BurstDR™ micrOdosing stimuLation in De-novo Patients
BOLD
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of microdosing BurstDR stimulation in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with chronic intractable back and/or leg pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 19, 2020
CompletedMarch 19, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.7 years
November 10, 2017
February 24, 2020
March 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Visual Analog Scale Pain (VAS) Scores Between Baseline and Trial Stimulation
Pain questionnaire - (Scale is 0-100 mm with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning worst pain imaginable)
baseline and 1 week after trial lead implant (trial stimulation)
Change in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores Between Baseline and Follow up 1
Pain questionnaire - (Scale is 0-100 mm with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning worst pain imaginable)
Baseline and 1 month follow up visit
Change in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores Between Baseline and Follow up 2
Pain questionnaire - (Scale is 0-100 mm with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning worst pain imaginable)
Baseline and 3 month follow up visit
Change in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores Between Baseline and Follow up 3
Pain questionnaire - (Scale is 0-100 mm with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning worst pain imaginable)
Baseline and 6 month follow up visit
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and Trial Stimulation
Baseline and 1 week after trial lead implant (trial stimulation)
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and Follow up 1
Baseline and 1 month follow up visit
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and Follow up 2
Baseline and 3 month follow up visit
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and Follow up 3
Baseline and 6 month follow up visit
Change in Disability Index Between Baseline and Trial Stimulation
Baseline and 1 week after trial lead implant (trial stimulation)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Stimulation ON/OFF Ratio
6 month follow up visit
Study Arms (1)
Microdosing group
EXPERIMENTALStimulation will be delivered at with different microdosing setting to identify the optimal parameter values for each patient.
Interventions
BurstDR spinal cord stimulation will be delivered with different ON/OFF periods to identify the best setting for each patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is able to provide informed consent to participate in the study;
- Subject diagnosed with chronic intractable pain associated with back and/or limbs;
- Subject is 18 years of age or older;
- Subject has failed to respond to at least 6 months of conventional treatment which may include pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, epidural injections;
- Subject has a back and/or leg pain intensity of at least 6.0 cm out of 10.0 cm on the average back and/or leg pain visual analogue scale at baseline;
- Subject's medical record has been evaluated by the Investigator to ensure that the subject is a good candidate for a neurostimulation system;
- Subject is on stable pain medications with a total opioid for at least 28 days prior to enrolling in this study, and is willing to stay on those medications with no dose increase until the 3 month visit;
- Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including compliance with the regimen and completion of all office visits;
- Female candidates of child-bearing potential agree to commit to the use of an effective method of contraception (including but not limited to sterilization, barrier devices, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), condoms, rhythm method, or abstinence) for the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease, post-herpetic neuralgia or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
- Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm;
- Subject has been implanted with or participated in a trial period for a neurostimulation system;
- Subject has an infusion pump;
- Subject has evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder as determined as per standard of care;
- Subject has a current diagnosis of a progressive neurological disease as determined by the Investigator;
- Subject is immunocompromised;
- Subject has an existing medical condition that is likely to require repetitive MRI evaluation in the future (i.e. epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, acoustic neuroma, tumor);
- Subject has history of cancer requiring active treatment in the last 12 months;
- Subject has an existing medical condition that is likely to require the use of diathermy in the future;
- Subject has documented history of allergic response to titanium or silicone;
- Subject has a documented history of substance abuse (narcotics, alcohol, etc.) or substance dependency in the 6 months prior to baseline data collection;
- Subject is a female candidates of child bearing potential that are pregnant (confirmed by positive urine/blood pregnancy test);
- Subject has life expectancy of less than 6 months;
- Subject is involved in an injury claim under current litigation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Thrive Clinic
Santa Rosa, California, 95403, United States
Nevada advanced pain specialists
Reno, Nevada, 89511, United States
OnSite Clinical Solutions
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803, United States
Ambulatory Surgery Center of Killeen
Killeen, Texas, 76542, United States
Premier Pain Solutions
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Filippo Agnesi
- Organization
- Abbott
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy R Deer, MD
The Center for Pain Relief
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2017
First Posted
November 22, 2017
Study Start
October 30, 2017
Primary Completion
July 2, 2019
Study Completion
July 2, 2019
Last Updated
March 19, 2020
Results First Posted
March 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share