Sedation Methods During Cataract Surgery
A Comparison of Midazolam vs. Midazolam/Ketamine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification Under Topical Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
105
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Phacoemulsification is the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States and European Union and sedation is commonly used during phacoemulsification to help alleviate patient anxiety and prevent the patient from interfering with the procedure. The investigators have administered ketamine in addition to midazolam in this regard. To study the effectiveness of this technique, The investigators proposed a study to determine if adding low-dose ketamine to midazolam has any beneficial (or negative) effects on operating conditions, patient satisfaction, and recovery during and after unilateral phacoemulsification procedures performed using topical anesthesia and intravenous (IV) conscious sedation. Methods: In a free-standing Outpatient Surgery Center, the investigators conducted a randomized, double-masked, 3-arm, prospective comparison of IV midazolam only vs. midazolam with ketamine 5 mg IV vs. midazolam with ketamine 10 mg IV. The investigators then measured a single surgeon's assessment of surgical conditions, self-reported patient satisfaction, postoperative pain score, and duration of postoperative stay. The investigators also analyzed the dose of midazolam required to meet subjective anxiolysis in each group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 19, 2018
CompletedSeptember 10, 2018
August 1, 2018
6 months
February 2, 2017
November 7, 2017
August 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Eye Mobility During Surgery (See Link to Study Protocol for Scale)
Scale of mobility of eye during surgery rate 0 (no movement) to 3 (movement enough to stop surgery).
Intraoperative, end of operation reported
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Measure of Comfort (See Link to Study Protocol for Scale)
Obtained on the first day after surgery during the subject's routine postoperative check in the Ophthalmology Clinic.
PACU Length of Stay
This will occur one time only, in a range of 20 to 30 minutes after the surgery is completed.
Nausea
This will occur from time of entry into PACU to time of departure after their surgery. (One time only, in a range of 20 to 30 minutes after surgery.
Study Arms (3)
Midazolam alone
PLACEBO COMPARATORDrug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + normal saline placebo. Midazolam + Normal saline
Midazolam + Ketamine 5 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML. Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML. Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML
Interventions
5 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
10 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Preoperative control: Normal saline placebo given preoperatively. Then protocol followed for titration of midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18, older than 80, those with a serum creatinine \>3 mg/dl, advanced liver disease (liver enzymes twice the normal range or higher), and those with an allergy to any of the study medications were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study may be a bit underpowered for the small differences between groups in measured outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Timothy Harwood
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy N Harwood, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Surgical conditions and patient response not aware of medication given.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2017
First Posted
February 15, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2016
Primary Completion
November 5, 2016
Study Completion
November 11, 2016
Last Updated
September 10, 2018
Results First Posted
January 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share