NCT03223948

Brief Summary

High flow nasal oxygen therapy has been widely used but guidelines as to the optimal starting flow rate and oxygen percentage are not available. Prolonged exposure to an inappropriately high oxygen concentration should be avoided as there is increasing evidence that the production of oxygen free radicals can lead to lung damage. This pilot dose finding study will determine the optimal flow rate and oxygen concentration using HFNO2 for patients with respiratory failure requiring low, medium or high oxygen concentration from conventional low flow devices. An assessment will also be made of comfort and compliance with HFNO2.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Median FiO2 (%) needed to be delivered via high flow therapy (Optiflow), at 3 different flow rates, to maintain an oxygen saturation ≥94 % and respiratory rate ≤30 in 3 groups of patients with acute respiratory failure

    The median fraction inspired concentration ( FiO2) required to maintain an oxygen saturation ≥94 % and respiratory rate ≤30 in patients with respiratory failure using 'Optiflow' device at three different oxygen flow rates 30 litres 45 litres and 60 litres per minute flow within the three stratified groups of low, median and high oxygen requirements (at recruitment to the study).

    75 minutes after start of study

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient satisfaction scores

    75 minutes after start of study

  • Number of patients unable to tolerate 'Optiflow' device

    0 to 75 minutes after start of study

Study Arms (3)

30 litres per minute

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Device: 'Optiflow'

45 litres per minute

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Device: 'Optiflow'

60 litres per minute

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Device: 'Optiflow'

Interventions

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

30 litres per minute45 litres per minute60 litres per minute

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient aged 18-80 at time of recruitment to study) Able to give their own consent (4 "A" Test score of 0 if capacity questionable) Acute respiratory failure but no significant deterioration in the previous hour Receiving conventional oxygen therapy (Hudson, Venturi, non-rebreathing mask or equivalent) up to a maximum of 90% Oxygen saturation ≥ 94% and respiratory rate ≤30

You may not qualify if:

  • Type II respiratory failure (chloride ≤95 and bicarbonate ≥35, on an arterial blood gas or venous sample within 4 weeks) Chronic respiratory disease limiting functional capacity (MRC breathlessness grade IV or V) Pregnancy Heart failure (NYHA Grade III or IV) Decreased GCS Cardiovascular instability (systolic BP ≤90 or heart rate ≥130) Pulmonary embolism Unable to give informed consent Contraindication to receiving high flow nasal oxygen
  • Nasal obstruction
  • Previous bleomycin administration
  • Base of skull fracture

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

Glasgow, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

    PMID: 18540928BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB

    NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Malcolm J watson, PhD, MB ChB

CONTACT

Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The patients recruited will be divided into 3 groups according to their oxygen (O2) requirements at recruitment (low, medium and high). All recruited patients will then be given supplementary O2 using the Optiflow system. Patients from all three recruitment oxygen requirements (low, medium and high) will be randomised to 30 litres, 45 litres or 60 litres per minute with initial a fractional inspired O2 concentration(FiO2) of 0.90 (90% oxygen). The FiO2 is then decreased in 0.05 increments every 5 minutes and the minimum oxygen saturation recorded until it reaches 94%.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2017

First Posted

July 21, 2017

Study Start

May 10, 2017

Primary Completion

August 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data not relevant to individual patient after episode of respiratory failure

Locations