NCT03035942

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate not only the occurrence of side effects, but the quality of the recovery (QoR-40 Questionnaire) of patients submitted to spinal anesthesia with administration of low doses (0.1 mg) of intrathecal morphine for the surgical treatment of fractures in one of the lower limbs and who will receive prophylactic ondansetron (4mg), dexamethasone (8mg) or placebo.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
135

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2017

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2017

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 4, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2017

Results QC Date

December 9, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Intrathecal morphineNausea and vomitingQuality of recoveryPatient satisfactionPruritusPostoperative pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery

    Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40). Minimum score 40 (very poor quality of recovery) and maximun score 200 (excellent quality of recovery). Higher scores mean better outcome

    Twenty four hours after surgery by a blinded investigator

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Nausea and Vomiting During PACU Staying

    4h

  • Number of Participants With Pruritus

    24 hours

  • Pain During Postanesthesia Care Unit and Ward Stay (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS)

    24 hours

Study Arms (3)

D Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Dexamethasone 8 mg

Drug: Dexamethasone

O group

EXPERIMENTAL

Ondansetron 4 mg

Drug: Ondansetron

S group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Normal saline (5 mL total volume)

Drug: Saline

Interventions

Dexamethasone 8 mg (made up to 5 mL with normal saline) will be drawn into each syringe which will be offered to the anesthesia provider after the opaque envelope was opened and administered immediately after spinal anesthesia was performed.

Also known as: D Group
D Group

Ondansetron 4 mg (made up to 5 mL with normal saline) will be drawn into each syringe which will be offered to the anesthesia provider after the opaque envelope was opened and administered immediately after spinal anesthesia was performed.

Also known as: O Group
O group
SalineDRUG

Normal saline (5 mL total volume) will be drawn into each syringe which will be offered to the anesthesia provider after the opaque envelope was opened and administered immediately after spinal anesthesia was performed.

Also known as: Placebo Group
S group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA physical status I or II, who will scheduled to undergo surgical treatment of lower limb fractures

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who:
  • (i) refused to participate in the study;
  • (ii) were not able to communicate due to alterations in the level of consciousness, or neurologic, or psychiatric disease;
  • (iii) presented with contraindication to any of the drugs used in the present study;
  • (iv) had history of alcohol or drug abuse and
  • (v) had surgery in the last 10 days were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Santa Lucinda Hospital

Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18030-230, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Jacobson L, Chabal C, Brody MC, Ward RJ, Wasse L. Intrathecal methadone: a dose-response study and comparison with intrathecal morphine 0.5 mg. Pain. 1990 Nov;43(2):141-148. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)91066-R.

    PMID: 2087326BACKGROUND
  • Slappendel R, Weber EW, Dirksen R, Gielen MJ, van Limbeek J. Optimization of the dose of intrathecal morphine in total hip surgery: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):822-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00026.

    PMID: 10195531BACKGROUND
  • Koju RB, Gurung BS, Dongol Y. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 17;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-18.

    PMID: 25971957BACKGROUND
  • Braga AA, Frias JA, Braga FS, Poterio GB, Hirata ES, Torres NA. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Use of hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg) combined with different adjuvants. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;62(6):775-87. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70178-2.

    PMID: 23176986BACKGROUND
  • Krajnik M, Zylicz Z. Understanding pruritus in systemic disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Feb;21(2):151-68. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00256-6.

    PMID: 11226766BACKGROUND
  • Griffiths JD, Gyte GM, Paranjothy S, Brown HC, Broughton HK, Thomas J. Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub2.

    PMID: 22972112BACKGROUND
  • Wu JI, Lo Y, Chia YY, Liu K, Fong WP, Yang LC, Tan PH. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine for Cesarean section: a randomized comparison of dexamethasone, droperidol, and a combination. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.11.004. Epub 2007 Feb 1.

    PMID: 17275282BACKGROUND
  • Szarvas S, Chellapuri RS, Harmon DC, Owens J, Murphy D, Shorten GD. A comparison of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and dexamethasone plus ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic and antipruritic therapy in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for major orthopedic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):259-63, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000066310.49139.2a.

    PMID: 12818978BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

    PMID: 10740540BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, BonePostoperative Nausea and VomitingPruritusPersonal SatisfactionNauseaVomitingPatient SatisfactionPain, Postoperative

Interventions

DexamethasoneOndansetronO-antigen, Acinetobacter strain 90Sodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin ManifestationsBehaviorTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCarbazolesIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro
Organization
Pontificia Catholic University of Sao Paulo

Study Officials

  • Eduardo T Moro, Professor

    PUC São Paulo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Group assignments will be sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that were opened after patient inclusion in the study. All care providers, researchers, and patients will be blinded to group assignments. Study 5-mL syringes will be prepared by a nurse independent of the study. Normal saline (5 mL total volume), dexamethasone (made up to 5 mL with normal saline), or ondansetron 4 mg (made up to 5 mL with normal saline) will be drawn into each syringe which will be offered to the anesthesia provider after the opaque envelope was opened.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2017

First Posted

January 30, 2017

Study Start

January 2, 2017

Primary Completion

October 1, 2018

Study Completion

November 4, 2019

Last Updated

March 19, 2020

Results First Posted

March 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations