COMparison Between All immunoTherapies for Multiple Sclerosis.
COMBAT-MS
1 other identifier
observational
3,526
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overarching goal of this study is to determine whether rituximab (RTX) offers effectiveness and safety advantages over other commonly used approved Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMT) in the largest real-world population-based structured prospective follow-up cohort of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients. The study will include both treatment naïve patients starting their first DMT and patients switching from a previous first line DMT (escalation/second-line).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2025
CompletedApril 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.8 years
April 20, 2017
September 11, 2023
March 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Confirmed Disease Progression in Patients With Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) <2.5 at Baseline
Proportion of patients with baseline EDSS \<2.5 progressing to 12 months confirmed EDSS ≥3 among those over 3 years of follow up. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scale range: Minimum score: 0 (normal neurological examination). Maximum score: 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) Lower scores indicate better outcomes (less disability). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more disability).
3 years
Confirmed Disease Progression in Patients With EDSS ≥2.5 at Baseline
\- Proportion of patients with baseline EDSS ≥2.5 experiencing 12 months confirmed EDSS increase of 1 point among those over 3 years of follow up Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scale range: Minimum score: 0 (normal neurological examination). Maximum score: 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) Lower scores indicate better outcomes (less disability). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more disability).
3 years
Disease-related Impact on Daily Life, Physical
\- Change in the MSIS-29 physical subscale (change from baseline; mean value) The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) physical subscale measures patient-reported physical impact of multiple sclerosis. Scale range: Minimum score: 1 (least impact). Maximum score: 5 (highest impact). Lower scores indicate better outcomes. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
3 years
Disease-related Impact on Daily Life, Psychological
\- Change in the MSIS-29 psychological subscale (change from baseline; mean value) The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) psychological subscale measures patient-reported psychological impact of multiple sclerosis. Scale range: Minimum score: 1 (least impact). Maximum score: 5 (highest impact). Lower scores indicate better outcomes. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Annualized Relapse Rate
3 years
Remaining on Drug
3 years
Increase in EDSS
3 years
Proportion of Patients With at Least 1 Step Increase in EDSS
3 years
Proportion of Patients With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) -2
3 years
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Comparisons of efficacy and safety between rituximab and all other frequently used immunomodulating drugs against multiple sclerosis
Eligibility Criteria
All patients initiated at their first or second disease-modifying drug between January 1 2011 and June 30 2018 will be included in the trial. Up to present date, study-related data will be retrospectively controlled via individual study of patient records. Patients will be identified through the Swedish MS registry. Inclusion into the COMBAT-MS core study will be subject to written informed consent. Given the non-intervention design of the study and very limited study-specific procedures outside of clinical practise, we expect participation rates to be very high. Based on preliminary calculations from the MS registry the projected number of participants will be 3700 patients, out of which at least 1000 are treated with rituximab first or second-line.
You may qualify if:
- The study population consists of all patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS) or RRMS who;
- Initiate a first MS DMT (treatment naïve), or Initiate a second ever DMT, of a different drug class than the first, regardless of time between drugs or reason for discontinuation("switchers") from 1st Jan 2011 to 30st June 2018, and
- Are followed at any of the University clinics of Sweden, and
- Consent to participation in COMBAT-MS core, and
- Are expected to be capable to follow study assessments.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patients with progressive forms of MS at start of therapy are not eligible
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Fredrik Piehl
Stockholm, Sweden
Biospecimen
Serum samples will be taken yearly for analysis of anti-drug antibodies. These samples will be saved in biobank. Additional blood samples will be taken for analyses of SARS-CoV-2 serologic response.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
COMBAT was an observational real-world study assessing the outcomes of different DMTs as used according to clinical practice. The assignment of treatments was not under investigator control, there was no randomization and no blinding of treatments. Although differences in patient characteristics at treatment start was accounted for by statistical modelling, the risk of residual confounding should be kept in mind.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Fredrik Piehl
- Organization
- Karolinska Institutet
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fredrik Piehl, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anders Svenningsson, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Fogdell-Hahn, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ingrid Kockum, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Frisell, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Annette Langer-Gould, MD, PhD
Kaiser Permanent Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 3 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2017
First Posted
June 21, 2017
Study Start
June 2, 2017
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2022
Last Updated
April 20, 2025
Results First Posted
April 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share