Effectiveness of Mirror Therapy in Patients With Amputations of Lower Limbs of Vascular Origin
MIR-PHAN
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the mirror therapy on phantom pain for patients with amputation after vascular etiology. the secondary aim are to measure the impact of the mirror therapy on quality of life, sleep disorders, and predictive factors for effectiveness. the design is a prospective study, randomised, blindly evaluated, monocentric. There will be 2 groups: 1) rehabilitation and gabapentine; 2) rehabilitation and gabapentine + mirror therapy during the first 4 weeks. The assessment are going to be preformed at the inclusion day and then every 2 weeks during 8 weeks. the primary evaluation criterion will be the phantom pain measured on a VAS. the delay for inclusion is 18 months in order ton include 40 patients. The length of the study is 20 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2019
CompletedDecember 3, 2019
May 1, 2019
2.5 years
February 3, 2017
November 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline of the phantom limb pain using a VAS
The EVA and the details of the analgesic treatment were collected every two weeks, blinded by an independent evaluator. Patients should not tell the evaluator which group they are assigned to.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline of the Frequency of phantom limb pain episodes
every 2 weeks from day inclusion to Week 8
change from baseline of the duration of phantom limb pain episodes.
every 2 weeks from day inclusion to Week 8
Change from baseline of the consumption of pharmacological analgesic drugs
every 2 weeks from day inclusion to Week 8
Quality of life? MEASUREMENT OF PAIN SENSATION
every 2 weeks from day inclusion to Week 8
Sleep disorders
every 2 weeks from day inclusion to Week 8
Study Arms (2)
Reference analgesic
ACTIVE COMPARATORGabapentin Rehabilitation Local care
reference analgesic and mirror therapy
EXPERIMENTALMirror Therapy Gabapentin Rehabilitation Local care
Interventions
by a mirror effect the patient sees his remaining arm at the place of the amputated arm that cause an illusion of presence of this arm to the brain and would have an effect of reducing phantom pain
titration of Gabapentin up to 3600 mg or maximum tolerated dose for 8 weeks
Daily care with physiotherapist ; orthoprosthetists , and specialized sports educators ; if necessary : occupational therapy.
local care for directed healing of the stump.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years of age who signed the memorandum.
- Patient hospitalized in the service for setting up equipment.
- In the aftermath of a major amputation of the lower limb, of vascular origin.
- Patients with phantom pain greater than or equal to 30 Visual Analog Evaluation (EVA); Whether pharmacologically or not.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study.
- Presence of cognitive or psychiatric disorders that compromise the realization of mirror therapy.
- Presence of neurological, rheumatological or orthopedic disorders that may prevent movement of the unaffected limb.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut Merle d'Aubigné
Valenton, 94460, France
Related Publications (1)
B Aledi L, Flumignan CD, Trevisani VF, Miranda F Jr. Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD013711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013711.pub2.
PMID: 37276273DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larlène Lacout, MD
APHP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assossor won't know if the participant has received the mirror therapy
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2017
First Posted
May 11, 2017
Study Start
February 22, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2019
Last Updated
December 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05