NCT03119415

Brief Summary

Students' cooperative and prosocial behavior is vital to their social and academic success and to the quality of a school's social environment. This project will evaluate an instructional technique that could benefit students and schools by encouraging higher levels of prosocial behavior among students and promoting social integration and inclusion, particularly for marginalized students. The instructional technique is called "cooperative learning" which involves students working in groups toward shared academic goals. Previous research indicates that cooperative learning promotes social acceptance and increases academic engagement and achievement. However, it has not been evaluated as a technique to reduce student behavioral problems and promote greater school safety. There is strong reason to believe that it will have these benefits, since cooperative learning brings together students from diverse social groups and provides them the opportunity to work together toward shared goals in a positive setting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,064

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 23, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Substance use

    Tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana; actual use, intentions to use, willingness to use

    twice a year for two years during 7th and 8th grades

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    twice a year for two years during 7th and 8th grades

  • Engagement vs. Disaffection with Learning

    twice a year for two years during 7th and 8th grades

  • Classroom Life Scale

    twice a year for two years during 7th and 8th grades

  • University of Illinois Bully Scale

    twice a year for two years during 7th and 8th grades

Study Arms (2)

Cooperative Learning

EXPERIMENTAL

Teachers in intervention schools are training in cooperative learning (CL).

Behavioral: Cooperative Learning

Business as Usual

NO INTERVENTION

Schools continue with business as usual.

Interventions

CL is an umbrella term that includes peer tutoring, reciprocal teaching, collaborative reading, and other methods in which peers help each other learn in small groups. CL is not prescriptive but rather is a conceptual framework within which teachers design their own small-group activities. Johnson, Johnson, and Holubec's approach to CL combines positive interdependence with individual accountability, a high degree of face-to-face social interaction among youth, and support for the development of cooperative social skills. The Johnsons' approach offers teachers the combination of specific cooperative activities and the conceptual tools to create their own lesson plans using positive interdependence.

Cooperative Learning

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All students in participating schools in the 7th grade (first year) and 8th grade (second year)

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Research Insititute

Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. Enlisting Peer Cooperation in the Service of Alcohol Use Prevention in Middle School. Child Dev. 2018 Nov;89(6):e459-e467. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12981. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

    PMID: 29265358BACKGROUND
  • Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. Cooperative Learning in Middle School: A Means to Improve Peer Relations and Reduce Victimization, Bullying, and Related Outcomes. J Educ Psychol. 2018 Nov;110(8):1192-1201. doi: 10.1037/edu0000265. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

    PMID: 30911200BACKGROUND
  • Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. Peer influence processes as mediators of effects of a middle school substance use prevention program. Addict Behav. 2018 Oct;85:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

    PMID: 29921538BACKGROUND
  • Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. Effects of cooperative learning on peer relations, empathy, and bullying in middle school. Aggress Behav. 2019 Nov;45(6):643-651. doi: 10.1002/ab.21858. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

    PMID: 31432535BACKGROUND
  • Lee DC, O'Brien KM, McCrabb S, Wolfenden L, Tzelepis F, Barnes C, Yoong S, Bartlem KM, Hodder RK. Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco or alcohol use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub4.

  • Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. The Longitudinal Relationship Between Peer Relations and Empathy and their Joint Contribution to Reducing Bullying in Middle School: Findings from a Randomized Trial of Cooperative Learning. J Prev Health Promot. 2022 Apr;3(2):147-165. doi: 10.1177/26320770221094032. Epub 2022 May 5.

  • Low S, Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth CJ. Peer learning can modify the reciprocal relationship between peer support and victimization in middle school. J Adolesc. 2023 Apr;95(3):524-536. doi: 10.1002/jad.12133. Epub 2022 Dec 22.

  • Van Ryzin MJ, Cil G, Roseth CJ. Costs and benefits of cooperative learning as a universal school-based approach to adolescent substance use prevention. J Community Psychol. 2023 Jan;51(1):438-452. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22916. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Social Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This research is a comparison between the Cooperative Learning program and services as usual. Approximately twelve middle schools will be randomized to a waitlist-control condition. The intervention group will receive training in Cooperative Learning immediately and the waitlist-control group will receive training at the end fo the project. Teachers will be given training on the basics of Cooperative Learning and will be supported in their efforts to implement it in their classrooms. No curricular changes will be required. The initial training will last two or three days and will confirm to the professional development calendar of the intervention schools (selected at random). The implementation of Cooperative Learning is expected to be on-going for the full duration of the project (two years).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2017

First Posted

April 18, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

July 23, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan

Locations