NCT03537937

Brief Summary

Mechanical ventilation of ICU patients universally involves titration of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to maintain arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). Despite decades of ICU practice, however, the optimal SpO2 target remains unknown. Current guidelines offer divergent recommendations as to the optimal SpO2 target. Therefore, we propose a 2,250-patient cluster-randomized cluster-crossover trial comparing a lower SpO2 target (90%; range 88-92%), an intermediate SpO2 target (94%; range 92-96%), and a higher SpO2 target (98%; range 96-100%) with regard to the outcome of days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,541

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2022

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 25, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2018

Results QC Date

November 11, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ventilator-free Days (VFDs) to Study Day 28

    Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation between the final liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation before 28 days and study day 28. Patients who continue to receive invasive mechanical ventilation at day 28 or have died prior to day 28 will receive zero VFDs. For patients who return to invasive mechanical ventilation and are subsequently liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation prior to day 28, VFDs will be counted from final liberation from mechanical ventilation.

    28 days

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • 28-day, In-hospital Mortality (Secondary Outcome)

    28 days

  • Intensive Care Unit Mortality (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

    28 days

  • Vasopressor-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

    28 days

  • Renal Replacement Therapy-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

    28 days

  • Intensive Care Unit-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

    28 days

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Atrial Arrhythmia (Exploratory Safety Outcome)

    28 days

  • Ventricular Arrhythmia (Exploratory Safety Outcome)

    28 days

  • Cardiac Arrest (Exploratory Safety Outcome)

    28 days

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Lower SpO2 Target

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 90% (range 88-92%).

Other: Lower SpO2 Target

Intermediate SpO2 Target

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 94% (range 92-96%).

Other: Intermediate SpO2 Target

Higher SpO2 Target

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 98% (range 96-100%).

Other: Higher SpO2 Target

Interventions

SpO2 target 90% (range 88-92%)

Lower SpO2 Target

SpO2 target 94% (range 92-96%)

Intermediate SpO2 Target

SpO2 target 98% (range 96-100%)

Higher SpO2 Target

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Receiving mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy
  • Admitted to the study ICU or admission to the study ICU from the emergency department is planned

You may not qualify if:

  • Known pregnancy or beta hCG level greater than the laboratory upper limit of normal in a patient capable of becoming pregnant
  • Known to be a prisoner

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Shapiro JC, Casey JD, Qian ET, Seitz KP, Wang L, Lloyd BD, Stollings JL, Freundlich RE, Self WH, Rice TW, Wanderer JP, Semler MW; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Oxygen Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial. J Intensive Care Med. 2025 May;40(5):486-494. doi: 10.1177/08850666241299378. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

  • Semler MW, Casey JD, Lloyd BD, Hastings PG, Hays MA, Stollings JL, Buell KG, Brems JH, Qian ET, Seitz KP, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Freundlich RE, Wanderer JP, Han JH, Bernard GR, Self WH, Rice TW; PILOT Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Oxygen-Saturation Targets for Critically Ill Adults Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 10;387(19):1759-1769. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208415. Epub 2022 Oct 24.

  • Semler MW, Casey JD, Lloyd BD, Hastings PG, Hays M, Roth M, Stollings J, Brems J, Buell KG, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Freundlich RE, Wanderer JP, Bernard GR, Self WH, Rice TW; PILOT Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets (PILOT) clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 28;11(10):e052013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052013.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chair of the Steering Committee
Organization
Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group

Study Officials

  • Matthew W Semler, MD

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Observer bias will be minimized by use of objective endpoints collected in duplicate by \[1\] study personnel blinded to group assignment and \[2\] automated data extraction from the electronic health record.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In the PILOT trial, the entire study ICU will be assigned to a single SpO2 target (cluster-randomized) and the ICU will switch between lower, intermediate, and higher SpO2 targets every two months in a randomly generated sequence (cluster-crossover).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Posted

May 25, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

January 31, 2022

Study Completion

January 31, 2022

Last Updated

September 25, 2023

Results First Posted

September 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The NIH's guidelines for data sharing will serve as the model for the approach we will follow for the proposed investigation; http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data\_sharing/data\_sharing\_guidance.htm Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, the inherent link between the period in which the patient was admitted to the study ICU and group assignment in a cluster-crossover trial introduces a significant risk for deductive disclosure of subjects. Thus, we will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations