NCT03049098

Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to compare the visual interests between residents in high-fidelity simulation practice

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 14, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 25, 2017

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 9, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4 days

First QC Date

February 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Eye-trackingHigh Fidelity Simulation TrainingVisual Perception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to first fixation, Total visit time

    Using eye-tracking technology, gaze date can be aggregate onto Areas of interest where data can be extrapolated.

    During the scenario

Study Arms (2)

Success at the simulation

Participant could correctly set the pacing unit to obtain electrical and mechanical pacing of the mannequin in nine minutes.

Behavioral: Simulation

Failed the simulation

Participant could not correctly set the pacing unit to obtain electrical and mechanical pacing of the mannequin in nine minutes.

Behavioral: Simulation

Interventions

SimulationBEHAVIORAL

A 9-minute scenario based on an ACLS bradycardia algorithm in which a high-fidelity mannequin requires external pacing

Failed the simulationSuccess at the simulation

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

First-year medical residents from various specialties at Université de Montréal Simulation center

You may qualify if:

  • First-year residents from various specialties in their first three weeks of training

You may not qualify if:

  • Underwent a previous residency
  • Attending physicians in another country

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Duchowski AT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):455-70. doi: 10.3758/bf03195475.

    PMID: 12564550BACKGROUND
  • Turgeon DP, Lam EW. Influence of Experience and Training on Dental Students' Examination Performance Regarding Panoramic Images. J Dent Educ. 2016 Feb;80(2):156-64.

    PMID: 26834133BACKGROUND
  • Wilson MR, McGrath JS, Vine SJ, Brewer J, Defriend D, Masters RS. Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1546-4. Epub 2011 Feb 27.

    PMID: 21359902BACKGROUND
  • Schulz CM, Schneider E, Fritz L, Vockeroth J, Hapfelmeier A, Wasmaier M, Kochs EF, Schneider G. Eye tracking for assessment of workload: a pilot study in an anaesthesia simulator environment. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):44-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq307. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

    PMID: 21037266BACKGROUND
  • Browning M, Cooper S, Cant R, Sparkes L, Bogossian F, Williams B, O'Meara P, Ross L, Munro G, Black B. The use and limits of eye-tracking in high-fidelity clinical scenarios: A pilot study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Mar;25:43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

    PMID: 26455897BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Issam Tanoubi, Dr

    Université de Montreal

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Mathieu Tourangeau, Dr

    Université de Montreal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Université de Montréal

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2017

First Posted

February 9, 2017

Study Start

July 14, 2016

Primary Completion

July 18, 2016

Study Completion

January 25, 2017

Last Updated

February 9, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share