NCT02313454

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) in treating the symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 17, 2014

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 8, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 8, 2015

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2014

Results QC Date

November 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

dry eye syndromekeratoconjunctivitisophthalmiceye diseasecorneal diseasekeratitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score

    The participant graded their eye discomfort prior to CAE entry, during CAE exposure to threshold, then starting 1 minute after treatment application every 5 minutes in each eye separately using the Ora Calibra ODS where: 0=no discomfort to 4=constant discomfort. Data from the analysis eye was used to determine effectiveness. The analysis eye was defined as the first eye that reached the threshold and resulted in the device application. If both eyes reached the threshold at the same time point, the analysis eye was the eye with the lowest baseline Schirmer test score (a test to determine if the eye produces enough tears to keep it moist; \>10 mm is normal) or, if the Schirmer test scores were equal, the right eye. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Dry Eye Symptoms (DES) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Intranasal Application

EXPERIMENTAL

Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator device, intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) ≥3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE exposure.

Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator

Extranasal Application

SHAM COMPARATOR

Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator device, extranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE exposure.

Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator

Interventions

Neurostimulation applied intranasally and extranasally.

Extranasal ApplicationIntranasal Application

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Bilateral dry eyes
  • Capable of providing written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Chronic or recurring epistaxis (nosebleeds)
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Blood coagulation disorder
  • Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Andover Eye Associates

Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye SyndromesKeratoconjunctivitisEye DiseasesCorneal DiseasesKeratitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesConjunctivitisConjunctival Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
Allergan

Study Officials

  • Michelle Senchyna

    Allergan

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2014

First Posted

December 10, 2014

Study Start

November 17, 2014

Primary Completion

April 8, 2015

Study Completion

April 8, 2015

Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Results First Posted

January 31, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations