Comparison Between Optimal Coherence Tomography Guidance and Angiography Guidance in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
COCOA
1 other identifier
interventional
550
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aims to demonstrate the superiority of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with Angiography-guided PCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2021
CompletedOctober 8, 2019
October 1, 2019
3.2 years
June 1, 2017
October 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Minimum stent area
Minimum stent area is measured by OCT
Immediately after PCI
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Target vessel failure
12-month afte PCI
Study Arms (2)
OCT-guided PCI
ACTIVE COMPARATORPCI is performed by OCT guidance.
Angiography-guided PCI
ACTIVE COMPARATORPCI is performed by angiography guidance alone.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients eligible for PCI using drug-eluting stent (DES) to a de novo native coronary artery lesion in stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (evaluated based on the guideline)
- Aged 20 years or older at the time of their consent
- Patients who agree to be enrolled in the trial giving signed written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- \) Patients who have showed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in previous 3 months 2) Patients with cardiogenic shock 3) Patients with heart failure 4) Patients with 3-vessel disease 5) Patients scheduled to use bare metal stent 6) Patients with renal function disorder (eGFR 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or less or serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or more) 7) Patients undergoing hemodialysis 8) Patients with allergies to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, heparin, and iodinated contrast agents 9) Patients with hemorrhagic complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding 10) Patients scheduled to undergo surgical treatment after PCI within 1 year 11) Patients participating in the clinical study of other medical device or drug and who were considered affecting the primary endpoint of this study by the physician in charge 12) Patients with one or more co-morbidities that shorten life expectancy to less than 12 months or that may interfere with the study process according to this study protocol 13) Patients scheduled to use IVUS in PCI 14) Patients in whom the form of the target disease concerned is applicable to any of the following lesions: (i) Lesion in the previously (within 1 year) treated coronary artery or lesion in the coronary artery with the other lesions requiring revascularization with PCI in the near future (within 1 year) (ii) Lesion in the left main coronary artery (iii) Lesion in the coronary bypass graft (iv) Aorto-ostial lesion in right coronary artery (arising within 3 mm of the origin of a right coronary artery) (v) Lesion of chronic total occlusion (vi) Coronary bifurcation lesion requiring revascularization with 2 stents (vii) Coronary bypass graft lesion (viii) Lesion in coronary artery with diameter of \< 2.5mm or \>4.00mm (ix) Long lesion (length \>40mm) (x) Lesion in coronary artery where we expected difficulty in advancing the OCT catheter (e.g. extremely tortuous artery or severely calcified artery)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takashi Kubo, MDlead
- Daiichi Sankyocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University
Wakayama, 6418509, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Takashi Akaska, MD
Wakayama Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2017
First Posted
June 6, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10