NCT02910713

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) relating to symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment model.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
185

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2016

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

September 20, 2016

Results QC Date

November 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The participant rated their eye dryness (both eyes simultaneously) at all visits and every 5 minutes during CAE exposure by placing a vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal line to indicate the level of eye dryness. 0 corresponds to "no dryness" and 100 corresponds to "maximal dryness". A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A cross-over linear model was used with symptom relief as the response variable; sequence, application location, period, and the application location by period interaction as fixed effects; and participant (sequence) as a random effect.

    Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score

    Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Intranasal Application

EXPERIMENTAL

Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally device (active), intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure.

Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator

Extranasal Application

SHAM COMPARATOR

Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator device applied extranasally (control) for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure.

Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator

Interventions

The device delivers small electrical currents, activating nerves that stimulate the body's natural tear production system.

Extranasal ApplicationIntranasal Application

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Moderate to severe dry eye disease
  • Normal lid/lash anatomy, blinking function and closure as determined by the Investigator
  • Literate, able to speak English, and able to complete questionnaires independently

You may not qualify if:

  • Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to risk of clinically significant increased bleeding
  • Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma to these areas
  • Implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator
  • Corneal transplant in either or both eyes
  • A woman who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy at the Screening Visit
  • Be currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or have used an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Eye Care Institute

Louisville, Kentucky, 40206, United States

Location

Total Eye Care, PA

Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States

Location

Nashville Vision Associates

Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Intranasal and Extranasal data for this crossover study are combined because there is only access to combined arm data for this study. The study was acquired from another organization and limited results data are available.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area, Head
Organization
Allergan

Study Officials

  • Michelle Senchyna

    Allergan

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2016

First Posted

September 22, 2016

Study Start

September 30, 2016

Primary Completion

October 31, 2016

Study Completion

October 31, 2016

Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Results First Posted

January 31, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations