Flow veRsus OxygeNaTion In acutE ReSpiratory Failure
Frontiers
A Dose Finding Study to Determine the Optimal Flow Rate and Oxygen Concentration Using High Flow Nasal Oxygenation for Patients With Respiratory Failure.
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High flow nasal oxygen therapy has been widely used but guidelines as to the optimal starting flow rate and oxygen percentage are not available. Prolonged exposure to an inappropriately high oxygen concentration should be avoided as there is increasing evidence that the production of oxygen free radicals can lead to lung damage. This pilot dose finding study will determine the optimal flow rate and oxygen concentration using HFNO2 for patients with respiratory failure requiring low, medium or high oxygen concentration from conventional low flow devices. An assessment will also be made of comfort and compliance with HFNO2.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 21, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.2 years
April 7, 2017
July 17, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Median FiO2 (%) needed to be delivered via high flow therapy (Optiflow), at 3 different flow rates, to maintain an oxygen saturation ≥94 % and respiratory rate ≤30 in 3 groups of patients with acute respiratory failure
The median fraction inspired concentration ( FiO2) required to maintain an oxygen saturation ≥94 % and respiratory rate ≤30 in patients with respiratory failure using 'Optiflow' device at three different oxygen flow rates 30 litres 45 litres and 60 litres per minute flow within the three stratified groups of low, median and high oxygen requirements (at recruitment to the study).
75 minutes after start of study
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction scores
75 minutes after start of study
Number of patients unable to tolerate 'Optiflow' device
0 to 75 minutes after start of study
Study Arms (3)
30 litres per minute
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
45 litres per minute
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
60 litres per minute
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
Interventions
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 18-80 at time of recruitment to study) Able to give their own consent (4 "A" Test score of 0 if capacity questionable) Acute respiratory failure but no significant deterioration in the previous hour Receiving conventional oxygen therapy (Hudson, Venturi, non-rebreathing mask or equivalent) up to a maximum of 90% Oxygen saturation ≥ 94% and respiratory rate ≤30
You may not qualify if:
- Type II respiratory failure (chloride ≤95 and bicarbonate ≥35, on an arterial blood gas or venous sample within 4 weeks) Chronic respiratory disease limiting functional capacity (MRC breathlessness grade IV or V) Pregnancy Heart failure (NYHA Grade III or IV) Decreased GCS Cardiovascular instability (systolic BP ≤90 or heart rate ≥130) Pulmonary embolism Unable to give informed consent Contraindication to receiving high flow nasal oxygen
- Nasal obstruction
- Previous bleomycin administration
- Base of skull fracture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clydelead
- Fisher and Paykel Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18540928BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2017
First Posted
July 21, 2017
Study Start
May 10, 2017
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data not relevant to individual patient after episode of respiratory failure