Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial
PILOT
1 other identifier
interventional
2,541
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanical ventilation of ICU patients universally involves titration of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to maintain arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). Despite decades of ICU practice, however, the optimal SpO2 target remains unknown. Current guidelines offer divergent recommendations as to the optimal SpO2 target. Therefore, we propose a 2,250-patient cluster-randomized cluster-crossover trial comparing a lower SpO2 target (90%; range 88-92%), an intermediate SpO2 target (94%; range 92-96%), and a higher SpO2 target (98%; range 96-100%) with regard to the outcome of days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2023
CompletedSeptember 25, 2023
November 1, 2022
3.6 years
May 15, 2018
November 11, 2022
November 11, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ventilator-free Days (VFDs) to Study Day 28
Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation between the final liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation before 28 days and study day 28. Patients who continue to receive invasive mechanical ventilation at day 28 or have died prior to day 28 will receive zero VFDs. For patients who return to invasive mechanical ventilation and are subsequently liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation prior to day 28, VFDs will be counted from final liberation from mechanical ventilation.
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
28-day, In-hospital Mortality (Secondary Outcome)
28 days
Intensive Care Unit Mortality (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
28 days
Vasopressor-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
28 days
Renal Replacement Therapy-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
28 days
Intensive Care Unit-free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
28 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Atrial Arrhythmia (Exploratory Safety Outcome)
28 days
Ventricular Arrhythmia (Exploratory Safety Outcome)
28 days
Cardiac Arrest (Exploratory Safety Outcome)
28 days
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Lower SpO2 Target
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 90% (range 88-92%).
Intermediate SpO2 Target
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 94% (range 92-96%).
Higher SpO2 Target
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring invasive mechanical ventilation in a study location, the fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to target an arterial oxygen saturation of 98% (range 96-100%).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Receiving mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy
- Admitted to the study ICU or admission to the study ICU from the emergency department is planned
You may not qualify if:
- Known pregnancy or beta hCG level greater than the laboratory upper limit of normal in a patient capable of becoming pregnant
- Known to be a prisoner
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Related Publications (3)
Shapiro JC, Casey JD, Qian ET, Seitz KP, Wang L, Lloyd BD, Stollings JL, Freundlich RE, Self WH, Rice TW, Wanderer JP, Semler MW; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Oxygen Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial. J Intensive Care Med. 2025 May;40(5):486-494. doi: 10.1177/08850666241299378. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
PMID: 39784122DERIVEDSemler MW, Casey JD, Lloyd BD, Hastings PG, Hays MA, Stollings JL, Buell KG, Brems JH, Qian ET, Seitz KP, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Freundlich RE, Wanderer JP, Han JH, Bernard GR, Self WH, Rice TW; PILOT Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Oxygen-Saturation Targets for Critically Ill Adults Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 10;387(19):1759-1769. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208415. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
PMID: 36278971DERIVEDSemler MW, Casey JD, Lloyd BD, Hastings PG, Hays M, Roth M, Stollings J, Brems J, Buell KG, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Freundlich RE, Wanderer JP, Bernard GR, Self WH, Rice TW; PILOT Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets (PILOT) clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 28;11(10):e052013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052013.
PMID: 34711597DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chair of the Steering Committee
- Organization
- Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew W Semler, MD
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Observer bias will be minimized by use of objective endpoints collected in duplicate by \[1\] study personnel blinded to group assignment and \[2\] automated data extraction from the electronic health record.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2018
First Posted
May 25, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
January 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 25, 2023
Results First Posted
September 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
The NIH's guidelines for data sharing will serve as the model for the approach we will follow for the proposed investigation; http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data\_sharing/data\_sharing\_guidance.htm Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, the inherent link between the period in which the patient was admitted to the study ICU and group assignment in a cluster-crossover trial introduces a significant risk for deductive disclosure of subjects. Thus, we will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.