NCT03104491

Brief Summary

This study has two phases, Phase I and Phase II. The main goal of the Phase I portion of this research study is to see what doses post-transplant inotuzumab ozogamicin can safely be given to subjects without having too many side effects. The Phase II portion of this study is to see what side effects are seen with medication after transplant. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a combination of an antibody and chemotherapy which has been shown to have significant activity against relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is considered experimental in this study.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
12mo left

Started Jul 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Jul 2017May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 31, 2017

Completed
8.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2025

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

June 5, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8.3 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationdonor chimerism

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Phase I MTD

    Defined post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation MTD

    Up to 112 days (16 weeks)

  • Phase I DLTs

    Frequency of DLTs during the first two cycles in ALL-participants

    Up to 112 days (16 weeks)

  • Phase II Median DFS

    Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested

    At 3 months after initial treatment

  • Phase II Median DFS

    Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested

    At 6 months after initial treatment

  • Phase II Median DFS

    Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested

    At 9 months after initial treatment

  • Phase II Median DFS

    Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested

    At 1 year after initial treatment

  • Phase II Median DFS

    Efficacy as measured by phase II DFS at one year, estimated using Kaplan-Meier, reported as median and 2-sided 80% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) DFS is defined as "Time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (ie,objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (including post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments)". Difference in time-to-event endpoints will be tested using a 1-sided log-rank test at a significance level of 0.10 In Phase II, the null hypothesis of H0: DFS at 1-year ≤ 55% versus the alternative hypothesis of Ha: DFS at 1-year ≥ 75% using 1-sided alpha of 10% will be tested

    Post first dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin

Secondary Outcomes (65)

  • Phase I Median DFS

    At 3 months after initial treatment

  • Phase I Median DFS

    At 6 months after initial treatment

  • Phase I Median DFS

    At 9 months after initial treatment

  • Phase I Median DFS

    At 1 year after initial treatment

  • Phase I Median DFS

    Post first dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1, Cycle 1, where cycle length is 28 days

  • +60 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

EXPERIMENTAL

Phase I: A maximum of 4 cycles will be allowed and doses will be adjusted in 0.1mg/m2 increments using a dose escalation scale depending on tolerability. Total range of dose levels for participants is 0.1-0.6mg/m\^2. Phase II: Participants will be enrolled until all Phase I participants have been followed and assessed for toxicity for at least 4 weeks after the fourth treatment dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin or 4 weeks after the participant goes off treatment, whichever comes first. Doses to be administered will be determined in the phase I portion of the study. The recommended phase 2 dose is 0.3mg/m2. Repeat cycles every 28 days for up to 4 cycles

Drug: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Interventions

Inotuzumab ozogamicin, IV, 28 day cycles Phase 1 dosages: Dose Level -2 (0.1 mg/m\^2) Dose Level -1 (0.2 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 0 (0.3 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 1 (0.4 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 2 (0.5 mg/m\^2) Dose Level 3 (0.6 mg/m\^2)

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of CD22-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from any donor source for acute lymphocytic leukemia
  • Patients who are between T+40 and T+100 after allogeneic transplantation. Patients must receive their first dose of inotuzumab at or before T+100.
  • Patients who have/are either:
  • Transplanted in hematologic first complete remission with evidence of minimal residual disease within 45 days of allogeneic transplantation
  • Pre- or Post-Transplant Minimal Residual Disease defined by:
  • Any detectable ALL (by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, or PCR techniques) as per clinical indication.
  • In second or third complete remission at the time of allogeneic transplantation
  • Treated with reduced intensity regimens or non-myeloablative conditioning regimens
  • Lymphoid blast crisis of CML
  • Are relapsed or refractory to at least 1 line of chemotherapy
  • Philadelphia-like ALL
  • Patients who have evidence of donor chimerism after allogeneic transplantation.
  • ECOG Performance status \< 2
  • Participants must have ANC \> 1,000/µL for 3 days and platelet transfusion independence as defined as a platelet count \> 50,000/µL for 7 days.
  • +21 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with clinical evidence of disease progression prior to enrollment
  • Persistent prior treatment toxicities Grade 2 and above according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 (with the exception for alopecia, neuropathy, etc.)
  • Patients with inadequate organ function as defined by:
  • Creatinine clearance \< 30ml/min
  • Bilirubin \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
  • AST (SGOT) \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
  • ALT (SGPT) \> 2X institutional upper limit of normal
  • GVHD grade III or IV (for patients with a prior allogeneic transplant).
  • Active acute or chronic GVHD of the liver (for patients with a prior allogeneic transplant)
  • History of VOD
  • Use of concomitant TKI or sirolimus
  • Second active malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (e.g. cervix, bladder, breast)
  • Patients with uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women are excluded from this study because inotuzumab ozogamicin may be associated with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown, but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with inotuzumab ozogamicin, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin. These potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study.
  • Evidence of myelodysplasia or cytogenetic abnormality indicative of myelodysplasia on any bone marrow biopsy prior to initiation of therapy Serologic status reflecting active hepatitis B or C infection. Patients that are positive for hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis C antibody must have a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) prior to enrollment. (PCR positive patients will be excluded.)
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

The University of Kansas Cancer Center

Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States

RECRUITING

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

RECRUITING

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68106, United States

RECRUITING

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10065, United States

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States

RECRUITING

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Metheny LL, Sobecks R, Cho C, Fu P, Margevicius S, Wang J, Ciarrone L, Kopp S, Convents RD, Majhail N, Caimi PF, Otegbeye F, Cooper BW, Gallogly M, Malek E, Tomlinson B, Gerds AT, Hamilton B, Giralt S, Perales MA, de Lima M. A multicenter study of posttransplantation low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2024 Mar 26;8(6):1384-1391. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011514.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Interventions

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, LymphoidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CalicheamicinsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Leland Metheny, MD

    University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ron Sobecks, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2017

First Posted

April 7, 2017

Study Start

July 31, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations