Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Post-Transplant For Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This study has two phases, Phase I and Phase II. The main goal of the Phase I portion of this research study is to see what doses post-transplant inotuzumab ozogamicin can safely be given to subjects without having too many side effects. The Phase II portion of this study is to see what side effects are seen with medication after transplant. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a combination of an antibody and chemotherapy which has been shown to have significant activity against relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is considered experimental in this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_1
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
ExpectedJune 5, 2025
June 1, 2025
8.3 years
April 3, 2017
June 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Phase I MTD
Defined post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation MTD
Up to 112 days (16 weeks)
Phase I DLTs
Frequency of DLTs during the first two cycles in ALL-participants
Up to 112 days (16 weeks)
Phase II Median DFS
Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested
At 3 months after initial treatment
Phase II Median DFS
Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested
At 6 months after initial treatment
Phase II Median DFS
Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested
At 9 months after initial treatment
Phase II Median DFS
Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested
At 1 year after initial treatment
Phase II Median DFS
Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested
Post first dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin
Secondary Outcomes (65)
Phase I Median DFS
At 3 months after initial treatment
Phase I Median DFS
At 6 months after initial treatment
Phase I Median DFS
At 9 months after initial treatment
Phase I Median DFS
At 1 year after initial treatment
Phase I Median DFS
Post first dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1, Cycle 1, where cycle length is 28 days
- +60 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
EXPERIMENTALPhase I: A maximum of 4 cycles will be allowed and doses will be adjusted in 0.1mg/m2 increments using a dose escalation scale depending on tolerability. Total range of dose levels for participants is 0.1-0.6mg/m\^2. Phase II: Participants will be enrolled until all Phase I participants have been followed and assessed for toxicity for at least 4 weeks after the fourth treatment dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin or 4 weeks after the participant goes off treatment, whichever comes first. Doses to be administered will be determined in the phase I portion of the study. The recommended phase 2 dose is 0.3mg/m2. Repeat cycles every 28 days for up to 4 cycles
Interventions
Inotuzumab ozogamicin, IV, 28 day cycles Phase 1 dosages: Dose Level -2 (0.1 mg/m\^2) Dose Level -1 (0.2 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 0 (0.3 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 1 (0.4 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 2 (0.5 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 3 (0.6 mg/m\^2)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of CD22-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from any donor source for acute lymphocytic leukemia
- Patients who are between T+40 and T+100 after allogeneic transplantation. Patients must receive their first dose of inotuzumab at or before T+100.
- Patients who have/are either:
- Transplanted in hematologic first complete remission with evidence of minimal residual disease within 45 days of allogeneic transplantation
- Pre- or Post-Transplant Minimal Residual Disease defined by:
- Any detectable ALL (by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, or PCR techniques) as per clinical indication.
- In second or third complete remission at the time of allogeneic transplantation
- Treated with reduced intensity regimens or non-myeloablative conditioning regimens
- Lymphoid blast crisis of CML
- Are relapsed or refractory to at least 1 line of chemotherapy
- Philadelphia-like ALL
- Patients who have evidence of donor chimerism after allogeneic transplantation.
- ECOG Performance status \< 2
- Participants must have ANC \> 1,000/µL for 3 days and platelet transfusion independence as defined as a platelet count \> 50,000/µL for 7 days.
- +21 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with clinical evidence of disease progression prior to enrollment
- Persistent prior treatment toxicities Grade 2 and above according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 (with the exception for alopecia, neuropathy, etc.)
- Patients with inadequate organ function as defined by:
- Creatinine clearance \< 30ml/min
- Bilirubin \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
- AST (SGOT) \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
- ALT (SGPT) \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
- GVHD grade III or IV (for patients with a prior allogeneic transplant).
- Active acute or chronic GVHD of the liver (for patients with a prior allogeneic transplant)
- History of VOD
- Use of concomitant TKI or sirolimus
- Second active malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (e.g. cervix, bladder, breast)
- Patients with uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women are excluded from this study because inotuzumab ozogamicin may be associated with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown, but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with inotuzumab ozogamicin, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin. These potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study.
- Evidence of myelodysplasia or cytogenetic abnormality indicative of myelodysplasia on any bone marrow biopsy prior to initiation of therapy Serologic status reflecting active hepatitis B or C infection. Patients that are positive for hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis C antibody must have a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) prior to enrollment. (PCR positive patients will be excluded.)
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Leland Methenylead
Study Sites (7)
The University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Publications (1)
Metheny LL, Sobecks R, Cho C, Fu P, Margevicius S, Wang J, Ciarrone L, Kopp S, Convents RD, Majhail N, Caimi PF, Otegbeye F, Cooper BW, Gallogly M, Malek E, Tomlinson B, Gerds AT, Hamilton B, Giralt S, Perales MA, de Lima M. A multicenter study of posttransplantation low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2024 Mar 26;8(6):1384-1391. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011514.
PMID: 38170741DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leland Metheny, MD
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2017
First Posted
April 7, 2017
Study Start
July 31, 2017
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06