Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Symptoms in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers Following Application of Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator Versus Control
Randomized, Double-arm, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Symptoms in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers Following Application of Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator Versus Control (CORIANDER)
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the increase in comfort and comfortable contact lens (CL) wear time associated with application of TrueTear (active intranasal neurostimulation) compared with application of TrueTear sham control (intranasal application which is not electrically active) in symptomatic CL wearers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 29, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 6, 2019
CompletedDecember 18, 2019
December 1, 2019
1 year
October 3, 2017
November 19, 2019
December 16, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score in the Study Eye
The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst). The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Day 28
Comfort Rating Score in the Study Eye
The participant assessed contact lens comfort in the study eye using a 100 point scale where a score of 0=Extremely uncomfortable and a score of 100=Extremely comfortable. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
CL Insertion, After 2 hours and the End of Day on Day 24
Comfortable Wear Time (CWT) in the Study Eye
CWT was calculated by taking the difference between the time participants reported started to find their CLs getting uncomfortable and the reported insertion time for that day. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Day 24
Total Wear Time (Total WT) in the Study Eye
Total WT was calculated by taking the difference between the time participants reported removing their CLs and the reported insertion time for that day. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Day 24
Study Arms (2)
TrueTear
EXPERIMENTALTrueTear Device (Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator) was used intranasally on contact lens (CL) wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if the participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
TrueTear Sham Control
SHAM COMPARATORTrueTear sham device, which is not electrically active and has limited tip insertion depth, was used intranasally on CL wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
Interventions
TrueTear Device (Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator) was used intranasally on CL wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if the participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
TrueTear sham device, which is not electrically active and has limited tip insertion depth, was used intranasally on CL wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In at least one eye, has a cotton swab nasal stimulation Schirmer test score at least 4 mm greater than 3 minute Schirmer with anesthesia basal score in the same eye at the Screening Visit
- Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer and currently wears lenses an average of at least 2 days per week, with an average minimum wearing time of 3 hours each day over the past month and is able and willing to wear lenses for at least 6 hours on four study day visits
- Has at least 20/40 visual acuity in both eyes with CL correction
- Is symptomatic according to Young's categorization
You may not qualify if:
- Refractive error surgery
- Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that may increase the risk of bleeding
- History of nasal or sinus surgery
- Vascularized polyp, deviated septum or severe nasal airway obstruction at the Screening visit
- Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other active implanted metallic or active implanted electronic device in the head
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Contact Lens Research School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michelle Senchyna
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2017
First Posted
October 30, 2017
Study Start
November 22, 2017
Primary Completion
November 29, 2018
Study Completion
November 29, 2018
Last Updated
December 18, 2019
Results First Posted
December 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12