Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-FFR Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve
Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Invasive coronary angiography is currently considered gold standard in the assessment of coronary artery disease although the method has limitations. Most importantly invasive angiography only depicts coronary anatomy without determining its physiological significance i.e the likelihood that the stenosis impedes oxygen delivery to the heart muscle. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a catheterization technique for assessing the physiological significance of a coronary artery lesion during invasive coronary angiography. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging test that has become an alternative route to diagnosis for patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Computational fluid dynamics combined with anatomical models based on CCTA scans allows determination of coronary flow and pressure, and has emerged as a promising diagnostic modality called CT-FFR. In this Project New Mathematical algorithms are developed for computation of CT-FFR. The main objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values obtained by the new method compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve and state-of-the-art dobutamin stress echocardiography.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 9, 2021
March 1, 2020
4 years
January 26, 2017
March 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
CT- FFR values by New Method as a dichotomous variable
Determining the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values obtained by the new method compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve
4 weeks
Worsening regional wall motion abnormality
Determining the diagnostic accuracy of invasive FFR with comprehensive stress echocardiographic techniques
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
CT-FFR
EXPERIMENTALAnalyse With New CT-FFR Method
Stress echocardiography
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnalyse With invasive FFR and stress echocardiography
Interventions
Stress echocardiography and invasive FFR
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Proven stenosis by CCTA that require further investigation with invasive coronary angiography i.e. patients with estimated stenosis ≥30- 50%.
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with unstable coronary artery disease.
- Previously treated with PCI or coronary surgery.
- Severe renal impairment i.e. GFR \<30ml / min
- Contrast allergy
- Contraindication to adenosine / nitroglycerin / beta-blocker
- BMI\> 40
- Patients referred on the basis of technically unsuccessful CTA, motion artifact or similar
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospitallead
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Olavs Hospital, Klinikk for hjertemedisin
Trondheim, Norway
Related Publications (2)
Braten AT, Fossan FE, Muller LO, Jorgensen A, Stensaeth KH, Hellevik LR, Wiseth R. Automated computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve model for diagnosing haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a prospective validation study. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Sep 30;2(3):qyae102. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae102. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PMID: 39450294DERIVEDTjellaug Braten A, Holte E, Wiseth R, Aakhus S. Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards. Open Heart. 2024 Sep 30;11(2):e002899. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002899.
PMID: 39349050DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Petter Aadahl, MD, PhD
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
February 21, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share