The Efficacy of the Whisperflow CPAP System Versus Nasal High Flow in Patients at High Risk for Postextubation Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patient who are at risk for postextubation failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
September 1, 2016
9 months
August 16, 2016
September 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reintubation rate
Number of participants who required reintubation within 48 hours after extubation
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
post extubation respiratory failure
48 hours
Other Outcomes (3)
Length of ICU stay
30 days
Patient's discomfort
48 hours
oxygen desaturations
48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Continuous positive airway pressure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter extubation, patients will receive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System (control) Intervention:Device : CPAP of 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System for 48 hours
Nasal high-flow
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter extubation, patients will receive oxygen therapy through the nasal high-flow (intervention) Intervention: Device: Nasal high-flow
Interventions
After extubation, the patients will receive oxygen delivered through the nasal high-flow system (Optiflow™). The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients. Gas flow will be set until maximal level of 60 LPM.
After extubation, patients will receive CPAP at 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System. The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours and
- high risk for extubation failure namely , congestive heart failure, ineffective cough and excessive tracheobronchial secretions, more than one failure of a weaning trial, more than one co-morbid condition, patients who had hypercapnia, and upper airway obstruction without immediately required intubation
You may not qualify if:
- age\<18 years
- pregnancy
- tracheostomy
- uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias
- unstable hemodynamic status
- documented swallowing problem
- documented cervical spine injury
- Facial anatomical abnormalities interfering with the mask fit
- agitated or uncooperative state
- lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ramathibodi Hospital
Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
Related Publications (5)
Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
PMID: 25003980BACKGROUNDNava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F, Squadrone E, Grassi M, Carlucci A, Beltrame F, Navalesi P. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2465-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000186416.44752.72.
PMID: 16276167BACKGROUNDGlover GW, Fletcher SJ. Assessing the performance of the Whisperflow continuous positive airway pressure generator: a bench study. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):875-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep077. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
PMID: 19380311BACKGROUNDCoplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld GD. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1530-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9905102.
PMID: 10806150BACKGROUNDNava S, Hill N. Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):250-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60496-7.
PMID: 19616722BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2016
First Posted
September 29, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09