Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator in Patients With Dry Eye
A Single Center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Masked, Cross-Over Clinical Pilot Study to Evaluate the Reduction in the Exacerbation of the Symptoms of Dry Eye Upon Exposure to a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAESM) With Treatment by the Oculeve Nasal Lacrimal TENS Unit
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) in treating the symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 8, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 31, 2020
CompletedJanuary 31, 2020
January 1, 2020
5 months
December 8, 2014
November 27, 2019
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score
The participant graded their eye discomfort prior to CAE entry, during CAE exposure to threshold, then starting 1 minute after treatment application every 5 minutes in each eye separately using the Ora Calibra ODS where: 0=no discomfort to 4=constant discomfort. Data from the analysis eye was used to determine effectiveness. The analysis eye was defined as the first eye that reached the threshold and resulted in the device application. If both eyes reached the threshold at the same time point, the analysis eye was the eye with the lowest baseline Schirmer test score (a test to determine if the eye produces enough tears to keep it moist; \>10 mm is normal) or, if the Schirmer test scores were equal, the right eye. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Dry Eye Symptoms (DES) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal Application
EXPERIMENTALIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator device, intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) ≥3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE exposure.
Extranasal Application
SHAM COMPARATORIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator device, extranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE exposure.
Interventions
Neurostimulation applied intranasally and extranasally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral dry eyes
- Capable of providing written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic or recurring epistaxis (nosebleeds)
- Uncontrolled systemic disease
- Blood coagulation disorder
- Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Andover Eye Associates
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michelle Senchyna
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2014
First Posted
December 10, 2014
Study Start
November 17, 2014
Primary Completion
April 8, 2015
Study Completion
April 8, 2015
Last Updated
January 31, 2020
Results First Posted
January 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share