Somatotopic Configuration of Distal Residual Limb Tissues in Lower Extremity Amputations
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The hypothesis of this research protocol is that we will be able to redesign the manner in which lower limb amputations are performed so as to include biological actuators that will enable the successful employment of next generation lower extremity prostheses. The specific aims of the project are as follows:
- 1.To define a standardized approach to the performance of a novel operative procedure for both below knee (BKA) and above knee (AKA) amputations
- 2.To measure the degree of volitional motor activation and excursion achievable in the residual limb constructs, and to determine the optimal configuration and design of such constructs
- 3.To describe the extent of proprioceptive and other sensory feedback achievable through the employment of these modified surgical techniques
- 4.To validate the functional and somatosensory superiority of the proposed amputation technique over standard approaches to BKA and AKA
- 5.To develop a modified acute postoperative rehabilitation strategy suited to this new surgical approach
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 20, 2025
October 1, 2025
7 years
September 18, 2017
October 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Motor Unit Innervation
Intact volitional activation of motor constructs, as assessed by electromyographic evidence of activation (muscle potentials measured in mV)
0-48 months
Motor Unit Excursion
Intact volitional activation of motor constructs with measurable excursion, as assessed by ultrasound (excursion measured in mm)
0-48 months
Proprioception Recovery
Manifestation of functional proprioception with motor unit activation, as evidenced by spatial limb position testing using a modified lower limb prosthesis (accurate limb positioning relative to target measured in mm)
0-48 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Infection Rate
0-48 months
Delayed Wound Healing Rate
0-48 months
Operative Revision Rate
0-48 months
Seroma Rate
0-48 months
Deep Vein Thrombosis Rate
0-48 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALModified amputation procedure
Interventions
A stair-step (BKA) or fishmouth (AKA) incision will be made. Tibial and fibular or femoral osteotomies will be performed. Segments of the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and tibialis posterior (TP) muscles will be isolated, as well as the quadriceps (Q) and hamstring (H) groups in the AKA model; if it is not possible to preserve native innervation to these muscles, functional motor units will be constructed from muscle coapted to the appropriate motor nerve endings. The distal tibial and peroneal nerves will be redirected to skin patches in the distal or proximal thigh. Coaptation of the TA/LG, PL/TP and Q/H muscles will then be performed to promote dynamic coupling of these agonist/antagonist pairs. The skin envelope will then be closed in layers over percutaneous drains.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females between the ages of 18 and 65
- Candidates for elective unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation at either the above knee or below knee level due to traumatic injury, congenital limb deformities or progressive arthritis
- Must demonstrate sufficiently sound health to undergo the operative procedure, including adequate cardiopulmonary stability to undergo general anesthesia (specifically, American Society of Anesthesiology Class I or II)
- Must have intact inherent wound healing capacity
- Must demonstrate adequate communication skills to convey the status of their sensorimotor recovery throughout the postoperative phase,
- Must exhibit proper level of motivation to comply with postoperative follow up requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients beyond the stated age restrictions
- Those with severe illness rendering them unable to undergo the operative procedure safely (e.g., unresolved sepsis or cardiopulmonary instability manifest as documented coronary artery disease and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
- Patients with impairment in inherent wound healing pathways, such as those with primary connective tissue disorders or those on chronic steroid therapy
- Patients with extensive peripheral neuropathies (diabetic or otherwise) that would potentially inhibit appropriate reinnervation of the surgical constructs
- Active smokers; those patients willing to undergo tobacco cessation will need to be completely abstinent from tobacco use for at least 6 weeks preoperatively
- Patients who are unable to provide informed consent and those with a demonstrated history of poor compliance
- Pregnant women will not be considered due to the potential risks of general anesthesia.
- Patients will not be excluded from participation in the study on the grounds of minority status, religious status, race or gender. Non-English speaking patients will not be excluded from the study; interpreters will be made available to them for translation of both verbal interactions and written documents.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospitallead
- Massachusetts Institute of Technologycollaborator
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States
Related Publications (11)
Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
PMID: 18295618BACKGROUNDWaters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jan;58(1):42-6.
PMID: 1249111BACKGROUNDHerr HM, Grabowski AM. Bionic ankle-foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):457-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1194. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
PMID: 21752817BACKGROUNDSchultz AE, Kuiken TA. Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: the state of the art and future possibilities. PM R. 2011 Jan;3(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.016.
PMID: 21257135BACKGROUNDShih JJ, Krusienski DJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Mar;87(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
PMID: 22325364BACKGROUNDKung TA, Bueno RA, Alkhalefah GK, Langhals NB, Urbanchek MG, Cederna PS. Innovations in prosthetic interfaces for the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1515-1523. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a97e5f.
PMID: 24281580BACKGROUNDNavarro X, Krueger TB, Lago N, Micera S, Stieglitz T, Dario P. A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005 Sep;10(3):229-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x.
PMID: 16221284BACKGROUNDDumanian GA, Ko JH, O'Shaughnessy KD, Kim PS, Wilson CJ, Kuiken TA. Targeted reinnervation for transhumeral amputees: current surgical technique and update on results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):863-869. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b038c9.
PMID: 19730305BACKGROUNDKuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Englehart KB. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):619-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.116.
PMID: 19211469BACKGROUNDLi YG, Chen XJ, Zhang YZ, Han DZ, Yan DX, Gao GZ, Zhao XC, Sun WJ. Three-dimensional digitalized virtual planning for retrograde sural neurovascular island flaps: a comparative study. Burns. 2014 Aug;40(5):974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
PMID: 24290858BACKGROUNDSrinivasan SS, Gutierrez-Arango S, Teng AC, Israel E, Song H, Bailey ZK, Carty MJ, Freed LE, Herr HM. Neural interfacing architecture enables enhanced motor control and residual limb functionality postamputation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9):e2019555118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019555118.
PMID: 33593940DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew J Carty, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2017
First Posted
December 15, 2017
Study Start
September 15, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan for individual participant data sharing