Transitioning to a Valve -Gated Intrathecal Drug Delivery System
TRANSIT
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This study is designed to explore if the valve-gated pump requires less drug to manage subject pain than the prior standard peristaltic pump in the same subject. The newly implanted valve-gated pump will be programmed to deliver a minimum dose reduction of 20% of the same medication that was delivered in the peristaltic pump prior to explant. The drug therapy will be evaluated and pain scores will be evaluated over time (3 refill cycles prospectively for the valve-gated pump and 6 months retrospectively for the peristaltic pump).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
July 1, 2021
2.7 years
March 16, 2020
July 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduced pain medication through Prometra Implantable Pump System
Total consumption of pain medications both oral and intrathecal is recorded to show changes.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analog Scale for Pain changes
12 months
Owestry Disability Index changes
12 months
Global Pain Scale Assessments
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Prometra Programmable Pump
ACTIVE COMPARATORPain scores and drug doses will be prospectively collected for valve-gated Prometra® Programmable Pump system(Flowonix Medical)' at (refills 1-3) and will be compared to 3 months retrospectively collected pain scores (VAS, ODI and Global Pain Scale Assessments) and drug doses prior to peristaltic pump explant.
Retrospective records for peristaltic pump
NO INTERVENTIONPrior pain scores and drug doses from the patients who need a new valve gated pump will be recorded and used for comparison after it is changed.
Interventions
This valve gated Prometra II Programmable Pump system will be replacing prior peristaltic Synchromed II pump
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be eligible for enrollment in the study:
- years of age or older
- Provide written informed consent for study participation
- Active existing peristaltic intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS)
- Stable IDDS dosage and concentration for at least 6 weeks prior to valve-gated pump implant
- Minimum of 3 months of information from the following:
- VAS, ODI, Global Pain Scale
- Pump refill printouts (dosage and concentration)
- Other Interventions for pain (injections, nerve blocks, etc.)
- Estimated Replacement Indicator (ERI) printout required showing \< 12 months of battery life
- Catheter Access Procedure (CAP) study performed to document patency of catheter, if not replacing
- Diagnosis of nonmalignant, chronic intractable pain as documented in medical history
- Appropriate candidate for surgery
- Able to comply with study requirements including visits and assessments, in the opinion of the investigator
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Any contraindications listed in the Prometra labeling
- Significant pain disorder not intended to be treated with the test device or comparator
- Terminally ill, malignant cancer diagnosis and/or has a life expectancy of less than 12 months in the opinion of the investigator
- Pregnant/lactating woman or is of child-bearing potential and not utilizing effective birth control.
- Systemic or local infection (contraindicated for pump implantation)
- History/evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition with potential to impact compliance with study visits and assessments, in the investigator's opinion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bux, Anjum, MDlead
- Flowonix Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Pain and Spine Specialists
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Crimson Pain Management
Overland Park, Kansas, 66209, United States
Bux Pain Management
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509, United States
Aust Interventional Pain
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458, United States
Michigan Head & Spine Institute
Southfield, Michigan, 48034, United States
National Spine & Pain Center
Turnersville, New Jersey, 08012, United States
The Spine Center at Ridgeway
Rochester, New York, 14626, United States
Consultants in Pain Management
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421, United States
Related Publications (6)
Knight KH, Brand FM, Mchaourab AS, Veneziano G. Implantable intrathecal pumps for chronic pain: highlights and updates. Croat Med J. 2007 Feb;48(1):22-34.
PMID: 17309136BACKGROUNDDeer TR, Smith HS, Cousins M, Doleys DM, Levy RM, Rathmell JP, Staats PS, Wallace M, Webster LR. Consensus guidelines for the selection and implantation of patients with noncancer pain for intrathecal drug delivery. Pain Physician. 2010 May-Jun;13(3):E175-213.
PMID: 20495597BACKGROUNDHayek SM, Deer TR, Pope JE, Panchal SJ, Patel VB. Intrathecal therapy for cancer and non-cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):219-48.
PMID: 21587327BACKGROUNDHayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Intrathecal Hydromorphone and Bupivacaine Combination Therapy for Post-Laminectomy Syndrome Optimized with Patient-Activated Bolus Device. Pain Med. 2016 Mar;17(3):561-571. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv021. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
PMID: 26814257BACKGROUNDKonrad PE, Huffman JM, Stearns LM, Plunkett RJ, Grigsby EJ, Stromberg EK, Roediger MP, Wells MD, Weaver TW. Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS): The Implantable Systems Performance Registry (ISPR). Neuromodulation. 2016 Dec;19(8):848-856. doi: 10.1111/ner.12524. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PMID: 27730704BACKGROUNDTangen KM, Leval R, Mehta AI, Linninger AA. Computational and In Vitro Experimental Investigation of Intrathecal Drug Distribution: Parametric Study of the Effect of Injection Volume, Cerebrospinal Fluid Pulsatility, and Drug Uptake. Anesth Analg. 2017 May;124(5):1686-1696. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002011.
PMID: 28431428BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anjum Bux, MD
Owner
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- subject will be blinded to dosing decreases and increases
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2020
First Posted
March 18, 2020
Study Start
July 27, 2020
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share