NCT03395106

Brief Summary

Views on vaccines range from those who are strongly supportive to those who are stridently opposed and will not budge from identity-based core beliefs about vaccines. In between these poles are numerous others who can delay, be reluctant (but still accept), or refuse/accept some vaccines for their children but not others. It is for these vaccine-hesitant parents that constitute the 'middle ground' of this spectrum where the most immediate and productive gains can be made towards enhancing vaccination acceptance and improving uptake. However, navigating this noisy communications environment is difficult, given the array of confusing and conflicting information available from multiple and competing sources. To date, there is no consensus on how best to use communication to respond to vaccine hesitancy. Building on two Canada-wide surveys of parents, the goal of this research is to identify which communication strategies show the greatest impact in reducing parental vaccine hesitancy and improving vaccination intentions. The specific objectives are to:

  1. 1.Develop and pre-test four variations of news media stories that vary by source (parent versus physician) and content (intuitive versus deliberative);
  2. 2.Examine the impact of vaccine hesitant parents' exposure to vaccine communications that vary in source (parent versus physician) and content (intuitive versus deliberative) on primary (vaccine hesitant attitudes) and secondary (vaccine intentions) outcomes; and
  3. 3.Explore which media story variation may be more effective in improving vaccination attitudes and intentions for different parental decision-making styles (deliberative versus intuitive).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
883

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2017

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 9, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 9, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 9, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 12, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

vaccinepublic health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Vaccine Hesitancy

    Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV). The PACV is a validated 15 question survey on vaccine hesitancy.

    Change in baseline measured up to 1 day after content delivery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Intention to Vaccinate

    Change in baseline measured up to 1 day after content delivery

Study Arms (4)

Parent source + intuitive story content

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Parent sourceBehavioral: Intuitive content

Doctor source + intuitive story content

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Doctor sourceBehavioral: Intuitive content

Parent source + deliberative content

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Parent sourceBehavioral: Deliberative content

Doctor source + deliberative content

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Doctor sourceBehavioral: Deliberative content

Interventions

Parent sourceBEHAVIORAL

Having a parent feature prominently in a news story

Parent source + deliberative contentParent source + intuitive story content
Doctor sourceBEHAVIORAL

Having a doctor feature prominently in a news story

Doctor source + deliberative contentDoctor source + intuitive story content

News story content includes process of weighing the risks/benefits of vaccinating, the importance of vaccines for community protection, and concludes with a recommendation to vaccinate.

Doctor source + deliberative contentParent source + deliberative content

News story content focuses on the consequences of not vaccinating (including vaccine preventable diseases) and the decisional regret.

Doctor source + intuitive story contentParent source + intuitive story content

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Parents over 18 living in Canada with a YOUNGEST child is less than 24 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Parents who have a YOUNGEST child older than 24 months
  • A parent who is pregnant, before the first trimester is complete

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2M 3Y9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Pachur T, Spaar, M. Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4:303-311, 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Opel DJ, Taylor JA, Zhou C, Catz S, Myaing M, Mangione-Smith R. The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: a validation study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Nov;167(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2483.

    PMID: 24061681BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vaccination Hesitancy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vaccination RefusalTreatment RefusalTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Michelle Driedger, PhD

    University of Manitoba

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Statisticians completing the analysis of the primary outcome will be blinded.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Factorial design 2x2
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2017

First Posted

January 10, 2018

Study Start

July 9, 2018

Primary Completion

November 9, 2018

Study Completion

November 9, 2018

Last Updated

October 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations