Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Back Pain- Pilot Sudy
BPS
Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic pain is a severe disabling problem within society, affecting 25-30% of the United States population.. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has the potential to provide a treatment option that is safe, scientifically-supported, low-cost, and easy-to-administer method to effectively reduce symptoms in patients suffering from chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of using tACS to treat patients with chronic pain, and to collect pilot efficacy as well as EEG and EKG biomarker data for optimizing the design of subsequent large-scale studies. The treatment rationale is to renormalize the presumed pathological structure of alpha oscillations in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of patients with chronic pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 12, 2018
CompletedDecember 12, 2018
January 1, 2018
4 months
August 3, 2017
October 19, 2018
November 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Heart Rate Variability Before and After 40-minute Stimulation
Changes in parasympathetic tone, increase in high frequency band input via spectral analysis on EKG recordings between active and sham stimulation
before and after 40-minute stimulation at each session
Change in Electroencephalogram Power in Alpha Band Before and After 40-minute Stimulation
Changes in the EEG power in the alpha (8-12 Hz) band before and after 40-minute stimulation
5 minute recordings before and after each 40-minute stimulation at each session.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale Before and After 40-minute Stimulation
before and after 40 minute stimulation session
Study Arms (2)
Sham tACS
SHAM COMPARATORSham Stimulation mimics the physical effects of stimulation, with up to one minute of stimulation during the session. Sham stimulation is delivered using the XCSITE100 Stimulator Sham.
Active 10 Hz tACS
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive 2mA of alternating current stimulation at a frequency of 10Hz for 40 minutes. tACS stimulation is delivered using the XCSITE100 Stimulator tACS.
Interventions
The participant will receive up to one minute of tACS stimulation until the stimulation fades. Sham stimulation mimics the skin sensations a participant would experience during a tACS session
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a method of noninvasive brain stimulation in which weak electrical current are applied to the scalp in a sine wave pattern to induce cortical oscillations at the frequency at which they are applied
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, aged 18-65
- Diagnosed with nonspecific chronic low back pain by clinician
- BMI is less than 30
- Suffered from chronic pain for \> 6 months
- Self-report pain measures \>4
- Meets criteria for low depression and suicide risk as defined by the Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale
- Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)
- Not currently taking opioids, benzodiazepines, and anticonvulsant medications
You may not qualify if:
- Radicular Pain
- Traumatic brain injury, Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips
- History of major neurological or psychiatric illness, including epilepsy
- (For females) Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Diagnosis of eating disorder (current or within the past 6 months), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (lifetime), or Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (currently under treatment)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Related Publications (2)
Prim JH, Ahn S, Davila MI, Alexander ML, McCulloch KL, Frohlich F. Targeting the Autonomic Nervous System Balance in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 11;12:3265-3277. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S208030. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31849514DERIVEDAhn S, Prim JH, Alexander ML, McCulloch KL, Frohlich F. Identifying and Engaging Neuronal Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain. 2019 Mar;20(3):277.e1-277.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
PMID: 30268803DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study include small sample size. Participants received only 1 session of Active 10 Hz tACS by design but there is likely an additive effect and future studies should investigate multiple sessions.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julianna Prim
- Organization
- UNC Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen McCulloch, PhD, DPT
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double-blind study, meaning that neither the participant nor the experimenter knows what kind of stimulation the participant is receiving. An unblinded monitor (separate from the staff that interacts with the participant) is responsible for creating the stimulation codes that run each session and for ensuring that these codes worked correctly.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2017
First Posted
August 8, 2017
Study Start
September 7, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
January 10, 2018
Last Updated
December 12, 2018
Results First Posted
December 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01