EmPOWERing Active Seniors With Energy
EASE
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A pilot study comparing the emPOWER Ankle System to standard carbon fiber prosthetic feet, in active seniors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 9, 2020
CompletedApril 24, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.5 years
November 2, 2016
January 17, 2020
April 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful change (improvement, no change, worsening) in the walking distance measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). 6minWT improvement was defined as a minimum increase of 45 meters.
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the Twelve Minute Walk Test (12MWT)
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the L-Test
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the Ramp Test
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, or Worsening in Performance in the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale Score
3 months with the emPOWER ankle
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Activity Diary
3 months
Study Arms (1)
emPOWER Ankle (powered prosthesis)
OTHERThe subject's own passive prosthesis will be used as a baseline and crossed over after the emPOWER has been worn 3-4 months. Then the passive foot will be crossed back to the emPOWER for a final series of tests.
Interventions
The device is 510k cleared and is intended to replace a missing foot and ankle. The emPOWER Ankle is to be used exclusively for fittings of lower-extremity amputations as prescribed by a healthcare professional.
Devices will vary. Data gathered will form a baseline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females
- years or older
- Subjects with transtibial amputations of either leg at least 1 year prior
- Suction or elevated vacuum suspension and Socket Comfort Score of at least 6
- Sock fluctuation of ≤ 8 ply per day
- K-level rating of 3 or 4 based on the Amputee Mobility Predictor Assessment Tool
- Ability to walk at a walking speed of \> 0.75 meters per second
- Unilateral amputees (up to 7 bilateral amputees can be included, 1 per site in addition to the unilateral amputees who will be analyzed as a separate sub group)
- Foot size: 25-30 cm
- Ability to complete a continuous 6-Minute Walk Test
- Ability to provide written, informed consent
- Ability to complete study visits and study documents
- Ability to manage the complexity of a powered device including charging and changing batteries as needed
- Ability to read and understand English
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have never used a prosthetic device
- Less than 55 years of age
- Weight \<150 lbs. or \> 287 lbs.
- Transfemoral amputees
- Active sores or ulceration on subject's residual limb
- Sore on contralateral foot.
- Cuff-link socket suspension
- Socket Comfort Score less than 6
- Sock fluctuation of \> 8 per day
- K level of 1 or 2
- Amputation clearance \< 8.625"
- History of stroke or TIA that impairs current walking
- Recent history of excessive falling defined as more than 2 falls requiring medical assistance in the prior year
- Medications potentially affecting balance
- Recent hospitalization (within past 3 months)
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UTHealth, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Russ Lundstrom
- Organization
- Ottobock Healthcare
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Danielle Melton, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2016
First Posted
November 8, 2016
Study Start
February 10, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2018
Study Completion
July 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Results First Posted
April 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share