Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation
Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Masked, Cross-Over Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dry Eye Symptoms With Application of the Oculeve Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator During Exposure to a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®)
1 other identifier
interventional
185
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) relating to symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment model.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 31, 2020
CompletedJanuary 31, 2020
January 1, 2020
1 month
September 20, 2016
November 27, 2019
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The participant rated their eye dryness (both eyes simultaneously) at all visits and every 5 minutes during CAE exposure by placing a vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal line to indicate the level of eye dryness. 0 corresponds to "no dryness" and 100 corresponds to "maximal dryness". A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A cross-over linear model was used with symptom relief as the response variable; sequence, application location, period, and the application location by period interaction as fixed effects; and participant (sequence) as a random effect.
Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score
Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal Application
EXPERIMENTALIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally device (active), intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure.
Extranasal Application
SHAM COMPARATORIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator device applied extranasally (control) for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure.
Interventions
The device delivers small electrical currents, activating nerves that stimulate the body's natural tear production system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Moderate to severe dry eye disease
- Normal lid/lash anatomy, blinking function and closure as determined by the Investigator
- Literate, able to speak English, and able to complete questionnaires independently
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to risk of clinically significant increased bleeding
- Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma to these areas
- Implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator
- Corneal transplant in either or both eyes
- A woman who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy at the Screening Visit
- Be currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or have used an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (3)
Eye Care Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40206, United States
Total Eye Care, PA
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Nashville Vision Associates
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Intranasal and Extranasal data for this crossover study are combined because there is only access to combined arm data for this study. The study was acquired from another organization and limited results data are available.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area, Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michelle Senchyna
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2016
First Posted
September 22, 2016
Study Start
September 30, 2016
Primary Completion
October 31, 2016
Study Completion
October 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 31, 2020
Results First Posted
January 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share