Public Health Messages to Address Vaccine Hesitancy
Developing and Evaluating Public Health Messages to Address Vaccine Hesitancy
1 other identifier
interventional
883
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Views on vaccines range from those who are strongly supportive to those who are stridently opposed and will not budge from identity-based core beliefs about vaccines. In between these poles are numerous others who can delay, be reluctant (but still accept), or refuse/accept some vaccines for their children but not others. It is for these vaccine-hesitant parents that constitute the 'middle ground' of this spectrum where the most immediate and productive gains can be made towards enhancing vaccination acceptance and improving uptake. However, navigating this noisy communications environment is difficult, given the array of confusing and conflicting information available from multiple and competing sources. To date, there is no consensus on how best to use communication to respond to vaccine hesitancy. Building on two Canada-wide surveys of parents, the goal of this research is to identify which communication strategies show the greatest impact in reducing parental vaccine hesitancy and improving vaccination intentions. The specific objectives are to:
- 1.Develop and pre-test four variations of news media stories that vary by source (parent versus physician) and content (intuitive versus deliberative);
- 2.Examine the impact of vaccine hesitant parents' exposure to vaccine communications that vary in source (parent versus physician) and content (intuitive versus deliberative) on primary (vaccine hesitant attitudes) and secondary (vaccine intentions) outcomes; and
- 3.Explore which media story variation may be more effective in improving vaccination attitudes and intentions for different parental decision-making styles (deliberative versus intuitive).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2018
CompletedOctober 10, 2019
October 1, 2019
4 months
December 12, 2017
October 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Vaccine Hesitancy
Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV). The PACV is a validated 15 question survey on vaccine hesitancy.
Change in baseline measured up to 1 day after content delivery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Intention to Vaccinate
Change in baseline measured up to 1 day after content delivery
Study Arms (4)
Parent source + intuitive story content
EXPERIMENTALDoctor source + intuitive story content
EXPERIMENTALParent source + deliberative content
EXPERIMENTALDoctor source + deliberative content
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Having a parent feature prominently in a news story
Having a doctor feature prominently in a news story
News story content includes process of weighing the risks/benefits of vaccinating, the importance of vaccines for community protection, and concludes with a recommendation to vaccinate.
News story content focuses on the consequences of not vaccinating (including vaccine preventable diseases) and the decisional regret.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents over 18 living in Canada with a YOUNGEST child is less than 24 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Parents who have a YOUNGEST child older than 24 months
- A parent who is pregnant, before the first trimester is complete
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Manitobalead
- Canadian Immunization Research Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2M 3Y9, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Pachur T, Spaar, M. Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4:303-311, 2015.
BACKGROUNDOpel DJ, Taylor JA, Zhou C, Catz S, Myaing M, Mangione-Smith R. The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: a validation study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Nov;167(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2483.
PMID: 24061681BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Driedger, PhD
University of Manitoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Statisticians completing the analysis of the primary outcome will be blinded.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2017
First Posted
January 10, 2018
Study Start
July 9, 2018
Primary Completion
November 9, 2018
Study Completion
November 9, 2018
Last Updated
October 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10