. The maximum score will be 15 dB and the minimum will be -5 dB.
2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Subjective Performance of Aided Benefit
A 2 week time period during which they will wear the devices and answer questionnaires about the experience.
Speech Intelligibility Performance With New Feature
2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.
Handling/Usability Performance
2 hour period of usability testing with tasks and questionnaires.
Events
A 2 hour period of interviews and questionnaires after having worn the devices for approximately 2 weeks and keeping a diary to make notes of device behavior.
Study Arms (1)
Successor hearing aid to Juna
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is the new device which is the successor to the Juna device. The participants will use their current device as a control. The will wear the intervention device for approximately two weeks.
Interventions
The participants will all be experienced hearing instrument device users and will be switched from their current (control) devices to the new test device which succeeds the Juna device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All classifications of hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, mixed)
- If the hearing loss is conductive or mixed it must be approved for amplification by a physician
- All shapes of hearing loss (flat, sloping, reverse slope, notch)
- Severity ranging from mild to severe
- German speaking
- Ability and willingness to sign the consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications for amplification
- Active ear disease
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, or other cognitive problems of the participant,
- A reduced mobility making them unable to attend weekly study appointments
- A reduced ability to describe auditory impressions and the usage of the hearing aids
- Uncooperative so that it is not possible to record a valid pure tone audiogram
- A strongly reduced dexterity
- Central hearing disorders
- Bernafon employees
- Family members of Bernafon employees
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bernafon AGlead
Study Sites (1)
Bernafon AG
Bern, 3018, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julie Tantau
- Organization
- Bernafon AG
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara Simon, AuD
Bernafon AG
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The hardware will be obviously different from the control devices and impossible to blind.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2017
First Posted
March 22, 2017
Study Start
March 13, 2017
Primary Completion
June 28, 2017
Study Completion
June 28, 2017
Last Updated
November 6, 2019
Results First Posted
November 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual data will not be shared.