Single Session Pain Psychology Treatment: Comparative Efficacy & Mechanisms
"Empowered Relief" Single Session Pain Psychology Treatment: Comparative Efficacy & Mechanisms
1 other identifier
interventional
263
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy of a single session psychological treatment, "Empowered Relief" (ER), with the current standard of care, group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) specifically on individuals with chronic low back pain who have pain-specific distress as indexed by pain catastrophizing scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 18, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2020
October 1, 2020
3 years
May 22, 2017
October 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trait Pain Catastrophizing (Trait PC)
Change in Trait Pain Catastrophizing (Trait PC) from baseline to 3 months post-treatment across all treatment groups
3 months Post-Treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Trait PC at 6 months Post-treatment
6 months Post-Treatment
PROMIS Measures at 3 months Post-treatment
3 months Post-Treatment
Actigraphy for function and sleep
Several time frames from baseline to 3 months Post-Treatment
Study Arms (3)
Single Session Skills-Based Pain Psychology Class
EXPERIMENTAL"Empowered Relief (ER)": A single-session skills-based approximately 2-hr group intervention for chronic pain.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8-week Manualized Pain-CBT Group Intervention will be delivered by PhD-level psychotherapists (3 in total).
Health Education (HE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active control treatment arm consists only of Health Education and has no psychological treatment components. It is a 2-hour HE class matched to the single-session psychological experimental arm (ER) on 4 important factors: duration, structure, format and site.
Interventions
"Empowered Relief (ER)": A single-session skills-based approximately 2-hr group intervention to treat chronic pain. Format of intervention: Therapist-delivered PowerPoint presentation with experiential exercises. Experienced senior level psychologist and two (2) additional doctoral level psychologists will conduct the ER sessions. Content of intervention: ER Participants have the 'ER Relaxation Resource' app (guided relaxation audiofile) loaded on their apple or android electronic device.
Format of intervention: 8-week Manualized Pain-CBT Group Intervention will be delivered by PhD-level psychotherapists (3 in total). The group is run weekly for 8 consecutive classes. Each class is 2 hours with a midpoint break (16 hours total intervention time). Content of intervention: The protocol and materials were developed with funding from NIH/NCCAM R01 AT006226 (Dan Cherkin, PI) \[1\& 2\], and include content from a pain-CBT program developed by Drs. Ehde, Dillworth, and Turner \[3\]. Participants receive a workbook with homework and a copy of The Pain Survival Guide: How to reclaim your life © 2005 by Turk \& Winter \[4\] for optional reading.
Format of intervention: The HE class will be instructor taught and will involve a PowerPoint presentation and handouts. Two additional providers will be identified and trained to conduct the sessions. Selected instructors will have substantial health education experience. Content of intervention: HE content will include basic information such as nutrition and interacting with the healthcare system; these relatively 'inert' topics are unlikely to impart any specific effects typically found with a true psychobehavioral intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Axial low back pain without radicular symptoms
- Pain duration ≥ 6 months (per recent NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain based on participant self-report
- Average pain intensity ≥4/10 for the past month at screening visit
- English fluency
- Males and females 18-70 years of age
- Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) ≥20
You may not qualify if:
- Gross cognitive impairment
- Active suicidal ideation or severe depression
- Previous attendance in the active treatment groups (any ER classes ever taken or CBT in the past 3 years)
- Participating in any interventional research study or completed participation in the last 2 months; enrollment in an observational study is acceptable
- Current substance abuse
- Clear likelihood to disrupt fellow class participants (e.g., personality disorder) at the discretion of the study team
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (6)
1. Stoelb, B., Balderson, B., Turner, J.A., Mind-Body Approaches to Pain Management (MAP) Study: CBT Therapist Manual. 2012, Seattle, WA: Group Health Research Institute. (Developed with funding from NIH/NCCAM R01 AT006226; Dan Cherkin, PhD, Principal investigator).
BACKGROUND2. Stoelb, B., Balderson, B., Turner, J.A., Mind-Body Approaches to Pain Management (MAP) Study: CBT Patient Workbook. 2012, Seattle, WA: Group Health Research Institute (Developed with funding from NIH/NCCAM R01 AT006226; Dan Cherkin, PhD, Principal Investigator).
BACKGROUND3. Ehde, D.M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J.A. , Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Manual for the Telephone-Delivered Intervention for Pain Study (Unpublished treatment manual). 2012.
BACKGROUND4. Turk, D.C., Winter, F., The Pain Survival Guide: How to reclaim your life. 2005, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
BACKGROUNDDarnall BD, Roy A, Chen AL, Ziadni MS, Keane RT, You DS, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Mackey I, Kao MC, Cook KF, Lorig K, Zhang D, Hong J, Tian L, Mackey SC. Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2113401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401. Erratum In: JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e229739. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9739.
PMID: 34398206DERIVEDDarnall BD, Ziadni MS, Roy A, Kao MC, Sturgeon JA, Cook KF, Lorig K, Burns JW, Mackey SC. Comparative Efficacy and Mechanisms of a Single-Session Pain Psychology Class in Chronic Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 6;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2537-3.
PMID: 29510735DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beth Darnall, PhD
Stanford University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Mackey, MD, PhD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Principal Investigators and Statisticians performing analyses will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2017
First Posted
May 25, 2017
Study Start
June 8, 2017
Primary Completion
June 25, 2020
Study Completion
August 18, 2020
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share