Multicenter Trial Evaluating Quality of Tears Produced by Nasal Neurostimulation
Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Multicenter Trial Comparing Quality of Tears Produced by Nasal Neurostimulation Versus Sham for Dry Eye
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are:
- To compare the change in levels of tear proteins and inflammatory mediators pre and post administration between the intranasal and extranasal applications
- To compare the goblet cell count following application between the intranasal and extranasal applications
- To compare fluorescein tear clearance with the application of the device intranasally and extranasally applications
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 31, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2021
CompletedOctober 19, 2021
September 1, 2021
10 months
March 2, 2015
September 22, 2021
September 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fluorescein Tear Clearance With Application
Day 1
Other Outcomes (3)
Level of Tear Proteins Pre and Post Administration
Day 1
Level of Inflammatory Mediators Pre and Post Administration
Day 1
Goblet Cell Count Following Application
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal then Extranasal Application
EXPERIMENTALIntranasal application of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator followed by extranasal application of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator.
Extranasal then Intranasal Application
ACTIVE COMPARATORExtranasal application of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator followed by Intranasal application of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator.
Interventions
The Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator applies a small electrical current to gently activate the body's natural tear production system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral dry eyes
- Capable of providing written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic or recurring epistaxis (nosebleeds)
- Blood coagulation disorder
- Uncontrolled or poorly controlled diabetes
- Heart or pulmonary disease
- Females who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy or nursing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oculeve, Inc.lead
Study Sites (2)
Grutzmacher, Lewis & Sierra
Sacramento, California, 95815, United States
Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gumus K, Schuetzle KL, Pflugfelder SC. Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing the Impact of Sham or Intranasal Tear Neurostimulation on Conjunctival Goblet Cell Degranulation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;177:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
PMID: 28302532DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
During transfer and acquisition of study record by sponsors, no study data has been located and all efforts to locate study data have been exhausted. Therefore, no study data is available to report at this time.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area, Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Lewis, MD
Grutzmacher, Lewis & Sierra
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2015
First Posted
March 11, 2015
Study Start
May 31, 2015
Primary Completion
March 31, 2016
Study Completion
March 31, 2016
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Results First Posted
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09