NCT03097653

Brief Summary

The present study aim to assess the effect of an interactive web decision aid on informed choice - measured via knowledge, attitudes and intentions concerning breast cancer screening - comparing the decision aid with a standard information provided via web.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,001

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2017

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 31, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 24, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 16, 2017

Results QC Date

April 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

breast cancer screeningmammographydecision-aidinformed choiceNational Cancer Screening Program

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of Participants With Adequate Knowledge

    Knowledge will be measured using a questionnaire structured in 13 questions with multiple choice answers, with 2 to 4 options. Ten questions will be qualitative and 3 will be numerical. A score of 8 out of 13 (about 60%) or higher would be considered "adequate knowledge".

    7-10 days

  • Attitude

    Attitude will be measured through a scale of 6 items with 5 response options from 1 to 5, with a total score from 6 to 30. The investigators set the threshold for a positive attitude at 24 and consequently the score \<24 point a negative attitude.

    7-10 days

  • Intention

    Intention will be measured using 1 item with 5 responses: Definitely will, Likely to, Unsure, Not likely to, Definitely will not. The investigators classified "definitely will" and "likely to" as positive intentions.

    7-10 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Participation Rate to the Breast Cancer Screening Programme

    15-60 days

  • Satisfaction With the Information Measured Using 8 Items With Three Points Scale

    7-10 days

  • Number of Click on the Homepage

    Through study completion, an average of 10 days

  • Number of Times Web Platforms Were Accessed

    Through study completion, an average of 10 days

  • Number of Pages Visited on the Web Platforms

    Through study completion, an average of 10 days

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Decision-aid

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Decision-aid

Standard information

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Standard information

Interventions

Web platform with a multilevel information and an aid for the decision to be taken. The content is splitted in 16-20 screens; each screen contains the answer to a common question (i.e. What is mammography screening? What are its benefits and harms? What results can be expected from the participation to mammography screening? What is breast cancer?). The information covers also controversial topics as overdiagnosis, overtreatment and the disagreement among scientists about harms and benefits' quantification.

Decision-aid

Web platform with a standard brochure. This standard brochure represents a combination of the best information available from the three participate centre' brochures.

Standard information

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 69 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged 45-69, according to the target age of the screening centres involved;
  • New invited women in mammography screening programme.

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Screening Unit, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute - ISPO

Florence, Italy

Location

UOC Medicina Preventiva delle Comunità - Screening

Milan, 20122, Italy

Location

IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri

Milan, 20156, Italy

Location

U.O. Centro Gestionale Screening, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Palermo

Palermo, Italy

Location

Centro Screeening - AUSL Reggio Emilia

Reggio Emilia, 42122, Italy

Location

CPO Piemonte

Torino, Italy

Location

SSD Epidemiologia e Screening - CPO Piemonte - AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza

Torino, Italy

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Roberto A, Colombo C, Candiani G, Giordano L, Mantellini P, Paci E, Satolli R, Valenza M, Mosconi P. Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3428-9.

    PMID: 28629329BACKGROUND
  • Roberto A, Colombo C, Candiani G, Satolli R, Giordano L, Jaramillo L, Castagno R, Mantellini P, Falini P, Carnesciali E, Valenza M, Costa L, Campari C, Caroli S, Faggiano RC, Orione L, Belmessieri B, Marchio V, Deandrea S, Silvestri A, Luciano D, Paci E, Mosconi P. A dynamic web-based decision aid to improve informed choice in organised breast cancer screening. A pragmatic randomised trial in Italy. Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(5):714-721. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0935-2. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Decision Support Techniques

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Limitations and Caveats

The response rate was lower than expected, and there were about 50% dropouts. We invited more women than expected (21,014 versus 8,160). This high proportion of dropouts could be also due to scarce attention of women to comply with this type of study

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Paola Mosconi and Dr. Anna Roberto
Organization
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2017

First Posted

March 31, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 20, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

March 24, 2021

Results First Posted

March 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Locations