Spinal Segment MRI Perfusion and Diffusion Response to Spinal Manipulation in Low Back Pain Patients
MRI-quantified Changes in Perfusion and Diffusion in Spinal Segments After High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Spinal Manipulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective is to quantify changes in diffusion and perfusion in the intervertebral disc and adjacent spinal muscle tissue of a spinal segment receiving a spinal manipulative or control intervention using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) (DWI, used for quantifying diffusion) and intravoxel incoherent motion MRI (IVIM, used for quantifying perfusion). Additional objectives are to test if clinical parameters such as pain and disability, radiological parameters, or pain-related inflammatory parameters in venous blood have predictive value in relation to these perfusion and diffusion effects, and if these effects correlate to clinical outcome. An additional objective is to test the repeatability of IVIM-MRI in assessing perfusion changes in musculoskeletal tissue, and, as a positive control, assessing diurnal changes in perfusion and diffusion parameters in spinal tissue of healthy controls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
5.2 years
December 6, 2018
August 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Change
Computed on diffusion-weighted MRI, refers to the mean diffusion in a voxel (on MRI). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is measured in the intervertebral disc and adjacent spinal muscle tissue in patients before and after an SMT- or control intervention and in controls before and after 20 minutes of lying supine. The computed difference is the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Change.
Measured on day 1 during the study
Capillary Perfusion Change
Also called pseudodiffusion or D\*. Measured on IVIM-MRI in square millimeters per second. Perfusion in capillaries in spinal muscle tissue is measured in patients before and after an SMT- or control intervention and in controls before and after 20 minutes of lying supine. The computed difference equals the Capillary Perfusion Change.
Measured on day 1 during the study
Diffusion Change
Measured on diffusion-weighted MRI in square millimeters per second. Diffusion (D) in intra- and extracellular compartments in the intervertebral disc and adjacent spinal muscle tissue is measured in patients before and after an SMT- or control intervention and in controls before and after 20 minutes of lying supine. The computed difference is the Diffusion Change.
Measured on day 1 during the study
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (Control)
Measured approximately 9 hours after the first MRI, during the study
Change in Capillary Perfusion (Control)
Measured approximately 9 hours after the first MRI, during the study
Diffusion change
Measured approximately 9 hours after the first MRI, during the study
Other Outcomes (8)
Pfirrmann-Grade
Measured on day 1, during the study
Weishaupt-Grade
Measured on day 1, during the study
Inflammatory Parameters (interleukins)
Measured on day 1, during the study, and up to 12 months after
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patient
SHAM COMPARATOR25 Patients will receive a spinal manipulative therapy Intervention, the other 25 Patients receive a sham Intervention.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention
Interventions
The patient lies in sidelying position, with the hip of the upper leg flexed to 90° and the foot of the flexed leg hooked behind the popliteal space of the downside leg. The chiropractor faces the subject at a 45°-angle, fixates the flexed knee with his own knee/thigh. The fingers of the cephalic hand reach under the patient's upper arm to contact the upside lateral surface of the superior spinous process. The fingers of the caudal hand hook down-side aspect of the spinous process, the forearm contacts the patient's buttock and thigh. The cephalic hand thrusts lateromedially and caudocranially, from upside toward downside (push). The caudal hand thrusts lateromedially in the opposing direction, from downside toward upside (pull). SMT is repeated after the patient turns to left side lying.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients:
- Persons over 18 years and under 75 years of age with low back pain of any duration clinically not attributable to "red flags" (infection, trauma, fractures, inflammatory illnesses).
- Source of LBP clinically at the L4/5 or L5/S1 segment.
- Duration of LBP is longer than 4 weeks
- Obtained informed consent.
- Controls:
- Persons over 18 years and under 75 years of age who have not suffered from low back pain in the last year and have never experienced low back pain for longer than 7 consecutive days.
- Obtained informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects are excluded from enrolment if they
- have undergone prior spinal surgery
- have undergone facet joint, epidural or periradicular injections in the last 6 months
- had a spinal manipulative therapy intervention in the past 2 weeks
- have spinal abnormalities (benign or malignant tumors, congenital abnormalities, isthmic spondylolisthesis)
- have any contraindication to spinal manipulative interventions or are deemed unable to tolerate SMT to both body sides (e.g. pain attributable to above mentioned red flags, inability to perform side-lying without pain, radiculopathy with motor deficits \<M4-, severe spinal canal stenosis)
- have any contraindication to MRI (e.g. heart pacemaker, metallic foreign body or claustrophobia)
- have started a new prescription medication targeting blood circulation within the last 3 months
- are pregnant or nursing
- Subjects are excluded from venipuncture if they are known to be HIV-positive or have Hepatitis A, B, or C or have another systemic infection (excludes subjects from venipuncture). No study specific testing for HIV or Hepatitis A, B or C is performed.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Balgrist University Hospitallead
- Verein Pro Chiropraktikcollaborator
- Balgrist Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Balgrist
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Related Publications (6)
Beattie PF, Butts R, Donley JW, Liuzzo DM. The within-session change in low back pain intensity following spinal manipulative therapy is related to differences in diffusion of water in the intervertebral discs of the upper lumbar spine and L5-S1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;44(1):19-29. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4967. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24261925BACKGROUNDLe Bihan D. What can we see with IVIM MRI? Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 15;187:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.062. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PMID: 29277647BACKGROUNDNguyen A, Ledoux JB, Omoumi P, Becce F, Forget J, Federau C. Application of intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging to shoulder muscles after a lift-off test of varying duration. NMR Biomed. 2016 Jan;29(1):66-73. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3449.
PMID: 26684052BACKGROUNDWong AY, Parent EC, Dhillon SS, Prasad N, Kawchuk GN. Do participants with low back pain who respond to spinal manipulative therapy differ biomechanically from nonresponders, untreated controls or asymptomatic controls? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 1;40(17):1329-37. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000981.
PMID: 26020851BACKGROUNDKlyne DM, Barbe MF, Hodges PW. Systemic inflammatory profiles and their relationships with demographic, behavioural and clinical features in acute low back pain. Brain Behav Immun. 2017 Feb;60:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PMID: 27720935BACKGROUNDChou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
PMID: 17909210BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Petra Schweinhardt, PhD, MD
Balgrist University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of Investigator to type of Intervention Blinding of Outcome assesors during follow-up.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2018
First Posted
March 19, 2019
Study Start
March 6, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share