Microprocessor Knees in Early Rehabilitation
Do Microprocessor Knees Improve Outcomes in Early Prosthetic Rehabilitation Compared to Nonmicroprocessor Knees?
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High-quality, empirical evidence to guide prosthetic rehabilitation following amputation ensures that Service members, Veterans, and civilians who experience limb loss have the potential to receive the highest quality care, regain mobility, return to gainful employment, and reintegrate into their communities. However, evidence to inform prosthetic care during the crucial post-amputation period is extremely limited. The proposed research will address this gap in knowledge by evaluating functional and patient-centered health outcomes associated with use of two distinct prosthetic knee technologies in early rehabilitation following transfemoral amputation. This novel, comparative effectiveness research aligns with the Prosthetic Outcomes Research Award (PORA) focus area of understanding the management of patient rehabilitation strategies throughout the rehabilitation process following neuromuscular injury. The long-term goals of this project are to optimize early rehabilitation processes and associated outcomes for Service members, Veterans, and civilians with lower limb amputation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential for different prosthetic knee technologies to promote function, health, and quality of life following amputation. A pilot randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare falls, step activity, balance confidence, mobility, health-related quality of life, and community integration of people with recent transfemoral amputation in two prosthetic knee conditions: a microprocessor knee (MPK) with control of stance phase and a non-microprocessor knee (NMPK) that is appropriate for people in early rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2020
CompletedSeptember 11, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.1 years
February 8, 2018
September 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility
Self-reported prosthetic mobility
Monthly for 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Fall frequency
Monthly for 3 months
Daily step count
Average daily step count by month for 3 months
Timed up and go
Monthly for 3 months
Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMPPro) Assessment Tool
Monthly for 3 months
Six-minute walk test
Monthly for 3 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Microprocessor Knee
EXPERIMENTALOttobock Kenevo/Ottobock C-Leg
Nonmicroprocessor knee
ACTIVE COMPARATOROttobock 3R60 for K3 participants, Ottobock 3R62 for K2 participants.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older, Unilateral transfemoral amputation, Between 4-16 weeks post amputation, Deemed ready for prosthetic fitting by a physician, No current or prior transfemoral prosthetic use, Able to read, write and communicate in English, Weight 125kg (275lbs) or less
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of health condition (i.e. advanced cardiac disease, severe or end-stage pulmonary disease or severe dementia) that prevents safe prosthesis use or community ambulation with prosthesis, Weight greater than 125kg (275lbs)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Washingtonlead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara J Morgan, PhD
University of Washington
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigators who will conduct performance-based assessments will be blinded to the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Acting Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2018
First Posted
February 14, 2018
Study Start
April 13, 2018
Primary Completion
May 15, 2020
Study Completion
May 15, 2020
Last Updated
September 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share