Study Stopped
Insufficient Accrual
Gadobutrol Versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine or Gadobenate Dimeglumine Before DCE-MRI in Diagnosing Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, Grade II-IV Glioma, or Brain Metastases
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Steady State T1-Weighted Perfusion MRI (DCE MRI): Characterization of Intracranial Lesions
5 other identifiers
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot clinical trial compares gadobutrol with standard of care contrast agents, gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobenate dimeglumine, before dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing patients with multiple sclerosis, grade II-IV glioma, or tumors that have spread to the brain. Gadobutrol is a type of contrast agent that may increase DCE-MRI sensitivity for the detection of tumors or other diseases of the central nervous system. It is not yet known whether gadobutrol is more effective than standard of care contrast agents before DCE-MRI in diagnosing patients with multiple sclerosis, grade II-IV glioma, or tumors that have spread to the brain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 14, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2016
CompletedMarch 27, 2017
March 1, 2017
2.8 years
September 13, 2015
March 22, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Agreement of using Magnevist® or Multihance versus Gadavist® on glioma grading
Weighted Kappa analysis will be used to examine the agreement of using Magnevist® or Multihance versus Gadavist® on glioma grading.
Up to 7 days
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (Magnevist/Multihance, Gadavist, DCE-MRI)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive standard of care gadopentetate dimeglumine IV twice within 5 minutes or gadobenate dimeglumine IV twice within 5 minutes and then undergo DCE-MRI on day 1. Patients also receive gadobutrol IV twice within 5 minutes and then undergo DCE-MRI over approximately 30 minutes on day 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7.
Interventions
Undergo DCE-MRI
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, known or suspected diagnosis of glioma, or known or suspected diagnosis of cerebral metastasis
- Scheduled or to be scheduled for a follow-up MRI per standard of care for their disease
- Minimum permitted time intervals from prior treatments are 6 weeks for intracranial surgery
- Adequate renal function (serum creatinine =\< 1.5 mg/dL)
- Subject must sign a study-specific informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Medically unstable
- Renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2) or history of existing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)
- Cardiac pacemaker
- A serious concurrent infection, illness, or medical condition
- Subjects with any surgical clip, external clips, or any other ferromagnetic device, that is contraindicated for use in MRI
- Subject is claustrophobic and cannot cooperate for the MRI
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Any other condition that would compromise the scan with reasonable safety
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Southern Californialead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meng Law
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2015
First Posted
November 18, 2016
Study Start
December 14, 2011
Primary Completion
October 14, 2014
Study Completion
October 14, 2015
Last Updated
March 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03