Study Evaluating Inotuzumab Ozogamicin In Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
An Open-label, Phase 1/2 Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin In Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Cd22-positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
2 other identifiers
interventional
72
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The Phase 1 portion of this study will assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy at increasing dose levels of inotuzumab ozogamicin in subjects with CD22-positive relapsed or refractory adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in order to select the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule. The Phase 2 portion of the study will evaluate the efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin as measured by hematologic remission rate (CR + CRi) in patients in second or later salvage status.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2011
Typical duration for phase_2
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2017
CompletedApril 13, 2017
March 1, 2017
3 years
May 11, 2011
August 25, 2015
March 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Phase 1 Dose-Finding Phase
DLT was any of the following in the first cycle \& attributable to inotuzumab ozogamicin: any greater than or equal to (≥) Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity except nausea/vomiting (if manageable with supportive care), alopecia, \& toxicities secondary to neutropenia \& sepsis; prolonged myelosuppression (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] less than \[\<\] 500 per microliter \[/µL\] or platelet count \<25,000/µL in bone marrow with \<5 percent (%) blasts \& no evidence of leukemia more than 45 days beyond the most recent dose of test article); any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding toxicities such as alopecia or those secondary to neutropenia \& sepsis) not resolving to ≥ Grade 2 within 7 days of the most recent dose of test article or was clinically significant irrespective of duration; any ≥ Grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin lasting ≥7 days; any test article related toxicity resulting in permanent discontinuation of test article.
Cycle 1
Percentage of Participants With Preliminary Satisfactory Response (Complete Response [CR], CR With Incomplete Count Recovery [CRi], Partial Response [PR], or Resistant Disease [RD]) Indicating Disease Stability After First Dose During Phase 1 Dose-Finding
CR was the disappearance of leukemia indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was as for CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL. PR was an improved or no worsening of acute lymphocytic leukemia indicated by no peripheral blood blasts, and/or at least a 50% decrease in the marrow blast percentage, compared to pre-treatment value, and marrow blast percentage ≥5% and less than or equal to (≤)25% and/or C2 extramedullary disease status. RD occurred if a participant survived ≥7 days following completion of initial treatment course and had persistent leukemia in the most recent peripheral blood smear or bone marrow and/or persistent disease involvement at any extramedullary site after completion of therapy.
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Percentage of Participants With CR or CRi During Phase 2
CR was defined as a disappearance of leukemia as indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and the absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was defined as CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL.
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Percentage of Participants With CR, CRi or PR During the Phase 1 Expansion Phase
CR was defined as a disappearance of leukemia as indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and the absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was defined as CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL. PR was defined as an improved or no worsening of acute lymphocytic leukemia as indicated by no peripheral blood blasts, and either or both of the following: at least a 50% decrease in the marrow blast percentage, compared to the pre-treatment value, and marrow blast percentage ≥5% and ≤25% and/or C2 extramedullary disease status.
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants With CR, CRi or PR in Phase 2
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Participants Achieving CR and CRi
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Percentage of Participants With CR or CRi by Cytogenetic Category
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Post-Treatment Stem-Cell Transplant (SCT)
Up to approximately 2 years from first dose
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Up to approximately 2 years from first dose
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Part 1: Administered intravenously as 2 - 3 weekly doses over a 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. Total dose per cycle 0.8 mg/m\^2 to 2.0 mg/m\^2. Part 2 Expansion and Part 3 Phase 2: Administered intravenously as 3 weekly doses over a 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. Total initial dose per cycle 1.8 mg/m\^2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with CD22-positive ALL with either refractory disease (i.e. disease progression or no response while receiving their most recent prior anti-cancer therapy), or relapsed disease (i.e. response to their most recent prior anti-cancer therapy with subsequent relapse). Subjects enrolled in the Phase 2 portion of the study must be due to receive salvage 2 or later therapy.
- Subjects with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL must have failed standard treatment with at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
- Adequate renal and hepatic function, and negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with isolated extramedullary relapse or active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.
- Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or other anti-CD22 immunotherapy within 4 months, or active graft versus host disease (GvHD) at study entry.
- Evidence or history of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
- UCB Pharmacollaborator
Study Sites (15)
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010-3000, United States
Stanford Unversity Cancer Clinical Trials Office
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Stanford Unversity Hospital and Clinics, CTRU
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Stanford University Hospital and Clinics
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute at Farmington Hills
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Related Publications (3)
Shi Z, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Chen B. Monoclonal antibodies: new chance in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):642-652. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2074704.
PMID: 35622074DERIVEDStock W, Martinelli G, Stelljes M, DeAngelo DJ, Gokbuget N, Advani AS, O'Brien S, Liedtke M, Merchant AA, Cassaday RD, Wang T, Zhang H, Vandendries E, Jabbour E, Marks DI, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):905-913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33321. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
PMID: 33231879DERIVEDDeAngelo DJ, Stock W, Stein AS, Shustov A, Liedtke M, Schiffer CA, Vandendries E, Liau K, Ananthakrishnan R, Boni J, Laird AD, Fostvedt L, Kantarjian HM, Advani AS. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study. Blood Adv. 2017 Jun 27;1(15):1167-1180. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001925. eCollection 2017 Jun 27.
PMID: 29296758DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2011
First Posted
June 1, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 13, 2017
Results First Posted
April 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03